An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

It’s still the economy, but we’re not stupid

This morning, financial news channel CNBC was kind enough to point out that “The Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers said the final reading in May for its index of confidence fell to 59.8 from April’s 62.6, slightly above the median expectation of 59.5 in a Reuters survey of economists. May’s reading was the lowest since 58.7 in June 1980….”

That’s right, consumer confidence hasn’t been this low since, well, since oil was at record high prices.

Although this article mentions that “one-year inflation expectations surg[ed] to 5.2 percent” and “five-year inflation expectations jumped to 3.4 percent”, you got a different picture if you actually watched CNBC this morning. On TV, they were talking about the work of economist John Williams (no, not the guy who writes those cool soundtracks for George Lucas and Steven Spielberg). Alas, CNBC did not have the clip online, but here’s what he says:

John Williams, who spent more than two decades as an economic consultant to Fortune 500 companies, said the government figures understate the true rate of inflation.

Williams, who runs Shadow Government Statistics in Oakland, which tracks changes in inflation, unemployment, the gross national product and other data, said that over the past 25 years, the government has changed the method of calculating price increases in ways that have lowered the reported inflation rate.

The changes include measuring the cost of shelter by rental prices instead of home values, as well as giving nearly as much weight to high-ticket items such as cars and electronics as to daily necessities such as food and gasoline.

According to Williams, if the government measured inflation based on pre-1982 methods, it would be running at 11.6 percent right now, or 7.3 percent using pre-1998 calculations.

“I don’t think the government numbers are too credible,” Williams said.

That’s right, the real inflation rate, as measured 25 years ago, would be more like 11%. And keep in mind that you have bills that didn’t exist when Reagan took office: you might not have had a cable bill, you probably didn’t have a cell phone bill, and you certainly didn’t have an internet services bill. No wonder our personal budgets are out of control, particularly when you consider that wages have not kept pace with the under-reported inflation we currently have.

That seems much more in line with your experience at the mall and grocery store, doesn’t it? I wonder what the real unemployment rate is.

  • Jim_Satterfield
    One of the key things that we have never developed a way to track is underemployment. A few years back I was talking to the guy helping me at Best Buy and it turned out his previous job was as a network engineer. Often I hear apologists for the status quo talk about people leaving their jobs working for other people to start their own business. They never seem to grasp that doing that because it's what you wanted to do is not the same thing as doing it because you were fired and can't find another job. In addition the question of pay and benefits offered by either the new jobs or being self-employed is often ignored. All jobs are not equal. Simple unemployment figures are just this side of meaningless nowadays.
  • bellisaurius
    Wouldn't it be inappropriate to use the old system because the weighting for the CPI is different now? I mean, I didn't own a computer back in 1980, so determing the inflation related expenses to my budget that exist now (interenet costs and computer costs) are completely different now.

    Example: Back then, I might buy a VCR for $500, today, the same item is $100, maybe, even less for the replacement, a DVD player. That's hugely deflationary.
  • pacatrue
    Very interesting, thanks!
  • Jim_Satterfield
    The old system would have to have some adjustment for those things, true. But how often do you have those expenses? How well does the current system weigh things like that against ongoing expenses such as food, fuel, type of housing expenses, car insurance and health insurance?
  • bellisaurius
    Actually, the CPI looks even better (comparing 1980's and 1990's) if you take into account the percentages for food, fuel and neccessities, as they take up a smaller proportion of our budgets, so an increase of 100% in fuel is more like a 1-5% increase in our total budget.

    I think this bears out in the data. The doubling of fuel prices since last year has dropped use by less than a percent (actually probably a bit more, since there are more cars on the road). It may be hurting at the edges, but society as a whole hasn't been hurt enough to react correctly yet.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC