An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Big Brother, or Big Bother? Creeping Closer to a National ID for Everyone?

It began this week. On May 26, 2008, passengers over the age of 18 are now required to show a U.S. federal
or state-issued photo ID that contains one’s
name,
date of birth,
gender,
expiration date
“and a tamper-resistant feature.”

IDs include U.S. passport,
U.S. passport card ,
DHS “Trusted Traveler” cards (NEXUS, SENTRI, FAST),
DHS-designated enhanced driver’s license,
Drivers Licenses
or other state photo identity cards issued by Department of Motor Vehicles (or equivalent) that meet REAL ID benchmarks (All states are currently in compliance)

Non-US/Canadian citizens are not required to carry their passports if
they have documents issued by the U.S. government such as Permanent Resident Cards.
Those who do not should be carrying their passports while visiting the U.S.

This standardization of the list of accepted documents better aligns TSA with other DHS components, including Customs and Border Protection, and REAL ID benchmarks.

As of this week, passengers who do not present an acceptable ID may be subject to additional screening.

Um, not sure what ‘additional screening’ means exactly. But if you’ve ever had to put your little bare tootsies or your big black-socked feet in the footprints painted on the floor of security check at the terminal, or been wanded, or had all your luggage rifled through by an unsmiling person who looks far more suspcious a character than you do… then you know, that you can well miss your flight and lose a pile of money on a non-refundie ticket or miss your paying gig ten cities over, or not be able to kiss you great-great-great grandma goodbye before she expires.

In the main, this is what bewilders most: “This standardization of the list of accepted documents better aligns TSA with other DHS components, including Customs and Border Protection, and REAL ID benchmarks….” That instead of living our lives, and flying cross-country or out of the country in order to be with friends and family and work, and instead of our government giving any thought to what ‘pursuit of happiness’ actually means, not just happiness, but freedom from oppressive interferances…

well, just how on earth did we ever get put in the position of living our lives so as to better align our one precious life with whatever TSA wants, TSA gets.

I’m not talking about the people who work for TSA. As it is said, they are only following orders. But, from where I stand–er, sit– as a frequently sqwished between two huge men in the middle seat, flier… I think most air travelers have probably already made up some choice names for what the initials TSA really stand for.

For me, I think Time Squandered Awesomely, might be a good start.

  • Amanda
    If we had a national standard ID that replaced/covered everything else, wouldn't that save time at the airport? Instead of having a driver's license and a passport and a social security card and a birth certificate, we'd just have one card with a photo and our basic info on it. TSA screeners wouldn't have to pull aside people with non-photo ID's, or learn the 20 different ways to fake a dozen different forms of ID. In the long run, if it was set up properly, a national ID would probably save time and money.
  • spirasol
    ...........and soon after we will all be placed on probation, with little chips embedded under our skin. Found guilty without a trial. Freedom of movement? not allowed without the chip. In this way our whereabouts can be ascertained at any time and you wouldn't be able to make those flimsy excuses anymore, because, unbeknownst to you, as you walk down the street you will be triggering monitors that will record who walked where and when. AND since all of this should only frighten the criminals, it means they will stay in hiding and we will be able to take care of our business with a deepened sense of security, unfettered by folks who just slow things down.

    Even if I opted to not get the chip, when I walk down main street I notice all the cameras whirring as I pass by. Funny though, the cameras did pick up the poor homeless guy robbing the liquer store and the crazed soldier threatening to shoot himself, but no, it didn't pick up the lies of the Bush administration and it missed the magical changes in the document known as the Constitution, and white collar crime seems to occur too often in areas where cameras and chips don't.

    If Bush were to ask, as it applies to folks who do or don't want more security in the forms being offered, by implying that we have to decide if we are with him or against him...............I'm one of those.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC