An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Creating the Illusion of Progress and Integrity

The Sunlight Foundation captures a political tactic in Like Swimming in Molasses

“At Sunlight, when we learned that Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was convening a task force to address the issue of earmarks, we knew the odds of progress were slim. McConnell is an appropriator, a champion of earmarks and an ardent foe of almost every conceivable good government reform. He also has a keen political ear. So by forming a task force on earmark reform, he could arguably demonstrate action without actually moving. As “The Hill” reports here, Senator McConnell not only continues placing obstacles to moderate reform, but he is resisting a push for earmark transparency coming from within his own party.

How did McConnell undertake the issue without putting his caucus at risk of actually having to change its ways on earmarks? He appointed a working group with members on such opposite ends of the earmark spectrum odds were against success. Then he told them to come up with a unanimous recommendation. When they did that, McConnell moved the goal line again, saying he would attempt to work with the Democratic Leader to consider creating a Senate Rule the encompassed the suggestions. Even the most casual political observer wouldn’t be surprised to find that those “negotiations” came to nothing.

So it appears that the tactic is for leaders to pretend to seek solutions by putting the least flexible legislators together to negotiate. It seems to me that if the goal is progress then leaders would put the most pragmatic members of their team at the table. thus solutions that would appeal to the majority citizens are thwarted in order to protect either personal interests, special interests or the allegiance of narrow minded constituents. So what do you think is the remedy?

  • Slamfu
    Standard GOP operating procedure. Don't actually fix the issue, just rework people's perception of the issue while you continue to fleece the public.
  • Vote the jerks out of office.
  • On a related note (h/t Andrew Sullivan) by Patrick Ruffini:
    In the minority, our job is to 1) make the majority’s life miserable, grinding the House and Senate floors to a halt, and building a narrative of the Democrats as broken and incompetent, and 2) offer big, bold alternatives to this mess like the Contract did in 1994.
  • woops...
  • jchem
    "Vote the jerks out of office."

    I think that's the best piece of advice that anyone could offer. I just wonder if there are still just enough people who will blindly vote for someone of their party that some of these clowns might actually slip by...
  • runasim
    What this election is demonstrating, unfortuanelty, is that the elecotrate only want to vote the bums out of offiive who belong to the opposition party. Not many voters would be willing to stand on principle if it meant dimishing their candidate's chances.
    The only way to stop the cycles is to get special intereest money out of political campaigns,

    The earmarks for projects that benefit constituencies are more idifficult to tackle, because that's what politicians are elected to do: look out for their home base. Some of that has to be tolerated, I think, but transparency has to be an antidote.

    The transparency the Democrats promised has been delivered only in baby steps.
    They have been thwarted by the GOP at avery step, but a number of them also, have been far from enthusiasstic about reforms. No one is ready to give up the cash cows or the gimmicks by which the trail of influence can be camouflaged.

    Maybe we need a march on Wshington about this along the lines of anti-war protests.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC