
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Riverdaughter&#8217;s &#8220;Pocket Guide to the Obamaniac Behavior Cycle&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 13:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138293</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 07:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138293</guid>
		<description>Jill, you&#039;re welcome.  It is a complex issue but when one (such as a politician) is communicating with a group of people then there are common reference points and assumptions, which don&#039;t need further discussion, to get one&#039;s point across.  When a politician campaigns her or she is trying to appeal to to that crowd and identify with them (and have them identify with him- or her).  So if everyone in the room is a bigot and bigoted comments are thrown about with no clarification or caveats, then I think in that situation it WILL be construed that the politician agrees with the statement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I agree with you that silence doesn&#039;t always mean consent.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In other circumstances (i.e. with doctors or priests) that silence is meant to be non- judgmental.  But in those circumstances the doctor (or priest or whoever) is not trying to win a popularity contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill, you&#39;re welcome.  It is a complex issue but when one (such as a politician) is communicating with a group of people then there are common reference points and assumptions, which don&#39;t need further discussion, to get one&#39;s point across.  When a politician campaigns her or she is trying to appeal to to that crowd and identify with them (and have them identify with him- or her).  So if everyone in the room is a bigot and bigoted comments are thrown about with no clarification or caveats, then I think in that situation it WILL be construed that the politician agrees with the statement.</p>
<p>But I agree with you that silence doesn&#39;t always mean consent.  </p>
<p>In other circumstances (i.e. with doctors or priests) that silence is meant to be non- judgmental.  But in those circumstances the doctor (or priest or whoever) is not trying to win a popularity contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138296</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 07:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138296</guid>
		<description>Jill, you&#039;re welcome.  It is a complex issue but when one (such as a politician) is communicating with a group of people then there are common reference points and assumptions, which don&#039;t need further discussion, to get one&#039;s point across.  When a politician campaigns her or she is trying to appeal to to that crowd and identify with them (and have them identify with him- or her).  So if everyone in the room is a bigot and bigoted comments are thrown about with no clarification or caveats, then I think in that situation it WILL be construed that the politician agrees with the statement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I agree with you that silence doesn&#039;t always mean consent.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In other circumstances (i.e. with doctors or priests) that silence is meant to be non- judgmental.  But in those circumstances the doctor (or priest or whoever) is not trying to win a popularity contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill, you&#39;re welcome.  It is a complex issue but when one (such as a politician) is communicating with a group of people then there are common reference points and assumptions, which don&#39;t need further discussion, to get one&#39;s point across.  When a politician campaigns her or she is trying to appeal to to that crowd and identify with them (and have them identify with him- or her).  So if everyone in the room is a bigot and bigoted comments are thrown about with no clarification or caveats, then I think in that situation it WILL be construed that the politician agrees with the statement.</p>
<p>But I agree with you that silence doesn&#39;t always mean consent.  </p>
<p>In other circumstances (i.e. with doctors or priests) that silence is meant to be non- judgmental.  But in those circumstances the doctor (or priest or whoever) is not trying to win a popularity contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138299</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 07:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138299</guid>
		<description>Jill, you&#039;re welcome.  It is a complex issue but when one (such as a politician) is communicating with a group of people then there are common reference points and assumptions, which don&#039;t need further discussion, to get one&#039;s point across.  When a politician campaigns her or she is trying to appeal to to that crowd and identify with them (and have them identify with him- or her).  So if everyone in the room is a bigot and bigoted comments are thrown about with no clarification or caveats, then I think in that situation it WILL be construed that the politician agrees with the statement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I agree with you that silence doesn&#039;t always mean consent.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In other circumstances (i.e. with doctors or priests) that silence is meant to be non- judgmental.  But in those circumstances the doctor (or priest or whoever) is not trying to win a popularity contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill, you&#39;re welcome.  It is a complex issue but when one (such as a politician) is communicating with a group of people then there are common reference points and assumptions, which don&#39;t need further discussion, to get one&#39;s point across.  When a politician campaigns her or she is trying to appeal to to that crowd and identify with them (and have them identify with him- or her).  So if everyone in the room is a bigot and bigoted comments are thrown about with no clarification or caveats, then I think in that situation it WILL be construed that the politician agrees with the statement.</p>
<p>But I agree with you that silence doesn&#39;t always mean consent.  </p>
<p>In other circumstances (i.e. with doctors or priests) that silence is meant to be non- judgmental.  But in those circumstances the doctor (or priest or whoever) is not trying to win a popularity contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillmz</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillmz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138287</guid>
		<description>StockBoy - you raise an interesting point about which I&#039;ve gone round and round with many people: the meaning of silence.  I don&#039;t want to get into it here, but depending on who is being silent and in what context, it isn&#039;t always agreement - and even the people involved know that.  In fact - I think it might even be a truism to say that it means agreement or support.  But again - this is worth a full post and real thought.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StockBoy &#8211; you raise an interesting point about which I&#39;ve gone round and round with many people: the meaning of silence.  I don&#39;t want to get into it here, but depending on who is being silent and in what context, it isn&#39;t always agreement &#8211; and even the people involved know that.  In fact &#8211; I think it might even be a truism to say that it means agreement or support.  But again &#8211; this is worth a full post and real thought.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillmz</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillmz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138291</guid>
		<description>StockBoy - you raise an interesting point about which I&#039;ve gone round and round with many people: the meaning of silence.  I don&#039;t want to get into it here, but depending on who is being silent and in what context, it isn&#039;t always agreement - and even the people involved know that.  In fact - I think it might even be a truism to say that it means agreement or support.  But again - this is worth a full post and real thought.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StockBoy &#8211; you raise an interesting point about which I&#39;ve gone round and round with many people: the meaning of silence.  I don&#39;t want to get into it here, but depending on who is being silent and in what context, it isn&#39;t always agreement &#8211; and even the people involved know that.  In fact &#8211; I think it might even be a truism to say that it means agreement or support.  But again &#8211; this is worth a full post and real thought.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillmz</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138298</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillmz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138298</guid>
		<description>StockBoy - you raise an interesting point about which I&#039;ve gone round and round with many people: the meaning of silence.  I don&#039;t want to get into it here, but depending on who is being silent and in what context, it isn&#039;t always agreement - and even the people involved know that.  In fact - I think it might even be a truism to say that it means agreement or support.  But again - this is worth a full post and real thought.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StockBoy &#8211; you raise an interesting point about which I&#39;ve gone round and round with many people: the meaning of silence.  I don&#39;t want to get into it here, but depending on who is being silent and in what context, it isn&#39;t always agreement &#8211; and even the people involved know that.  In fact &#8211; I think it might even be a truism to say that it means agreement or support.  But again &#8211; this is worth a full post and real thought.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138283</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138283</guid>
		<description>Kathryn, on Roe v. Wade (from McCain&#039;s own 2008 Presidential campaign website- you can&#039;t get any more authoritative than that):&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;John McCain believes Roe v. Wade is a flawed decision that must be overturned, and as president he will nominate judges who understand that courts should not be in the business of legislating from the bench. &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b18512-d5b6-456e-90a2-12028d71df58.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On some of your other points:  you are right, some folks will never vote for a black guy and some will never vote for a woman.  As far as Hillary&#039;s &quot;principles&quot; in wooing the racist voters (and this goes for all politicians and whatever racist/sexist/etc. group there is in the US).... Hillary (or any politician) may not like those groups but those groups do vote and there is common ground that can be had.  Hillary can support them on some other issues.  If they respect her and if Hillary stands up as a leader and makes it clear that racist behavior is not acceptable, then attitudes will change.  (As I said that applies to other politicians, too- I used Hill as an example since she is who you mentioned).  What is not acceptable is to let discrimination or racists comments go by unchallenged because saying nothing will be construed as one&#039;s agreement with bigoted comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn, on Roe v. Wade (from McCain&#39;s own 2008 Presidential campaign website- you can&#39;t get any more authoritative than that):</p>
<p>&#8220;John McCain believes Roe v. Wade is a flawed decision that must be overturned, and as president he will nominate judges who understand that courts should not be in the business of legislating from the bench. &#8220;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b18512-d5b6-456e-90a2-12028d71df58.htm">http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b1&#8230;</a></p>
<p>On some of your other points:  you are right, some folks will never vote for a black guy and some will never vote for a woman.  As far as Hillary&#39;s &#8220;principles&#8221; in wooing the racist voters (and this goes for all politicians and whatever racist/sexist/etc. group there is in the US)&#8230;. Hillary (or any politician) may not like those groups but those groups do vote and there is common ground that can be had.  Hillary can support them on some other issues.  If they respect her and if Hillary stands up as a leader and makes it clear that racist behavior is not acceptable, then attitudes will change.  (As I said that applies to other politicians, too- I used Hill as an example since she is who you mentioned).  What is not acceptable is to let discrimination or racists comments go by unchallenged because saying nothing will be construed as one&#39;s agreement with bigoted comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138286</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138286</guid>
		<description>Kathryn, on Roe v. Wade (from McCain&#039;s own 2008 Presidential campaign website- you can&#039;t get any more authoritative than that):&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;John McCain believes Roe v. Wade is a flawed decision that must be overturned, and as president he will nominate judges who understand that courts should not be in the business of legislating from the bench. &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b18512-d5b6-456e-90a2-12028d71df58.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On some of your other points:  you are right, some folks will never vote for a black guy and some will never vote for a woman.  As far as Hillary&#039;s &quot;principles&quot; in wooing the racist voters (and this goes for all politicians and whatever racist/sexist/etc. group there is in the US).... Hillary (or any politician) may not like those groups but those groups do vote and there is common ground that can be had.  Hillary can support them on some other issues.  If they respect her and if Hillary stands up as a leader and makes it clear that racist behavior is not acceptable, then attitudes will change.  (As I said that applies to other politicians, too- I used Hill as an example since she is who you mentioned).  What is not acceptable is to let discrimination or racists comments go by unchallenged because saying nothing will be construed as one&#039;s agreement with bigoted comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn, on Roe v. Wade (from McCain&#39;s own 2008 Presidential campaign website- you can&#39;t get any more authoritative than that):</p>
<p>&#8220;John McCain believes Roe v. Wade is a flawed decision that must be overturned, and as president he will nominate judges who understand that courts should not be in the business of legislating from the bench. &#8220;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b18512-d5b6-456e-90a2-12028d71df58.htm">http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b1&#8230;</a></p>
<p>On some of your other points:  you are right, some folks will never vote for a black guy and some will never vote for a woman.  As far as Hillary&#39;s &#8220;principles&#8221; in wooing the racist voters (and this goes for all politicians and whatever racist/sexist/etc. group there is in the US)&#8230;. Hillary (or any politician) may not like those groups but those groups do vote and there is common ground that can be had.  Hillary can support them on some other issues.  If they respect her and if Hillary stands up as a leader and makes it clear that racist behavior is not acceptable, then attitudes will change.  (As I said that applies to other politicians, too- I used Hill as an example since she is who you mentioned).  What is not acceptable is to let discrimination or racists comments go by unchallenged because saying nothing will be construed as one&#39;s agreement with bigoted comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138292</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138292</guid>
		<description>Kathryn, on Roe v. Wade (from McCain&#039;s own 2008 Presidential campaign website- you can&#039;t get any more authoritative than that):&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;John McCain believes Roe v. Wade is a flawed decision that must be overturned, and as president he will nominate judges who understand that courts should not be in the business of legislating from the bench. &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b18512-d5b6-456e-90a2-12028d71df58.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On some of your other points:  you are right, some folks will never vote for a black guy and some will never vote for a woman.  As far as Hillary&#039;s &quot;principles&quot; in wooing the racist voters (and this goes for all politicians and whatever racist/sexist/etc. group there is in the US).... Hillary (or any politician) may not like those groups but those groups do vote and there is common ground that can be had.  Hillary can support them on some other issues.  If they respect her and if Hillary stands up as a leader and makes it clear that racist behavior is not acceptable, then attitudes will change.  (As I said that applies to other politicians, too- I used Hill as an example since she is who you mentioned).  What is not acceptable is to let discrimination or racists comments go by unchallenged because saying nothing will be construed as one&#039;s agreement with bigoted comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn, on Roe v. Wade (from McCain&#39;s own 2008 Presidential campaign website- you can&#39;t get any more authoritative than that):</p>
<p>&#8220;John McCain believes Roe v. Wade is a flawed decision that must be overturned, and as president he will nominate judges who understand that courts should not be in the business of legislating from the bench. &#8220;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b18512-d5b6-456e-90a2-12028d71df58.htm">http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/95b1&#8230;</a></p>
<p>On some of your other points:  you are right, some folks will never vote for a black guy and some will never vote for a woman.  As far as Hillary&#39;s &#8220;principles&#8221; in wooing the racist voters (and this goes for all politicians and whatever racist/sexist/etc. group there is in the US)&#8230;. Hillary (or any politician) may not like those groups but those groups do vote and there is common ground that can be had.  Hillary can support them on some other issues.  If they respect her and if Hillary stands up as a leader and makes it clear that racist behavior is not acceptable, then attitudes will change.  (As I said that applies to other politicians, too- I used Hill as an example since she is who you mentioned).  What is not acceptable is to let discrimination or racists comments go by unchallenged because saying nothing will be construed as one&#39;s agreement with bigoted comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138278</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138278</guid>
		<description>aba23 and Jill:  I too have wondered what the world would look like if the candidates&#039; standings were reversed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aba23 and Jill:  I too have wondered what the world would look like if the candidates&#39; standings were reversed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138281</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138281</guid>
		<description>aba23 and Jill:  I too have wondered what the world would look like if the candidates&#039; standings were reversed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aba23 and Jill:  I too have wondered what the world would look like if the candidates&#39; standings were reversed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138285</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138285</guid>
		<description>aba23 and Jill:  I too have wondered what the world would look like if the candidates&#039; standings were reversed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aba23 and Jill:  I too have wondered what the world would look like if the candidates&#39; standings were reversed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138272</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138272</guid>
		<description>Jill, I love the guide- thanks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;t-Steel:  I&#039;m with Jill, your addition is PRICELESS and so true!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;rureddy:  &quot;Obama supporters would like nothing better than for Hillary to exit...&quot;&lt;br&gt;As an Obama supporter I am happy to let the last contest happens on June 3.  But after the people have had their say I do want a quick resolution and the second-place candidate to step aside and not take the fight to Denver.  I do expect Obama to receive the nomination, but this is one race where even this late in the game I&#039;m not going to claim that Obama as the nominee is a sure thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill, I love the guide- thanks!</p>
<p>t-Steel:  I&#39;m with Jill, your addition is PRICELESS and so true!</p>
<p>rureddy:  &#8220;Obama supporters would like nothing better than for Hillary to exit&#8230;&#8221;<br />As an Obama supporter I am happy to let the last contest happens on June 3.  But after the people have had their say I do want a quick resolution and the second-place candidate to step aside and not take the fight to Denver.  I do expect Obama to receive the nomination, but this is one race where even this late in the game I&#39;m not going to claim that Obama as the nominee is a sure thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138275</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138275</guid>
		<description>Jill, I love the guide- thanks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;t-Steel:  I&#039;m with Jill, your addition is PRICELESS and so true!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;rureddy:  &quot;Obama supporters would like nothing better than for Hillary to exit...&quot;&lt;br&gt;As an Obama supporter I am happy to let the last contest happens on June 3.  But after the people have had their say I do want a quick resolution and the second-place candidate to step aside and not take the fight to Denver.  I do expect Obama to receive the nomination, but this is one race where even this late in the game I&#039;m not going to claim that Obama as the nominee is a sure thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill, I love the guide- thanks!</p>
<p>t-Steel:  I&#39;m with Jill, your addition is PRICELESS and so true!</p>
<p>rureddy:  &#8220;Obama supporters would like nothing better than for Hillary to exit&#8230;&#8221;<br />As an Obama supporter I am happy to let the last contest happens on June 3.  But after the people have had their say I do want a quick resolution and the second-place candidate to step aside and not take the fight to Denver.  I do expect Obama to receive the nomination, but this is one race where even this late in the game I&#39;m not going to claim that Obama as the nominee is a sure thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138284</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138284</guid>
		<description>Jill, I love the guide- thanks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;t-Steel:  I&#039;m with Jill, your addition is PRICELESS and so true!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;rureddy:  &quot;Obama supporters would like nothing better than for Hillary to exit...&quot;&lt;br&gt;As an Obama supporter I am happy to let the last contest happens on June 3.  But after the people have had their say I do want a quick resolution and the second-place candidate to step aside and not take the fight to Denver.  I do expect Obama to receive the nomination, but this is one race where even this late in the game I&#039;m not going to claim that Obama as the nominee is a sure thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill, I love the guide- thanks!</p>
<p>t-Steel:  I&#39;m with Jill, your addition is PRICELESS and so true!</p>
<p>rureddy:  &#8220;Obama supporters would like nothing better than for Hillary to exit&#8230;&#8221;<br />As an Obama supporter I am happy to let the last contest happens on June 3.  But after the people have had their say I do want a quick resolution and the second-place candidate to step aside and not take the fight to Denver.  I do expect Obama to receive the nomination, but this is one race where even this late in the game I&#39;m not going to claim that Obama as the nominee is a sure thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138266</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138266</guid>
		<description>Now all that&#039; s needed is for McCain to chuckle or snicker on the airwaves and ask aloud, &quot;How long does the cycle take?  28 days?  Oh, this is Obama, not Clinton voters...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now all that&#39; s needed is for McCain to chuckle or snicker on the airwaves and ask aloud, &#8220;How long does the cycle take?  28 days?  Oh, this is Obama, not Clinton voters&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138271</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138271</guid>
		<description>Now all that&#039; s needed is for McCain to chuckle or snicker on the airwaves and ask aloud, &quot;How long does the cycle take?  28 days?  Oh, this is Obama, not Clinton voters...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now all that&#39; s needed is for McCain to chuckle or snicker on the airwaves and ask aloud, &#8220;How long does the cycle take?  28 days?  Oh, this is Obama, not Clinton voters&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138277</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138277</guid>
		<description>Now all that&#039; s needed is for McCain to chuckle or snicker on the airwaves and ask aloud, &quot;How long does the cycle take?  28 days?  Oh, this is Obama, not Clinton voters...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now all that&#39; s needed is for McCain to chuckle or snicker on the airwaves and ask aloud, &#8220;How long does the cycle take?  28 days?  Oh, this is Obama, not Clinton voters&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djshay</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138263</link>
		<dc:creator>djshay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138263</guid>
		<description>Hillary didn&#039;t give a crap about FL and MI until she saw she needed them&lt;br&gt;to get ahead of Obama. When the decision was made to punish these 2&lt;br&gt;states, why didn&#039;t she say something then? If she&#039;s soooo concerned&lt;br&gt;about the voters, why didn&#039;t she protest way back when the decision was&lt;br&gt;made?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary didn&#39;t give a crap about FL and MI until she saw she needed them<br />to get ahead of Obama. When the decision was made to punish these 2<br />states, why didn&#39;t she say something then? If she&#39;s soooo concerned<br />about the voters, why didn&#39;t she protest way back when the decision was<br />made?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djshay</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/comment-page-2/#comment-138264</link>
		<dc:creator>djshay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/19825/riverdaughters-pocket-guide-to-the-obamaniac-behavior-cycle/#comment-138264</guid>
		<description>Hillary didn&#039;t give a crap about FL and MI until she saw she needed them&lt;br&gt;to get ahead of Obama. When the decision was made to punish these 2&lt;br&gt;states, why didn&#039;t she say something then? If she&#039;s soooo concerned&lt;br&gt;about the voters, why didn&#039;t she protest way back when the decision was&lt;br&gt;made?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary didn&#39;t give a crap about FL and MI until she saw she needed them<br />to get ahead of Obama. When the decision was made to punish these 2<br />states, why didn&#39;t she say something then? If she&#39;s soooo concerned<br />about the voters, why didn&#39;t she protest way back when the decision was<br />made?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

