2. Prior to Super Tuesday, Hillary Clinton was the obvious leader with Obama an also-ran. This reversed after Super Tuesday and incrementally since then Obama's lead has grown. It's sad for Clinton because this is probably her last chance to seek the Presidency, but so many excitable youth (largely, though not exclusively, still in younger-adult years) she had likely planned to expect to have the support of, have idealized and selected Obama instead.

3. Kennedy giving a speech at the Democratic convention would be especially powerful given his latest medical discovery; with respect to which candidate he would support, obviously it would be the one he has endorsed, namely Obama.

4. Black Americans are arguably the most “loyal” or lockstep-partisan voters in this country, at nineties per cent plus Democratic. I don't believe they would refuse to vote en masse if Clinton were nominated and I don't believe they would vote for McCain across the USA any more than they would in the city of Washington, DC. (The Federal District is a sea of Democratic posters prior to elections — a fascinating, perversely pleasing challenge is to find one, just one, Republican campaign sign within the downtown area or any other part of the city other than the Northwest. The Dem-GOP political trivia store in Union Station doesn't count!)

That should be a real winner of an argument. What happens to the Dems then when African-American refuse to vote for the white woman who played the race card every chance she had and robbed them of their first Presidential nominee. What does it say about the Democratic party in general to Hispanic voters as well?

Hey, that'd be fine for me, because I think McCain will beat her and she is toast for 2012 and on as a political threat.