Three Cheers for Triangulation

As a relatively practical business person I am a big fan. Almost every response to every problem is a balancing of choices.

There is no standard definition, but it is widely accepted that the term came into use during the Clinton administration and was coined by adviser Dick Morris.

Morris described triangulation in a PBS interview in 2000, saying:

Morris: Take the best from each party’s agenda, and come to a solution somewhere above the positions of each party. So from the left, take the idea that we need day care and food supplements for people on welfare. From the right, take the idea that they have to work for a living, and that there are time limits. But discard the nonsense of the left, which is that there shouldn’t be work requirements; and the nonsense of the right, which is you should punish single mothers. Get rid of the garbage of each position, that the people didn’t believe in; take the best from each position; and move up to a third way. And that became a triangle, which was triangulation.

In 2006 Morris more simply described it as “taking the best from the right and from the left and discarding the rest.”

Others have given their own take on it. Time magazine’s Joe Klein ventured in Three Cheers for Triangulation that “it proposed the achievement of liberal ends through market-oriented conservative means. Welfare reform, which combined a work requirement with significant financial incentives for the working poor, was the best example of how the philosophy might work.”

h/t Justin Bank at FactCheck.org

If the Democrats don’t achieve 60 votes in the Senate then I hope they choose to master this political technique rather than condemn us to death by a thousand stalemates. And I hope we can all learn to vote for candidates with a temperament to appreciate the merits in different points of view.