An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Bush’s Speech at Knesset an ‘Act of Lunacy’

How damaging to U.S. interests in the Arab world was President Bush’s speech to the Israeli Knesset? If Arab reaction is anything to go by, it will certainly guarantee the end of U.S. credibility as an honest broker for some time to come.

Here’s a sampling of reaction from the Egyptian press from the Egyptian Gazette:

The weekly Akhbar Al-Yom featured a front-page article that accused President Bush of blind support and partiality toward Israel and causing an uproar throughout Arab and Muslim communities. The article said in part:

“Bush’s outrageous comments in the Knesset will backfire on his alleged war on terror, providing added ammunition to terrorists and extremists who will now hit back and intensify their activities.”

Editor-in-Chief of Al-Gomhuria, Mohamed Ali Ibrahim, compared Bush’s speech to the Knesset unfavorably to one given by late Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in 1977 and said:

“‘This lunatic American president [Bush] took pride in the fact that his country was the first to recognize the independence of Israel and give U.S. cities Jewish names,’ concluding that Bush had solicited support for Republican John McCain in the U.S. presidential race without considering whether such a act would increase hostilities toward American troops and the number of U.S. casualties, he concluded.”

May 17, 2008

Egypt – The Egyptian Gazette – Home Page (English)

Local press, columnists and writers yesterday launched a scathing attack on U.S. President George W. Bush for his “provocative” speech marking the 60th anniversary of the Jewish state at the Israeli Knesset.

The weekly Akhbar Al-Yom featured a front-page article that accused Bush of blind support and partiality toward Israel and causing an uproar throughout Arab and Muslim communities. Moreover, the paper stressed accusations by Middle East political observers who insisted that Bush’s speech undermined his country’s credibility as the central peace-broker in the region.

Worried about the outlook for stability and peace in the Middle East, Akhbar Al-Yom said observers are unanimous that Bush’s speech brimmed with racism and prejudice. The paper charged, “Bush’s outrageous comments in the Knesset will backfire on his alleged war on terror, providing added ammunition to terrorists and extremists who will now hit back and intensify their activities.”

ACT OF LUNACY

In the meantime, Editor-in-Chief of Al-Gomhuria, Mohamed Ali Ibrahim, made a striking comparison between Bush’s speech to the Knesset and a speech given in 1977 by late Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, who at the time was celebrated in the same building as the hero of peace and war. Ibrahim pointed out that in the audience of Sadat’s speech consisted of hawks like Golda Mayer, Moshe Dayan and Shimon Peres, “who instigated the Israeli aggression and occupation of Arab land. Conversely, Bush’s speech was addressed to the weakest generation of Israeli leaders yet, all of whom occupied the first rows in the Knesset. Moreover, the speaker [Bush] is the lamest duck and worst President in the American history,” writes Ibrahim. He added that Sadat had confronted his foes courageously and called for peace in the Middle East and a halt to hostilities and bloodshed between Israelis and Arabs.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing foreign press coverage of the Middle East reaction to President Bush’s trip.

  • StockBoySF
    So Bush remains true to form and we're surprised?
  • DLS
    Any speech to Israel that is pro-Israel is going to inflame the Usual Suspects in the Middle East. They really don't have excuses, and they're in a far stronger position than anyone behaving or reacting in a similar way back here at home.
  • saintixe56
    It may be interesting to see if Bush comments whether aimed at Democrats during a birthday party where he was just a guest whether approving/disapproving the dismantling of Serbia, in fact any comment at all are considered relevant by the international community. I shall not discuss wheter 70% ogf americans in the US ggive them any value. Bush for all his good or bad deeds, has entered the sunset zone. Every president gets to that zone. Chirac for all his very own good and bad deeds was held no more relevant when the french election started moving when the candidates became official. Much Blair credit was at his lowest ebb, when all Britain knew G Brown was going to succeed him. My comment: much ado about nothing.
    The guy knows he has earned the duisrespect of half his counrtymen, teh other half despises him; the international playres are quietly discussing with the contenders so at least when one of the 3 is elected , he/she will not be a mystery man. But poor Bush has only this card to play, be outrageous, say stupid things let the media speak about them so he can prve he is still alive, still relevant.
    True to form, which was a rather unintelligent vapid man who got elected in Texas because they thought his vapidness meant a diffident yet decent man , when it just meant to be ...vacant. The only smart player is Master Darth Cheney himself. Aside leading the strings of Scarecrow Bush, he tries to well salvage the republican party even if it means smiling pretty to McCAin ; will it be enough ...
    so please take Bush comments for what they are just noice and windbags; already the internationaljournalists are discussing something else and not poor Bush. Evean a vacant mind has its pride, though I was surprised to know that it is located in a swing golf bag...
  • kritt11
    True to type, Bush continues to exhibit petty partisanship and missed an opportunity to appear presidential and conciliatory. I can't wait for November when members of the sinking USS Republica start throwing him overboard to preserve their own precious hides.
  • Any speech to Israel that is pro-Israel is going to inflame the Usual Suspects in the Middle East.

    Is it a pro-Israel to liken 64% of Israelis to Nazi appeasers?
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC