An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Clinton, Obama Supporters Meet To Talk About Unity And Defeating McCain (UPDATED)

There are concrete signs that the seemingly irreconcilable camps of Democratic Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are moving to begin planning on how to merge their efforts to focus on beating presumptive GOP Presidential nominee Senator John Mccain in November’s general election.

Quite a few pundits (including me) have suggested it looked almost impossible for the Clinton and Obama camps to put aside their differences and keep the eye on the electoral prize after such an acrimonious, divisive and grudge-inducing campaign. But this could prove to be yet ANOTHER bit of 2008 conventional wisdom that in the end proves to be a crock:

Top fundraisers for Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama have begun private talks aimed at merging the two candidates’ teams, not waiting for the Democratic nominating process to end before they start preparations for a hard-fought fall campaign.

The Washington Post paints a picture of supporters of two campaigns that want to hit the ground running once there’s only one candidate left to make sure the Democrats don’t hit the ground and fall on their faces due to being unready and divided in the difficult campaign to come:

Despite Obama’s apparently insurmountable lead in delegates needed to claim the nomination, aides to both candidates are resigned to the idea that the Democratic contest will continue at least through June 3, when Montana and South Dakota will cast the final votes of the primary season.

But in small gatherings around Washington and in planning sessions for party unity events in New York and Boston in coming weeks, fundraisers and surrogates from both camps are discussing how they can put aside the vitriol of the past 18 months and move forward to ensure that the eventual nominee has the resources to defeat Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) in November.

Mark Aronchick, a Philadelphia lawyer who has raised more than $1 million for Clinton’s bid, said that while her supporters have not given up on their candidate, they recognize the need to start preparing for the general election.

“Only if we do this right, and see this through in the right way, will there be a chance for a full, rapid and largely complete unification of the party,” Aronchick said.

According to the Washington Post, some 35 Clinton and Obama supporters met in Washington last week at a hotel for what Aronchick called a “”grope towards unity.”
To be sure, this ability of these Clinton and Obama supporters to look at their party’s overall goals and begin planning to merge operations to battle as Democrats versus Hillary or Obama supports is not unanimous.

You can see Internet comments and posts that suggest that if one candidate or another is nominated, the defeated candidate’s supporters won’t got for him/her.

And there are some Clinton supporters that insist she has lost mostly due to a ’sexist” campaign. Some of them say they’ll vote for McCain and try to defeat superdelegates that don’t back Clinton. Two members who say they “represent a group of thousands and of women who are very upset” even went on Bill O’Reilly, who peppered them challenging questions. WATCH THE VIDEO HERE.

But with polls showing this could be a blowout Democratic year, Congressional Republicans open showing signs of political flop sweat and near panic, McCain trying desperately to discreetly pull himself away from the most unpopular President in modern history and George Bush yanking him back in or hurting him with his high visibility, logic would dictate that the Democrats will unify and run a more cohesive and smarter political game.

However, logic has not always prevailed in past election years when it seemed “certain” the Democrats would capture the White House. And there are no “givens” on the outcome this election day.

But given Obama’s adept response to Bush’s “appeasement charge” this week, given how Democratic candidates cross the nation can taste this being a Democratic year, and given the fact that the more long-range-goal oriented and less emotional supporters of the Clinton-Obama camps are meeting, perhaps logic will prevail this year…

UPDATE: Be sure to read The Field HERE which has a related post. (We’ve now added The Field to the TMV blogroll under Left Voices, but it’s more center left so we may switch it or add it to Other Voice. But it will be on the TMV blogroll, which we use extensively for doing our posts).

  • superdestroyer
    Of course they are going to come together. How else are all of the former Clinton staffers ever going to get a job in the new administration? With a Democratic Party rout of the Republicans being the most likely scenerio, there will plenty of jobs open for the next generation of Rahm Emanuels wannabes. They will say and do what it takes to make Senator Obama happy so that they can add to their resumes.
  • StockBoySF
    "And there are some Clinton supporters that insist she has lost mostly due to a ’sexist” campaign. Some of them say they’ll vote for McCain and try to defeat superdelegates that don’t back Clinton."

    I don't think too many disaffected Hillary supporters will end up supporting McCain. Certainly some of them will... but true supporters will not turn their backs on her when she calls for their support. Particularly if she's VP or wrangles some plum position.

    It would sort of be like a fundraiser asking for a million dollars from some donor, but when offered $500,000, that fundraiser turns down the money because it's not what they wanted for their cause.
  • DLS
    "How else are all of the former Clinton staffers ever going to get a job in the new administration?"

    Obama fans are incredibly naive if they doubt the Dem establishment with its long-term well-established apparatus in Washington wouldn't seize and exploit an Obama presidency for its own benefit.

    It's not as though Obama is breaking from the past. Wasn't he relying on none other than Brzezinski for foreign policy advice? He's made use, then, of at least one Carter-era "retread" and DC fixture more substantial than what the Clintons did in their first term in office. (What's worse, old-Dem fixtures or another round of activists who are "indirect fixtures" due to their celebrity, such as putting Krugman in charge of the Treasury Department?)

    The only innovative thing I can see in an Obama presidency (not specific to him, either) would be to scrap the long-obsolescent and Northeastern-conceited name of the Interior Department for a new name, Department of Natural Resources (not "the Environment"!) and putting Al Gore or some other environmentalist in charge of it to show the obvious emphasis of the new administration's agenda.
  • StockBoySF
    DLS, whether the Dept. of the Interior is renamed or not isn't that important to me, but I think you have an excellent suggestion that a true environmentalist should be in charge. I'm tired of the energy companies dictating environmental policy.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC