An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

How little we read

Usability expert Jakob Nielsen reports:

On the average Web page, users have time to read at most 28% of the words during an average visit; 20% is more likely.

We’ve known since our first studies of how users read on the Web that they typically don’t read very much. Scanning text is an extremely common behavior for higher-literacy users; our recent eyetracking studies further validate this finding.

The only thing we’ve been missing is a mathematical formula to quantify exactly how much (or how little) people read online. Now, thanks to new data, we have this as well.

Don’t anybody tell Cory Doctorow! He’s a big advocate of the screen as book. He says the word “book” should be a verb and not a noun:

[My transcription beginning @ 43:20] Book is what you do when you’re reading. Book is not a literary form, because obviously we have literary forms that we’ve called books that weren’t published in book form starting with the Bible… That book was a scroll. You know, it wasn’t in book form at all. And then we have books like Charles Dickens books which were in fact published in newspapers as serials.

So clearly it’s not a literary form and it’s not a physical object, it’s a practice. It’s the thing that you do when you are reading things that are book-like… Book is not a thing, it’s a verb, it’s not a noun. So I think that when you consider that more people read more words off of more screens every day, and fewer people read fewer words off of fewer pages every day, then we have to conclude that what people are doing with screens is book.

Come to think of it, how many of those NYTimes best sellers do you want to bet are sitting on people’s coffee tables and lining their book shelves unread?

I’m guessing at most 28%; 20% is more likely!

  • DLS
    "what people are doing with screens is book"

    He should learn English. There are no new rules. (verb vs. noun)
  • runasim
    Reading web screens may be 'book" time, ', but it's not he same experience as reading a book. Not even close.

    It may not matter so much, if the reader is after data, news reports or factual information. But literature is just not literature in the same way on the screen as it is in your hand. When you physically hold a book, it becomes a part of you in a way staring at a screen never can. Keeping a book on a shelf extends the relationship.

    Books on a shelf are like photos in an album. They keep you close to previous parts of a life. I associate each book with the period when I bought it and first discussed it. I have more trouble remembering when I've re-read books, because the first reading is more emotionally meaningful, even when rereeadings offer more intellectually.

    Besides that, you just can't curl up with a screen on a rainy day like you can with a book.
  • JWindish
    I used to hate reading on screens; now I love it. What's worse, I prefer it! The reason: hyperlinks and search. And it has changed how I read. I'm not sure whether that's good or bad.

    I definitely read less long-form. Fewer books. But now when I do read a book, at the same time I read reviews and discussion surrounding the book, listen to podcasts of lectures by the author, and engage in discussion of the book. So it's a different experience. A more three-dimensional and engaged experience.

    Once the technology improves to the point where the screen is as good as paper -- as light and flexible and clear and bright, and with long-lasting batteries -- then I can imagine switching.

    I am no techno-utopian, however. Then, I fear, my reading can be controlled and monitored. I can be charged per-word or per-page or per-minute or per-hour. Technology can control me as easily as it can free me!
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC