An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

The Old Guy vs. The Black Guy

obama_mccain.jpg

One of the wags at The Onion wrote the other day that the number of acceptable phrases that a presidential candidate can use has dropped from 38 at the beginning of 2007 to a mere four.

They are:

Thank you all for coming, God bless America, These pancakes are great, and Death to the infidels.

Like all great humor, there is an element of truth to this, which leads me somewhat circuitously to get the jump on what is sure to be one of the more provocative story lines of the fall phase of the 2008 steel cage match for the White House.

That the race will be between a septuagenarian and an African-American.

John McCain’s age and Barack Obama’s skin color certainly would have come up however directly or indirectly. But we owe a debt of thanks (cough, cough) to Hillary and Bill Clinton for shamelessly lowering racial “discourse” to limbo-bar level.

Perhaps this is just the Clintons’ strange way of reaching out to the Democratic Party’s most loyal constituency, but all it has done is drive blacks who were on the fence into Obama’s arms and further cement their legacy as a destructive team of which I can recall no spousal antecedent in American politics. (John and Abigail Adams didn’t behave that way, did they?)

My own view is simple:

Many factors were fair game as to whether Hillary was qualified to be president, but not her gender.

Many factors are fair game as to whether Obama is qualified to be president, but not his race.

Age, however, is an entirely different matter when combined with McCain’s refusal to share his health records, and these factors demand to be discussed.

  • CStanley
    Well, Shaun, I assume you can discuss the health factors in just a couple of weeks, as even the NYT smear piece which insinuated that McCain might be hiding his health records had to admit that he's going to release all of the records on May 23.
  • Pete Abel
    Sidebar: in the workplace, federal law prevents discrimination on the basis of race, gender, and (yes) age (40+, specifically). Not that the workplace rules should be relevant to the search for a new president ... or should they? I don't now. (Not trying to pick a fight, Shaun -- just tossing this in for discussion, in case anyone cares to take it up.)
  • CStanley
    I think it's an interesting point but I really don't think those rules should apply. In my mind, the anti-discriminatory laws are to prevent an individual or small group of individuals from using illegitimate criteria based on bigotry to select an employee. In the case of voting, the effects of bigotry have to be assumed to be diluted by the number of people who are doing the selecting; I think that any voter who uses a discriminatory mindset to select a candidate is an ass, but I don't think it is possible for the law to speak to that. Unfortunately people have the right to be asses, and it's up to the rest of us to try to be the counterbalance to that.
  • Lit3Bolt
    Ok, does nobody remember Reagan? You just don't "suddenly" get diagnosed with Alzheimer's. There's a prodrome of symptoms ranging from months to years, until it gets obvious even to family members that Granddaddy's or Grandmommy's memory is pretty bad. People shouldn't be discrimnated on the mere basis of age, tis true, but we don't allow blind people to drive a car or allow deaf people to operate a 911 call center for valid reasons. So if McCain is the president, I don't want him being controlled by neocon aides. With Reagan, it got bad enough that he couldn't even lie effectively lie about the Iran-Contra affair. It was unmentionable then, but the issue can and should be raised now.
  • runasim
    I think the Onion has the most reasonble take on this.

    Just reading some of he comments on TMV makes me realize that there is almost nothing that won't be spun (and I do mean) spun) out of control.

    Language has no more meaning.

    What does 'fair game' mean, for example? That everythng about a candidate should be considered suspect until proven otherwise?

    Besdies, you can adopt any rules you want, and it's dead certian that every one of them will be broken.
  • CStanley
    Lit3bolt: The experts don't agree with your assessment of Reagan. One person who researched it and wrote an acclaimed book was David Shenk, and he had this to say:
    Wallace, N.C.: Do you think that Ronald Reagan had Alzheimer's during his term as president?

    David Shenk: Everyone wants to know that about Reagan, understandably. The short answer is no -- he did not have diagnosable Alzheimer's in the White House.

    Alzheimer's is a progressive disease that creeps up very very slowly, and it was certainly creeping up on him during the late years of his Presidency. He knew that better than anyone, and joked frequently in speeches and with his White House doctors. But it's clear from looking at the evidence that his memory troubles in the White House were much too slight to be considered Alzheimer's.

    I don't disagree with your basic premise, that it could have been a possibility that memory lapses would have affected his judgment. I don't think it would be a bad idea for it to either be required or presumptively required (with pressure coming to bear from voters) for all presidents to be screened before and during the presidency- and with extra emphasis on older candidates as determined by the relative risk factors that the medical experts ascertain. We've pretty much come to expect the reports on the president's annual physical, and perhaps it's time to consider having them get a mental fitness screening too.
  • DLS
    "Many factors were fair game as to whether Hillary was qualified to be president, but not her gender.

    Many factors are fair game as to whether Obama is qualified to be president, but not his race.

    Age, however, is an entirely different matter when combined with McCain’s refusal to share his health records, and these factors demand to be discussed."

    Anything to bash McCain now that Obama looks likely to be the Dem nominee, right? Well, if age matters, Obama is too young and inexperienced compared to McCain.
  • StockBoySF
    "Anything to bash McCain now that Obama looks likely to be the Dem nominee, right? Well, if age matters, Obama is too young and inexperienced compared to McCain."

    Well, if McCain has memory or other mental issues which prevent him from remembering or applying his experience to the decisions he makes as president then what good IS his experience?
  • StockBoySF
    As long as there is a reasonable expectation that McCain can perform the job as president, both mentally and physically, for the next four years then his health shouldn't be an issue. In four years we get to reevaluate his health and determine if he can continue. (The same is true of all candidates.)

    Having said that, being president is a demanding mental challenge and coupled with the impact of his decisions, the bar for being "mentally fit" should be higher than just being "competent". I would hope that the American people want a president who can exercise good judgement and be able to make sound decisions at 3 am. Obviously the president has to take many considerations into factor when making decisions- whether during a crises or filling empty posts (I'm tired of Bush's incompetent appointees screwing things up) which require a nimble mind.

    So I reserve any judgement about McCain's mental and physical health until a full release of his medical records, including a complete mental evaluation, is done.
  • CStanley
    Well, if age matters, Obama is too young and inexperienced compared to McCain.

    LOL, a variant on Reagan's excellent retort during the debates "I will not make my opponent's youth and inexperience an issue."

    Stockboy, I agree about reserving judgment. Frankly I wouldn't be surprised if McCain dumps a huge load of records on May 23, including vigorous mental health screenings, and then stands at the podium and says, "Any questions?" (staying to answer every last one, instead of complaining after eight questions ;-) )

    It would be just his style, but we'll see. Meanwhile, any speculations are just hot air and attempts to smear by insinuation.
  • Voters may be just as inclined to use their own experience, though. Those young voters flocking to Obama for example; it's not discrimination or ugly evil for them to think "McCain is older than grandpa, and I see him and his friends as old and retired and past their prime."

    Older voters, in polls, have more bias against older candidates than 30somethings or 40somethings. They (we) see the changes in our own razor sharp edge; can't pull up the name of that associate's wife like I used to; that sprain is taking so long to heal, etc. They know from personal experience that fit and lively though they are, there are undeniable effects on mind and body of advancing age.
  • elrod
    Barring any evidence that McCain is in bad health, his age should be irrelevant. Supreme Court justices serve into their high 80s.

    I have plenty of reasons to vote against John McCain - notably, the issues. But age is not one of them.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC