An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Does RNC Have 2,200 Pages Oppo Research On Clinton And Obama?

How dirty does the upcoming 2008 campaign promise to be? The focus has been on what the GOP might try to do to Democratic Senator Barack Obama if he gets the Democratic presidential nomination. But MSNBC’s David Shuster contends that the Republicans also have a treasure chest of goodies ready to use against Senator Hillary Clinton if she heads the ticket:

Two Republican officials at the Republican National Committee who are involved in “opposition research efforts” in preparation for the general election say the RNC’s oppo research dossier on Sen. Clinton runs more than 1,200 pages in length.

FYI: In some newsrooms two sources (not named in the story but revealed to editors) are enough to confirm a story. Some editors insist on three if it’s a huge development. MORE:

According to these officials, the book includes “previously undisclosed information about Hillary Clinton’s connections to the Whitewater scandal, travel office firings, and Democratic fundraising efforts.” Given that the book has not been shared with us, we’ve been unable to confirm this assertion. Furthermore, the Republican officials would not describe the nature of the “new information.”

However, I was not directed away from a front-page story in today’s Washington Times about memos/documents from the estate of Sam Dash, Ken Starr’s ethics adviser during the early stages of the Whitewater investigation. The Dash Whitewater memos and documents have been turned over to the Library of Congress (where they were presumably available to the Washington Times reporter/researcher). The documents reportedly show that prosecutors concluded that Hillary Clinton concealed information and misled a federal grand jury about her work for the Savings and Loan at the heart of the Whitewater investigation. The allegation that she concealed and misled is not new, and was sourced by reporters who covered the investigation in the 1990s (including me) to “attorneys close to Starr” or “sources in the office of the independent counsel.

The documents from Dash’s estate, however, mark the first available “documentary evidence” that Ken Starr’s office drafted a criminal indictment of Senator Clinton, also known as a “pros memo” and debated verbally and through written memos whether Clinton should actually face charges.

According to Shuster, they decided not to go after Clinton because they had doubts about the strength of their evidence and their ability to convict a first lady.

But such memos, documents, and etc. about the internal debate in the office of the independent counsel could be a gold mine for negative ads, etc.

So this means Obama is pristine and won’t face negative campaigning that will fill hours of air time for Sean and Rush et al? Hardly.

By the way, to put the RNC’s opposition research effort into context, I’m told the dossier on Senator Obama is 1,000 pages in length and that Republican researchers spent a few weeks in Chicago recently collecting information on Obama’s ties to the Weather Underground” and separately to Tony Rezko (who is currently on trial for federal corruption charges).

The difference here is: Clinton’s campaign has been saying she is totally vetted and that there is nothing new that can come out or be used against her. If there are some alleged 1,200 pages to play with, it’s unlikely that she’d face a free issue-oriented path to the White House.

Prediction: The formidable slime/distraction machine will run…no matter who is the Democratic nominee.

  • daveinboca
    Uh, the Dems are also full of lots of slime/distraction they can throw at the Repubs. It's just that generally the Repubs' mud sticks to the wall because

    1] the Dems have the edge on more sleazy monetary transactions &

    2] the Repubs are more competent in most complex multifaceted operations, given that more military & corporate backgrounds requiring actual skill-sets are to be found in the Repub ranks. Call it the Shrum rule.

    The Dems DO have a slight edge on pop psychological tricks, & can gull the gullible & inexperienced young.
    Plus they have identity politics, which in '08 is a two-edged sword which will cut them more than their opponents.

    Read Jeffrey Goldberg's outstanding analysis in The New Yorker [google him & it will come up] on the Democrats to understand why they always delude themselves more than the average voter, who is smarter than they think.

    I know some of this because I worked on the National Staff of two Dem prez campaigns & have seen their sausage-making techniques first-hand. Plus a few Senate & House races.

    Also, Hillary may not accept a VP slot simply to avoid a lot of the true facts the Repubs have accumulated on her many quasi-legal or illegal missteps in the past.
  • Don Quijote
    Read Jeffrey Goldberg's outstanding analysis in The New Yorker [google him & it will come up] on the Democrats to understand why they always delude themselves more than the average voter, who is smarter than they think.


    The average voter is a clueless moron who would have a hard time finding Canada on a map of the world. Why do you think we ended up with Shrub in the White House? Why do you think that despite being in the process of losing two wars, having record trade deficit & record budget deficits, having 80% of the population saying that the country is on the wrong track, McCain is running neck & neck with both Obama & Hillary?

    As far throwing dirt at Hillary, at this point in time it's not going to work, people who hate her will believe in the dirt, and the people who hate the people who hate her (not the same thing as liking her ) will dismiss it as more pointless crap from the people who hate her. It's what happens when throw shit against the wall for twenty years, and have not been able to make anything stick.
  • runasim
    The practice of digging up dirt and other means of character assasination disgusts me.
    Treating this like a sport ,i.e. who is more competent at it, is equally repellent.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC