Comments on: Clinton to Obama: A Translation

By: runasim

runasim — Fri, 09 May 2008 09:18:28 +0000

I can't get over the 'consistently said' part.
She consistenrly says things until it turns out that consisitently saying the opposite works better.

I would be more supportive if she just made an argument for her current proposal, without the blah-blah-blah.

By: JSpencer

JSpencer — Thu, 08 May 2008 23:42:29 +0000

We Michigan folks were deprived of anything even remotely approaching a legitimate primary. There is no fair way to seat the delegates, except perhaps 50-50, which is the same as not seating them at all.

By: Slamfu

Slamfu — Thu, 08 May 2008 23:42:22 +0000

Lol even shorter and sweeter.

"I expect you support my efforts to count the votes where you weren't even on the ballot, and if you don't I'm going to once again try to discredit you in the eyes of America."

Its been working wonders for her and the Democratic party in general so far right?

By: DLS

DLS — Thu, 08 May 2008 21:46:36 +0000

How different it is now, than earlier:

"We believe Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina play a unique and special role in the nominating process.

And we believe the DNC’s rules and its calendar provide the necessary structure to respect and honor that role.

Thus, we will be signing the pledge to adhere to the DNC approved nominating calendar."