An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Infidelity: An American Social and Political Obsession

If one wanted to know the difference between being an American and being a European, this article from France’s Le Figaro newspaper would be a very good place to start.

From Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky to client number nine Eliot Spitzer and ‘Kristan,’ Europeans have looked at the effect that sex has on American politics with a collective shake of the head.

In discussing the first press conference of New York’s new governor David Patterson, Pascal Bruckner writes for Le Figaro:

“A few weeks ago when the new Democratic governor of New York, David Patterson, a blind man, succeeded the once-incorruptible Eliot Spitzer who was found guilty of frequenting call girls, what did he do first? He called a press conference to confess to having cheated on his wife several times with colleagues from his office. … This stupefies Europeans, who still remember the outrageous Lewinsky affair: instead of announcing his political program, here is an official repenting out of fear that his exploits will one day be exposed to the public. In short, the world’s leading power, which is currently losing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which has revived the practice of torture and twice in-a-row elected one of the most incompetent heads of state in modern times, is up in arms over these measly tales of sleeping around!”

Bruckner goes on to recommend:

“Americans should be urged to take lessons in civilization from the old world: on this side of the Atlantic, as shown in cinema, literature and theater, everyone cheats and is cheated on, and people survive the infidelity of their partner. Real fidelity is more demanding than a strict physical abstinence, and if the love is strong, it will overcome these episodes.”

By Pascal Bruckner

Translated By Kate Davis

April 30, 2008

France – Le Monde – Original Article (French)
A few weeks ago when the new Democratic governor of New York, David Patterson, a blind man, succeeded the once-incorruptible Eliot Spitzer who was found guilty of frequenting call girls, what did he do first? He called a press conference to confess to having cheated on his wife several times with colleagues from his office.

His wife, in turn, acknowledged some escapades of her own, and swore that she and her husband had overcome these challenges. This stupefies Europeans, who still remember the outrageous Lewinsky affair: instead of announcing his political program, here is an official repenting out of fear that his exploits will one day be exposed to the public. In short, the world’s leading power, which is currently losing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which has revived the practice of torture and twice in-a-row elected one of the most incompetent heads of state in modern times, is up in arms over these measly tales of sleeping around!

What’s going on when the entire press, from the gutter papers to the very serious New York Times, covers this private matter ad infinitum? Let us recall the disappointments of former Democratic Governor Eliot Spitzer: a destroyer of financial corruption and a champion of the fight against prostitution, he himself frequented a ravishing 22-year-old brunette, Ashley Youmans, alias Kristen, for whose services he was paying between $1,000 and $5,000, drawing on, it seems, money from his campaign fund.

Here again, nothing out of the ordinary for an old European with broad experience in the unpredictability of human nature: like Captain Haddock , blind drunk and chairing a meeting against alcoholism, the fathers of modesty in the United States, the enemies of vice, of feminism and of the freedom of morals, invariably end up in the arms of prostitutes, their nostrils filled with cocaine and their hands in the safe. Every moralist eventually ends up falling one day into the sin he denounces: isn’t the Catholic Church itself, which advocates chastity and subjects homosexuals to public obloquy, covering up the actions of thousands of pedophile priests who rape and abuse children?

The first lesson from old Europe: Beware of any virtuous discourse. Eros takes revenge on her critics and delivers a formidable kick in the nose to the prevailing Puritanism. What should we think about these American family therapy associations that explain that “the reactions of a betrayed wife resemble the symptoms of post-traumatic stress shown by the victims of traumatic events,” like September 11, 2001? What can be said about the seminars for unfaithful spouses who are reeducated like dissidents in the former Soviet empire?

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated foreign press coverage of the United States.

  • superdestroyer
    Two points:

    1. If a politicians will will and cheat his/her spousen, the will even more easily screw over the citizens.

    2. I guess that the Europeans still like the idea of passing around the pretty young girls at the office. If the U.S. is going to have sexual harassment laws, then dating your subordinates and rewarding them for the sex is forbidden. I would bet that Europe does not have sexual harassment laws like the U.S and I know that they do not have the same number of lawyers.
  • runasim
    " If a politician... will cheat his/her spousen, the will even more easily screw over the citizens"
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There is no evidence whatsoever to supportt such an assertion., not in American history and not in European history.
    The obsession with the sex lives of other people threatens social stability far more than the indiscretions of any political leader in my reading of history and my observations of various other societies.

    I sometimes wonder how many fewer terrorists we would have if they didn;t spend so much time obsessing about making and enforcing laws governing sex.

    That's not to say that infidelity doesn't ccme with a price in heartache, even in Gay Paree. I've lent my shoulder to more than one European crying over the hurt the straying partner has caused. They work it out in private, however, no one judges, and the world continues its orbit around the sun. The crucial factor is not the infidelity per se, but whether or not support for the family unit, especially the children, is threatened.

    The US would do far better, IMO, if it stopped peeking through bedroom windows and started to prioritize its measures of morality in a more rational way.

    A far more likely clue to how someone will govern is how honestly he handles business and money matters and how wise he is in the use of power.
    Let's talk more about that instead of worrying about things that concern only the people involved.
  • superdestroyer
    Runasim,

    Are calling for the elimination of sexual harassment laws in the United States. Do you really want to go back to the good old days of 20 something busty secretaries that could not type? And yes, politicians lke Wilbur Mills to Gus savage were good at screwing over the electorate. If a politician feels comfortable indulging his desires at the office he will use tax dollars as well as the entry level employees.
  • runasim
    SD-

    Speculation aboutt dire consequences is neither evidence. nor proof. It's speculation. In this case, it's speculation contradicted by hsitoric evidenc.e

    If the politician didn't have to fear being persecuted for private matters, there would be no need to squander public money in order to camoflage infidelity or in order to evade being discovered. or blackmailed.
    It's the reaction to infidelity that causes the problem in the public realm, not the infidelity itself

    Hiring incompetent secretaries is exactly like hiring incompetent friends and political cronies, or granting them outrageous contracts that don't deliver value. Consider the money wasted and corruption involved in these cases.. In relative terms, the secretaries are a bargain.

    Sexual harassment is a form of mistreatment, like demanding kickbaks or political donations in return for favors or jobs. It's illegitimate to single out sex as a motivation when greed and power are so obviously omnipresent...

    The overriding error here is to put all misbehavior that involves sex into one bag.
    Being unfaithful is not the same as sexual harassment or misuse of public funds.
    Infidelity is no more a signal for subsequent misbehavior in other ways than playing checkers is an indication of a gambling addiction.

    Besides, I think obsesing about other people's private lives is bad for health, .
  • superdestroyer
    runasim,

    Bill Clinton has sex with a government employee and then gave her a job afterwards. Gary Condit had a history of hitting on young women in both Sacramento and DC.

    It is important how people behave when others are arguing. Using government employees to manage your sex life like Giuliani or Spitzer or using government jobs to award young women.

    The problem with private sex lives is that it nevers seem to stay in their private life. If a politician can pass the young women around the office, they will and their private life definitely indicates that they will.

    I find it humorous that the Democratic Party threw the feminist under the bus to save Bill Clinton. Now they cannot stand Bill Clinton. They abandoned their principles on sexual harassment and have made it virtually impossible to prove.

    I am surprised that you would be an enabler for bad boy behavior. If you expect others such as policemen or school students to behave themselves, the least we can do is expect politicians to behave themselves.
  • runasim
    SD-

    I find it amusing that people will discuss a topic without the ability to see past the headline news. Spitzer was caught becasue of a system set up to catch money laundering and financial support for terrorism groups. Had he been able to pay his friend in the daylinght, there would have been no reason for subtrefuge or camouflaged bank payments. It's not the sex, It's how the role of infidelity is groundlessly magnified .that causes the problem

    As for Lewinsky's feminism, she was obviously not one. She was not coerced. She was an adult woman responsible for her own choices, and she made bad ones. Responsibility is part of feminism, not cry-baby regret or paternalistic management.

    The discussion should be about corruption, not infidelity..
    You'll have to continue obsessing about sex without me.
    Enjoy.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC