<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote Of The Day: On The Clintons And Negative Campaigning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/19071/quote-of-the-day-on-the-clintons-and-negative-campaigning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19071/quote-of-the-day-on-the-clintons-and-negative-campaigning/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:56:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quote Of The Day: On The Clintons And Negative Campaigning</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19071/quote-of-the-day-on-the-clintons-and-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-111859</link>
		<dc:creator>politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quote Of The Day: On The Clintons And Negative Campaigning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/primaries/19071/quote-of-the-day-on-the-clintons-and-negative-campaigning/#comment-111859</guid>
		<description>[...] DAMOZEL wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt&#8230; as Karl Rove — George W. Bush’s master of the dark arts — destroyed Al Gore and John Kerry in 2000 and 2004, with tactics just as brutal but even more personal, then they will have driven American politics to a critical point. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DAMOZEL wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt&#8230; as Karl Rove — George W. Bush’s master of the dark arts — destroyed Al Gore and John Kerry in 2000 and 2004, with tactics just as brutal but even more personal, then they will have driven American politics to a critical point. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runasim</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/19071/quote-of-the-day-on-the-clintons-and-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-149080</link>
		<dc:creator>runasim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/primaries/19071/quote-of-the-day-on-the-clintons-and-negative-campaigning/#comment-149080</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s kind of hard to talk about Democrats as a group, because they&#039;ve always been a very wide umbrella assembly.    &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There has always been a hard core Party loyalty group, even a multi-generational loyalty one.  They might be attracted to turning the Rovian tables on opponents, if they see one candidate as the most likely to win the general election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then there are the acitivist left wingers, who also take no prisoners.and never consider consequences.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By and large, though,  people drift to voting Democratic because that&#039;s the antidote to Republican authoritarianism.  Their values and   interests are more likely to get  the attention of  a Democrat led government.   They are not loyal to a Party; they are  loyal to certain issues.  This is the group, I believe, who are repelled most by personal attakcs and are most likely to  reject rough and nasty political tactics.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, among Democrats there are also penty of the corrrupt and venal.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, when  someone talks about Democrats, I wonder: &quot;Which Democrats?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s kind of hard to talk about Democrats as a group, because they&#39;ve always been a very wide umbrella assembly.    </p>
<p>There has always been a hard core Party loyalty group, even a multi-generational loyalty one.  They might be attracted to turning the Rovian tables on opponents, if they see one candidate as the most likely to win the general election.</p>
<p>Then there are the acitivist left wingers, who also take no prisoners.and never consider consequences.</p>
<p>By and large, though,  people drift to voting Democratic because that&#39;s the antidote to Republican authoritarianism.  Their values and   interests are more likely to get  the attention of  a Democrat led government.   They are not loyal to a Party; they are  loyal to certain issues.  This is the group, I believe, who are repelled most by personal attakcs and are most likely to  reject rough and nasty political tactics.  </p>
<p>BTW, among Democrats there are also penty of the corrrupt and venal.  </p>
<p>So, when  someone talks about Democrats, I wonder: &#8220;Which Democrats?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
