An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales Can’t Find A Job

Barbados_Help_Wanted1.jpg

Once he was the nation’s Attorney General, appointed — and constantly protected and defended by — President George Bush. But he is considered by some to have been one of the worst Attorney Generals in recent history — and now Alberto Gonzales is having a hard time finding a job at a law firm.

Will he soon be applying for work at the temp agency Manpower?

Maybe not yet — but the New York Times reports that Gonzales is finding the response to his resume has not been enthusiastic:

Alberto R. Gonzales, like many others recently unemployed, has discovered how difficult it can be to find a new job. Mr. Gonzales, the former attorney general, who was forced to resign last year, has been unable to interest law firms in adding his name to their roster, Washington lawyers and his associates said in recent interviews.

He has, through friends, put out inquiries, they said, and has not found any takers. What makes Mr. Gonzales’s case extraordinary is that former attorneys general, the government’s chief lawyer, are typically highly sought.

A longtime loyalist to George W. Bush dating to their years together in Texas, Mr. Gonzales was once widely viewed as a strong candidate to be the first Hispanic-American nominated one day to the Supreme Court. A graduate of Harvard Law School, he carried an impressive personal story as the child of poor Mexican immigrants.

Despite those credentials, he left office last August with a frayed reputation over his role in the dismissal of several federal prosecutors and the truthfulness of his testimony about a secret eavesdropping program. He has had no full-time job since his resignation, and his principal income has come from giving a handful of talks at colleges and before private business groups.

“Frayed,” indeed. Any prospective employer from Mars who did not know who Gonzales is could do a Google search about his legacy and not be impressed by this, this, this, this, this, this or this.

But has there been a new development that won’t improve his legacy but will perhaps end even the remaining half-ounce of doubt about his role in “enhanced interrogation techniques” (the phrase used for “torture” by those defending the administration who apparently also like the phrase “pre-owned cars” instead of “used cars.”) and why he played the role.

Before he left office there were still some who felt Gonzales went along with orders from the top or allowed some others in the administration to relax countless administrations’ policies on torture. But new reports confirm what many suspected: there was indeed knowledge and approval at the very top. The ACLU is now calling for a special prosecutor.

That could never happen unless the Democrats win both the White House and Congress in November.

So in the meantime law firms are likely balking because (a) his legacy isn’t terrific (b) taking on Gonzales won’t be a great in for them if the Democrats take over (c) taking on Gonzales won’t be a great in for them if a Republican takes over. The reason for (c): Gonzales was sharply criticized by many Republicans and greatly disliked by conservatives, who effectively short-circuited a Bush trial balloon to nominate him to the Supreme Court.

So if you go to Manpower to fill out a temp application and see the guy next to you writing under the section that asks him to describe his previous job duties “To follow the boss’ orders” it could be you-know who.

But he will likely land something as time goes on: perhaps a newspaper column (but it may be hard since he is disliked by liberals and many conservatives) or a talking head contract on Fox News (but they weren’t enamored of him either) or a radio talk show (but he is voice and eloquence challenged). Or perhaps he’ll start a big blog (wanna exchange links?). After all, members of administrations have done that before.

Gonzales’ legacy also lives on in political cartoons. Here are two:
_CEC495B7_EE0C_420C_8568_12C47C5A5412_.gif
Mike Lane, Cagle Cartoons
_1383DC41_117A_4720_B5C9_47068B5A51F5_.gif
Pat Bagley, Salt Lake Tribune

  • StockBoySF
    Another reason law firms aren't lining up for Gonzales is that he viewed the AG job as a way to give Bush what Bush and his administration wanted. He was a yes man for Bush. The AG should ensure justice for all Americans and keep the government in check.

    I would question Gonzales' ethics, he placed personal interests (the Bush administration) ahead of the interests of the coumtry. He definitely did not show good judgement as a lawyer and all the world saw it.

    Good for law firms for not wanting to be tainted by a bad lawyer with poor priorities.
  • DLS
    Simply being a yes man doesn't qualify him to be a lobbyist. [grin] And it indeed is interesting how he is viewed as toxic waste, or at least unappealing, to so many.
  • kritt11
    If you watched Gonzo in action at any of the Senate hearings, it would definitely make you question the man's credibility. He came off as either a total idiot for failing to remember numerous recent key meetings and phone calls about the fired attorneys, or a pathological liar, who was obstructing justice. His non-answers to the Senators' pointed questions led to jaw-dropping disbelief and cynicism for anyone watching. He destroyed his own reputation for W--- hope it was worth it!
  • SteveK
    On April 20th, 2007 DLS said:

    The President believes that the Attorney General answered all of their questions honestly and forthrightly. I can understand there are some people who still don’t want to support the Attorney General
  • SteveK
    Edit doesn't work worth beans...

    My revised comment was meant to say:

    The President believes that the Attorney General answered all of their questions honestly and forthrightly. I can understand there are some people who still don’t want to support the Attorney General; that is their right. But he has done a fantastic job at the Department of Justice. He is our number one crime fighter. He has done so much to help keep this country safe from terrorists. He has worked determinately to prevent predators from attacking our children. He has worked — they have a fantastic record of fighting corruption in government and in keeping gang violence off our streets.

    And I could go on and on, but
    I think that following the hearing and following the tension that was in the room, I think on this new day I think — hopefully people will be able to take a step back, realize that there was no credible evidence of wrongdoing, that the Attorney General has apologized for how it was handled, and that he has a job to do, and he’s been doing it very well. And the President has full confidence in him.


    Thanks for revising your view DLS. You seem to have come closer to the truth this time 'round.
  • StockBoySF
    Gonzales and Bush on the day his resignation was accepted (link to Wikipedia):

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gonzalez-bus...
  • kritt11
    I'm wondering what it would take for the president to state that an appointee no longer has his full confidence and support. He has stayed loyal, even when his appointees have obviously failed the country----Gonzales, Alphonso Jackson, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld......
  • kritt11
    Oops---- Forgot Brownie! LOL
  • yes it hard difficult to find a new job when look this situation wright now.
  • crunch time as they say!
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC