An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Beijing Olympics & The Moral Low Ground

01aatibett.jpg

While it is unlikely that Newton noticed it the day he famously observed that apple falling to the ground, like gravity there is another immutable law of nature that goes something like this:

What goes around comes around.

And so it is with George Bush, who finds himself in the awkward if familiar position of having no moral gravitas, in this instance when it comes to condemning the People’s Republic of China for its latest violent crackdown on dissent in Tibet.

There was a time somewhere in the mists of my memory when the U.S., for all of its big-stick imperialist tendencies, did hold an approximation of the moral high ground, so that when a member of that international community of nations acted out against a minority or a neighbor the condemnation of the White House or State Department carried some weight.

No more.

While it should be noted in passing that no one would compare the U.S. to China when it comes to human rights abuses, the abuses sanctioned and committed by the Bush administration — up to and most prominently including the official endorsement of Nazi-like torture techniques and willful disregard for international treaties that protect the dignity and sanctity of life — make whatever protests the White House and State Department lodge against China to be hollow and, in the eyes of the world, downright laughable.

This brings us to the Beijing Olympics.

As I noted here, my bottom line is that the whole thing sucks to high heaven: The Chinese government sucks. The U.S. government sucks. The Olympics suck. And while I hugely admire the Dalai Lama and can forgive his militaristic roots, I would be remiss to not also mention that our gauzy, Hollywood-esque view of Tibet also sucks and is a few mantras short of a full prayer wheel.

Having gotten that out of the way, the fan dance that President Bush, presidential candidates and other bigs are doing over what the response to the crackdown in Tibet should be also is laughable.

At this writing, The Decider has decided to attend the opening ceremony, while Hillary Clinton and John McCain want him to boycott the ceremony but not the Olympics, as if that sends a signal. (Barack Obama was trying out for the Olympic bowling team and was unavailable for comment.)

To add a log to two to this bonfire, recall that neocon guru Richard Perle advocated preempting China’s bid for the 2008 Olympics after a U.S. spy plane and a Chinese jet fighter collided in what almost certainly was Chinese air space a few weeks after President Bush took office in 2001.

Perle, of course, turned out to be much better at helping start an unprovoked war in Iraq, which triggered the Bush administration’s determined march to the moral low ground, than punishing the Chinese. But then this post is about the laws of nature and cynicism, not irony.

Photograph by Robert Durrell/The Los Angeles Times

  • Excellent post. I had been entertaining writing something similar, at least as far as US hypocrisy is concerned.

    In your post said: "I would be remiss to not also mention that our gauzy, Hollywood-esque view of Tibet also sucks and is a few mantras short of a full prayer wheel."

    Along those same lines I'd like to point you to a post my friend Ian wrote for Why We Worry today. It talks in detail about our media's bias against China.
  • shaun
    ChrisWWW:

    Lest there be any misunderstanding (not by you but by others), I want to make it clear that my post is not indicative of a bias against China.

    In fact, I think that the Chinese Revolution was one of the most extraordinary events of the last millennium. Even allowing that it would take decades to move from an authoritarian dynastic system that enslaved its people to fulfilling the promise of the revolution, what came afterwards is so despicable in so many ways.

    The fact that the Tibetan people were enslaved by their Buddhist masters does not change Beijing's contemporary enslavement of those people.
  • shaun
    Shaun here again.

    Edgar Snow was writing the best stuff about China 50 years ago, today I would argue that it's James Fallows:

    http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/20...
  • Excellent link Shaun. Thanks.
  • runasim
    We created the Iraq tragedy because we didn't understand Iraq or its people.

    Having learned nothing, we move on to other parts of the globe, currently China.
    While peaceful demonstations might have caused China to rethink its global image problem, extreme measures like boycotts and attacking the torch are likely to have the opposite effect.
    The sight of mobs acting out is the very thing it fears most, for pete's sakes, and the public shaming of boycotts is likely to cause Beijing to draw inward and resort to even more harsh tactics.
    Being very nationalistic, the Chinese public would approve.
    If alienating both the regime and the public in China, what has been accomplished?

    I'm stunned and shocked to find that I agree with Pres. Bush and that Nancy Pelosi is dead wrong.

    Know your enemy before you rush into battle.
    Or, risk shooting yourself in a more vital part of anatomy than the foot.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC