<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Bad Economy News: Employers Cut Most Workers Since 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:39:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: runasim</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-143155</link>
		<dc:creator>runasim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 15:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/business/corporations/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/#comment-143155</guid>
		<description>I love it when people rush to quote carefully selected statistics to show that things aren&#039;t what they are..&lt;br&gt;Ask any of the people affected by the current state of the economy, now rising prices being an increasingly important factor, and they&#039;ll tell you things are bad.&lt;br&gt;And they won&#039;t care what  the definitions of a recession is, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when people rush to quote carefully selected statistics to show that things aren&#39;t what they are..<br />Ask any of the people affected by the current state of the economy, now rising prices being an increasingly important factor, and they&#39;ll tell you things are bad.<br />And they won&#39;t care what  the definitions of a recession is, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slamfu</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-143152</link>
		<dc:creator>Slamfu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/business/corporations/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/#comment-143152</guid>
		<description>Well the I&#039;m certainly not saying the folks at NBER don&#039;t know what they are talking about, but the macroeconomic definition is what I stated.   The one they give is a bit vague and a decline can be easily confused with merely not growing as fast we you were, yet still growing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the I&#39;m certainly not saying the folks at NBER don&#39;t know what they are talking about, but the macroeconomic definition is what I stated.   The one they give is a bit vague and a decline can be easily confused with merely not growing as fast we you were, yet still growing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikkel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-143151</link>
		<dc:creator>mikkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/business/corporations/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/#comment-143151</guid>
		<description>Oh actually GNI is better. Funny thing is that the last quarter GDP of 0.6% was most likely only positive because of rising import prices that weren&#039;t offset by exports. So the trade deficit actually &quot;increases&quot; the GDP in a way through their screwy math.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe it was Q3 2007 where there was like a 20% increase in imported oil so that knocked off something like 0.3% off the GDP deflator and hence made GDP much much greater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh actually GNI is better. Funny thing is that the last quarter GDP of 0.6% was most likely only positive because of rising import prices that weren&#39;t offset by exports. So the trade deficit actually &#8220;increases&#8221; the GDP in a way through their screwy math.</p>
<p>I believe it was Q3 2007 where there was like a 20% increase in imported oil so that knocked off something like 0.3% off the GDP deflator and hence made GDP much much greater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikkel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-143149</link>
		<dc:creator>mikkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/business/corporations/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/#comment-143149</guid>
		<description>Slamfu the actual NBER has a different definition:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;A recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think they do that so they aren&#039;t tied to quarter dating. Also I think that they should move to GDP per capita by that&#039;s just me. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let&#039;s just say that we might not be in a &quot;recession&quot; but that every single indicator of a recession I know of points to one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slamfu the actual NBER has a different definition:</p>
<p>&#8220;A recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think they do that so they aren&#39;t tied to quarter dating. Also I think that they should move to GDP per capita by that&#39;s just me. </p>
<p>Let&#39;s just say that we might not be in a &#8220;recession&#8221; but that every single indicator of a recession I know of points to one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slamfu</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-143145</link>
		<dc:creator>Slamfu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/business/corporations/18781/more-bad-economy-news-employers-cut-most-workers-since-2003/#comment-143145</guid>
		<description>Not that I don&#039;t have my complaints about the economy, the constant downplaying of reality by the Bush administration, or the rampant corruption/incompetence in major institutions that have brought it about, but the term &quot;recession&quot; has a solid definition.  Two consecutive quarters of negative growth.   Has that actually happened?   Recession is not a term that should be thrown about because we feel its happening, but because the numbers back it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I don&#39;t have my complaints about the economy, the constant downplaying of reality by the Bush administration, or the rampant corruption/incompetence in major institutions that have brought it about, but the term &#8220;recession&#8221; has a solid definition.  Two consecutive quarters of negative growth.   Has that actually happened?   Recession is not a term that should be thrown about because we feel its happening, but because the numbers back it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
