An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Guest Voice: Murder in an Alaskan Forest

lynxtrap.jpg

This is a Guest Voice post by journalism professor and author Walter Brasch who is also a syndicated newspaper columnist and radio commentator, and president of the Pennsylvania Press Club. Guest Voice posts do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Moderate Voice or its writers.

Murder in an Alaskan Forest

by Walter Brasch
No one—at least no human—knows his name, or even if he had a name.

We don’t know where or when he was born. We know nothing about his life.

But we know a lot about his death. A politician/trapper from northeast Pennsylvania went to Alaska and killed him. We know this because the local newspaper opened almost a full page to tell us about the glorious hunt.

The story included two pictures. One three-column picture showed Mighty Trapper, smiling and in heavy cold winter clothing, holding the dead lynx by his back legs, his life cut short by at least 10 years. The other picture showed Mighty and his brother, a biologist with Alaska’s Fish and Game Department, each holding a dead lynx. One of the animals appears to be a young female, possibly not even past puberty.

The article tells us that the politician/trapper, who began trapping and killing animals while in elementary school, went to Alaska to “live a lifetime dream of running a trap line in the Alaska interior.” He said he hoped his lines would ensnare not only lynx, but wolves and wolverines as well.

However, traps are indiscriminate devices that not only capture their intended victim, but also other animals as well, including dogs and cats if they’re in the area. He didn’t get wolves or wolverine, and only killed one mink.

“My first thought,” he remembers, “was we should be able to catch dozens every day.” Unfortunately for the trapper, the mink traveled beneath the snow and ice.

The average Canadian lynx (Lynx Canadensis), a close relative to the bobcat, weighs 18 to 30 pounds, has acute sight and hearing, has long legs and large furry feet but can’t run fast except for short distances, and survives primarily on a diet of snowshoe rabbits. Their only major predator is the human.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists the Canadian lynx as “threatened species” in the 48 contiguous states; the Humane Society of the United States is pursuing litigation to change the status to “endangered.” The primary habitat of the lynx is the boreal forests of Montana, Idaho, Washington, Wyoming, with a presence also in New England, Minnesota, Utah, and Colorado. But, Alaska allows unlimited killing during a three to five month season, depending upon region, beginning about Nov. 1 each year, and Mighty Trapper was there to kill lynx. “The state says to capture as many as you can,” he told others after returning to his home.

“Trapping is the greatest sport there is,” this politician told the outdoors reporter, and pointed out, “I’m so very proud to be a part of this real American heritage.”

When not serving as one of three county commissioners, he works every morning for several months a year killing muskrats, raccoons, fox and, reports the newspaper, “other fur bearing animals.” He often jokes around—with individuals and in public meetings—that he’s a member of PETA. Not the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, but People Eating Tasty Animals. It gets a laugh, and lets everyone know what he thinks of animal rights organizations.

As “thrilling” as setting lines and killing lynx may be to some people, it isn’t all that difficult. “Because they’re curious, not as wary of humans, lynx are one of the easier animals to trap,” says Doug Larsen, director of wildlife conservation for the Alaska Fish and Game Department.

A trap line, which may extend several miles, usually consists of dozens of individual traps. The snare wire trap relies upon an animal walking into a wire noose and being strangled by its own forward motion; a steel jaw trap clamps down on an animal’s leg; the conibear trap is a body trap. Mighty Trapper used a few snare traps and a couple of dozen coil spring traps. “Most animals suffer from a few hours to a few days,” says Pierre Grzybowski of the Humane Society of the United States.

The animals often die from hypothermia, strangulation, shock, or from inability to flee predators. Although several trapper codes of ethics suggest that traps be checked regularly, and several states require trappers to check their lines daily, Alaska has no such requirement. Animals that are still alive, even if only barely at the time trappers return, are killed by being choked, clubbed, or shot in the head. The carcasses are often thrown out as trash, the fur usually sent to auction houses.

In the March 2008 auctions, the two largest fur auction houses sold about 5,000 lynx pelts, each for about $300. The pelts of most other animals sold for under $40 each, many for under $10 each. The house takes a 9–11 percent commission.

Although prices were higher this year because of extraordinarily cold weather in northern China and Russia, thus causing fewer animals to be killed, “Only a tiny minority trap full-time and can make money from it,” says Grzybowski. The money most trappers receive from auction “barely covers the cost of gasoline and the cost of traps.” Most trappers, says Grzybowski, “do it solely for the recreation, and nothing else.”

About 40 percent of the 500 bidders at the North American Fur Auctions sale were from China, according to data provided by NAFA, one of the two houses. Most of the other bidders came from Russia, Greece, and Turkey. But, the coats don’t stay in those countries; they are designed, sewn, and shipped into the United States and other countries where the rich can parade their affluence.

The fashion industry is what drives the trapping and sale of fur. Faux fur, synthetic fur, looks almost exactly like real fur, is just as warm as real fur—and is significantly cheaper. One or two lynx pelts are necessary for a coat trimmed in fur. Full-length lynx coats, which might be made from as many as 15 pelts, sell for $7,500–$20,000; a few sell for as much as $50,000. Jackets sell for about $5,000. Although most trappers are men, women are the primary buyers of fur-trimmed and full fur coats.

“It’s a status thing,” says Grzybowski, “they want to wear real fur. They want to show off.”

A Saks Fifth Avenue full-color catalogue in October 2007 told its customers, “This season, fur takes on so many imaginative shapes—Discover it all at the Saks Fur Salon.” One of those shapes at the Salon was an $8,000 woman’s jacket “with brightener-added lynx trim,” available for a sale price of $5,600.

Among other chain stores that sell real fur are Burlington Coat Factory, Dillard’s, Macy’s, Neiman Marcus, Lord & Taylor, and Nordstrom. Lynx hats, jackets, and other clothing items regularly appear on amazon.com, eBay, and dozens of on-line stores. However, more than 100 major designers and chain stores—including Calvin Klein, Guess, Tommy Hilfiger, Ralph Lauren, Lands’ End, J. Crew, Eddie Bauer, American Eagle, and Gap—refuse to work with or distribute real fur.

Mighty Trapper says he plans to return to Alaska in two years when both the rabbit and lynx population are expected to be at a 30 year peak. But, the increased population of the lynx and the possibility that the fashion industry may find other animals to exploit will probably lead to lower prices at the March auctions. It may not matter, anyhow. Mighty didn’t even sell the pelts. He had two of them tanned, and the other one, the one of the largest lynx, sent to his home, eventually to be stuffed and mounted—a trophy of a murder.

As for the newspaper? If Mighty returns to Alaska, it’ll probably run another story and picture of him and an animal he killed. Almost every day during the Christmas season, the newspaper prints several pictures of orange-clad hunters and their deer and black bear. During other times, there’s likely to be pictures of hunters and almost every fur-bearing animal in the region, including bobcats and coyotes, neither of which is edible, neither of which threatens humans.

The editor’s attitude to those readers who complain in this highly religious rural area where boys and girls grow up with guns and legally begin killing animals at the age of 12 is, “If you don’t like it, turn the page.”

Perhaps some day Americans, including the politician/trapper who claims to be religious, will turn the page on violence and actually follow the Sixth Commandment, “You shall not murder.”



Photo at top of post from Internet shows a lynx caught in a painful trap

Cross posted at The Democratic Daily

  • PaulSilver
    I abhor gratuitous killing but appreciate the orderly culling of populations to maintain balance with nature and resources.

    The recent efforts to ban horse slaughter for human consumption seemed humane on the surface but will result in many thousands of horses dying of abuse and starvation because it is no longer cost effective to care for them.

    Careful what you wish for.
  • shaun
    I share Paul's view, but I also abhor journalists who play paddy cake with their readers. Who the fork is the politician, Mr. Brasch, and how about a link to the cited story?
  • daveinboca
    I'd like to know why Gandelman allows a guest blogger who hasn't grown enuf of a pair to name the politico in question. Trapping a lynx or bobcat should be outlawed, but allowing the creep who does it to remain anonymous is cowardly.
  • JSpencer
    Speaking as a gun hunter who likes to put venison on the table each year, I find the trapping of lynx to be abhorrent. In my mind this is a cowardly,and ignorant pursuit, which shows zero, zip, nada respect for the animal, and by extension, nature in general.
  • runasim
    Culling is one thing; killing for food another, and killing for the joy of it another.
    Snaring for the joy of killing is yet another.

    My personal worst sport award goes to hunting in fenced in preserves, where the game is fed off-season so they forget to fear humans.

    But then, I don't even understand the allure of boxing.
  • I thought leg hold trap had been outlawed for years!

    I agree with Paul - hunting and culling of animals in the wild is necessary to maintain the health of the herds and the animals that prey on them. This however is just flat WRONG!

    LL
  • Slamfu
    What Jspencer said.
  • Jim_Satterfield
    Yeah, I have to agree with JSpencer as well. I have no real problem with hunting. But trapping like that? And he calls it a sport? Eeewww.
  • Lynx
    I think it should be clear what I think of "people" (and I use the term loosely) who think their big old macho men for killing animals, armed with traps and high powered weapons. Try to catch and kill a Lynx naked with your bare hands, and if you even HAVE hands at the end of it, you'll be a big old macho man, otherwise you're a schmuck (the only word I can think of that wouldn't violate the comments policy, and then some).
  • brasch
    The lynx has no name -- there is no reason to name the politician or the newspaper. I chose not to give them credibility. The names of both are easily available to even the most dense researcher. The greater issue is the story that focuses upon the killing of animals, the role of the media, and of the fashion fur industry. As to link? I don't know what kind of a link you want. This is original reporting.
    /walt/
  • shaun
    I find your response to be utterly disingenuous and I don't appreciate the
    comment about "the most dense researcher" because I was unable to find a
    link despite a considerable amount of digging. So let's agree to disagree,
    okay?

    Best, Shaun
  • brasch
    Shaun--since you aren't one of my students, I'll give you clues easily found in my article. The trapper is from NE Pa. You can go to my website, listed in the article, and find where I live. You can then search the newspaper in the region where I live. Not too hard. But, the purpose of anonumity for the ytrapper and the newspaper is the same as for the animal--no one knows his name. I saw no reason to identify anyone as long as we treat animals as just so much annoyance and garbage. There was a purpose to all of this. Further, by ID the trapper, it allows otehrs to think it applies to only one person. It doesn't. It can apply to ANY person. Anywhere. Anytime. The decision for this is editoprially and journalistically soujnd--and I've been doing this for 40 years.
    walt

    **************************************
    Walter M. Brasch, Ph.D., professor of Journalism
    Bloomsburg University / Bloomsburg, Pa. 17815
    President, Pennsylvania Press Club
    570-389-4565 / brasch@bloomu.edu
    www.walterbrasch.com <http://www.walterbrasch.com/>

    Latest Books: America's Unpatriotic Acts: The Federal Government's Violation of Constitutional and Civil Rights (2005); 'Unaccepptable': The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina (2006), Sex and the Single Beer Can (2006); Sinking the Ship of State: The Presidency of George W. Bush (2007). All available at Amazon.com and other stores.

    *******************************************

    ________________________________
  • shaun
    Like I said, we'll have to agree to disagree.

    Your chest-puffing view that what you did is sound because you've been doing
    it for 40 years is spoken like a true dinosaur. That is precisely the
    attitude that has gotten the print media in so much trouble. Do you allow
    your students to use computers or are they required to typewrite?

    Best, Shaun
  • brasch
    Oh, get off of it! I don't allow veiled news sources in 98% of the stories--nor do I tolerate it. There ARE times that it is necessary. You can disagree all you want, but it won't change anything. Nor, will I change you. But, don't think that because you read newspapers you know journalism. (And, yes, I once served as a newspaper ombudsman.)
    walt
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC