Comments on: A Big Nail In Hillary’s Coffin? Or Not?

By: Marsh

Marsh — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:03:50 +0000

3rd review down at this Washington Post link. http://tinyurl.com/36hw23

Note the date of the wapo review - 1996

"Zeifman accuses government officials of obstructing the impeachment inquiry. Their reason? Not any sympathy for the besieged Richard Nixon, but a desire to protect the reputation of John Kennedy."

By: Davebo

Davebo — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:06:44 +0000

If all he, a lawyer, has to support his claims is a diary, color me unimpressed.

By: pacatrue

pacatrue — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:19:59 +0000

It's hard to get excited about something she may or may not have done during an aggressive legal battle 35 years ago. But what do I know?

By: Rudi

Rudi — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:04:22 +0000

LOL – Why hasn't Dick Morris heard this before, it would give more ammo to his vendetta against Billary. The hearings were before a committee, let hear from others before we make Dickie Morris happy.

By: shaun

shaun — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:20:04 +0000

Make that Caine and Duvall.

By: shaun

shaun — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:19:31 +0000

For those uncomfortable not with the allegation but the photo, it is a cropped image from a larger photo taken during the Watergate hearings. I actually think she was a bit of a babe back then, but then what do I know.

If it didn't have the photographer's name spread across it, I would have used a much better known image taken at the time that shows young lawyer Hillary flanked by Michael Kane and Robert Duvall.

Here's a link:

http://www.danablankenhorn.com/images/2007/04/0...

By: Idiosyncrat

Idiosyncrat — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:06:24 +0000

Honestly, Shaun, I think the photo you used is bound to cause more damage…

By: GeorgeSorwell

GeorgeSorwell — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:56:45 +0000

A Big Nail In Hillary’s Coffin? Or Not?

Not.

Thanks for asking.