An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Clinton Team Breaking the Bank

It’s not easy to win a presidential primary, nor is it cheap. This is a lesson that Hillary Clinton’s campaign seems to be learning as they go. During a time when you are trying to bolster the troops and keep confidence among your supporters high, leaving a string of unpaid campaign bills and frustrated, angry vendors probably isn’t the best message to send.

Hillary Rodham Clinton’s cash-strapped presidential campaign has been putting off paying hundreds of bills for months — freeing up cash for critical media buys, but also earning the campaign a reputation as something of a deadbeat in some small business circles.

The Clinton campaign is still aggressively raising funds in impressive amounts, so why would they not take care of the caterer after the party?

The New York senator’s presidential campaign ended February with $38 million in the bank, according to a report filed last week with the Federal Election Commission, but only $16 million of that can be spent on her battle with Obama.

The rest can only be spent in the general election, if she makes it that far, and must be returned if she doesn’t. If she had paid off the $8.7 million in unpaid bills she reported as debt and had not loaned her campaign $5 million, the cash she would have had available at the end of last month to spend on television ads and other up-front expenses would have been less than $2 million.

$2 million, while it may be significant to you or me, is not much to wage a primary battle against Barack Obama across multiple states. Senator Clinton will likely burn through more than that in Pennsylvania media buys alone. By contrast, Obama can subtract out the money which must be held for the general election and his comparatively paultry $600K in debts he’s still sitting on a cool $31 million.

Fundraising and management of resources is an important yardstick in a national campaign. Read what you like into the polls, but the old phrase ‘follow the money’ has particular significance here. If your opponent is still firing volleys at you, but you’ve run out of ammo to fire back, the fight begins to turn into a rout. Senator Clinton still insists she is in this for the long haul, but as David Brooks recently put it, this may be a case of The Long Defeat.

  • This is a very realistic and non biased article. Hopefully after Pennsylvania and North Carolina results, this party can focus on November.
  • vwcat
    How a candidate runs their campaign is an important indication of how someone will run the country and how they govern.
    The fact that there is alot of infighting, mismanagement and the on going money problems with Clinton's campaign should make many people nervous. You have to wonder about her management style and ability to run things.
    You look at Obama;s campaign and there is not the drama and infighting. By all accounts it's a close knit operation. And very well run and managed. This should make many feel secure that an Obama presidency would be efficient and smooth running - as much as running the country can be.
  • Another point worth noting is that Obama has raised more from more people in smaller donations than anyone in history. He is the only candidate who can take on the corporate money machine with small donations and not owe the insurance, petroleum, banking interests or the very wealthy any favors or quid pro quo.
  • StockBoySF
    Jazz (and manasia, vwcat and GreenDreams), I agree with everything you all said. I'd also like to add my two cents in this.

    Let me start by saying that I don't know if what I'm about to say is actually true or not, so if anyone has insight to either support or debunk my assertion, I'd love to hear.

    At any rate, one of the things I love about Obama (and I'm primarily using the way he runs his campaign as basis) is that Obama seems to choose the best and brightest people to inform and manage for him.

    Bush (and Hillary) reward loyalty. Whereas there is absolutely nothing wrong with rewarding loyalty, we see what happens when loyalty is rewarded inappropriately. As evidenced by almost the entire Bush administration and by Hillary's campaign mismanagement we can see that the organization doesn't work (and fails) when you reward your supporters by giving them positions they can not handle.

    I'm not saying Obama's campaign won't make mistakes (it has and it will again), and I'm not saying he doesn't have friends in high places- certainly anyone on his campaign (like anyone's campaign) is a loyalist,. But Obama does seem to truly want the best person for the job that he can find. I also think that many people who work for him are somewhat idealistic, which I like, because they want to do good, rather than enrich themselves and their cronies.

    The last thing we want to continue is for the oil companies to continue to make environmental policy (as one example). Many politicians approach politics as a way of accumulating power and once they do so they feel entitled to do what they want for their (and their financial backers') own benefit, and not for the benefit of their constituents.

    It will be interesting to see if power will corrupt Obama in this same way, or if he is one of those rare individuals who can resist the temptation. Given his background, the way he runs his campaign and the fact that he has the courage to speak his mind, even if what he believes isn't popular, I think that he won't let power unduly influence him. I expect to see some mistakes by Obama, but not the sort of systemic concerns and problems in the Bush administration (or Hillary's approach and attitude).
  • lucifer
    At any rate, one of the things I love about Obama (and I'm primarily using the way he runs his campaign as basis) is that Obama seems to choose the best and brightest people to inform and manage for him.

    Yeah, Rev Wright is definately one of the best and brightest!
  • StockBoySF
    Wright may have caused a lot of controversy, and that's been debated. but as I mentioned Obama isn't perfect and Wright has gone from Obama's campaign. It's good to see politicians (and I include Hillary in this praise) admit mistakes and do something about it. If Wright had been in the Bush administration, Bush would still be behind him.
  • MarylandDemocrat
    Dear Minions, You see we have a small problem... Your Majesty really screwed up the Primaries and has lost. To keep things going, Your Majesty has had to use some of her own money. It is obvious now that this thing is over but Your Majesty would like to recoup the millions that has been given to the campaign. Please, won't you give me all your money? I can use your money to completely destroy Obama and support McCain so that a Republican can be elected President and I can destroy the Democratic party not only in 2008 but also in 2012!

    Thanking you,
    Your Majesty, Queen Hillary
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC