An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Hillary Clinton Hugs the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy

So you know how yesterday she just happened to bring up the Obama-Wright controversy seemingly out of nowhere, at a meeting with a Pittsburgh newspaper editorial board and then again at a press conference?

Yeah, well, it gets better.

The newspaper in question is the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, which Josh Marshall correctly describes as “the money-losing, vanity, fringe sheet of Richard Mellon Scaife, funder of the Arkansas Project, the American Spectator during its prime Clinton-hunting years and virtually every right-wing operation of note at one point or another over the last twenty years or more”.

That’s right, Clinton met with the editorial board of a major organ of right-wing propaganda. She even sat next to Scaife himself, one of the engines of the Republican Noise Machine, a man who took it upon himself to spend much of the ’90s trying to destroy the Clintons and who has spent the past several decades trying to destroy liberalism and the Democratic Party.

Now, Clinton claims that she innocently answered a question presented to her. Well, that doesn’t “ring true to me” any more than it does to Josh. This is a right-wing rag we’re talking about, a rag funded by one of the richest and most malicious of the right-wing media barons. Clinton must have known that an Obama-Wright question was coming — and she responded with what seems like a prepared answer: He wouldn’t have been my pastor, I denounced Imus, etc.

Is it any wonder so many think that Clinton will do anything to win? I understand that she needs to win Pennsylvania, and I understand that things are looking bleak, but sitting down with Scaife and engaging in a mutual assault on Obama — she was using him, he was using her, all for the common purpose of tearing down Obama — was simply disgusting.

However typical.

  • Davebo
    I guess Hillary really did kill Vince Foster!
  • Holly_in_Cincinnati
    Would you care to name the politicians who WON'T "do anything" to win?
  • tjproudamerican
    dear Holly

    I know Al Gore would not "do anything" to win. How? He did NOT treat the election of 2000 as if he mattered more than the political health of our nation. Gore had challenges open to him; he came up to the microphone and said George W. Bush is the next president.


    When Gore did this, he KNEW that he had been slighted by the Florida vote and the Supreme Court and the Main Stream Media.

    I stopped being a supporter of The Clinton's in January of this year because I realized that for 16 years I said reflexively, "So?" and "Everybody does it" and "Other people are worse" and so on.

    When you stop excusing The Clinton's, or anybody, there is such freedom.

    But, again, NO! Everybody doesn't run a scorched earth campaign to save themselves. Even Richard Nixon resigned, to his great credit, rather than putting the country through any more turmoil.
  • Slamfu
    All I have to say to that is, WOW. Seriously, she's at a table with Scaife talking shop. What the hell.
  • Mike_P
    And, I'd like to note that the Trib/Scaife thing is one data point among many: Bill Clinton sat in on Rush Limbaugh's show on the day of the TX/OH primaries, after Rush had been urging his listeners to cross over and vote for Hillary to keep the race going - and damaging to the Dems.

    Now the Clinton campaign is circulating an "American Spectator" magazine column to attack an Obama surrogate (Gen. McPeak) as an anti-semite. Of course, American Spectater was the Scaife-funded rag that "broke" such serious and credible stories as Whitewater, Troopergate, and Hillary's murder of Vince Foster. She's been praising McCain, who once joked that Chelsea was so ugly she could be the love child of Hillary and Janet Reno, and Rupert Murdoch is holding fundraisers for her.
  • AustinRoth
    tjproudamerican - sorry, your are referencing the wrong politician. The one you are thinking of is Richard Nixon, not Al Gore.

    I mean, seriously, first he conceded to Bush, then he changed his mind.

    Then he went back to the Florida courts with different rigged count schemes to his favor, which went to SCOTUS.

    They vacated, without dissent, the first Florida Supreme court ruling as violating both the the Federal and Florida constitutions, then the second time, by a 7-2 vote, that the recount as defined by the Florida courts was again unconstitutional (before he gave up the ghost).

    I cannot think of a politician who did more to damage people's faith in the electoral system than Gore.

    The Big Lie is not going to fly on that one.
  • Rudi
    Lets not forget that Clenis appeared on the Rush Limpbaugh show while the former addict had a day off. If Billary wins the Presidency will RL resume his count down(days) of America held hostage by the Clintons?
  • Rudi
    Holly - I don't see Wellstone, Feingold or Jerry Ford rolling in the mud.
  • tjproudamerican
    dear AustinRoth

    Obviously I disagree with you. I am also not telling The Big Lie. My interpretation of the Florida events is that Gore CORRECTLY pursued his assessment and belief that he had gained more votes in Florida, and that a recount would show that he had.

    When the Supreme Court made its decision, Gore gracefully stepped aside. If he still believes that he won, so do many historians and social scientists. Gore is entitled to argue in private life that in Florida in 2000, he actually received more votes, but that thanks to the ballot (how could so many Jewish voters have voted for Pat Buchanon? and recall, the hanging chads) and problems of counting the votes, Bush officially received more votes.

    If you are arguing that this is "A Big Lie" (which you must know implies that I am a fan of Goebbels, when I am a mild mannered soon to be 60 private citizen just trying to understand the world like everyone else), you are mistaken. Gore has never led any movement to say that President Bush was not his president.

    I think Nixon had a similar claim to have actually won Illinois in 1960. Neither Albert Gore nor Richard Nixon is perfect, but at some point in each man's political life, they put our wonderful nation above their own self-interest.

    p.s. only on the internet could someone like me be accused of fostering "The Big Lie." You should be joking when you make those claims, but at least be correct.
  • I just have to say that I am haveing a blast here as a registered conservative Republican watching the fun with a big bowl of popcorn, and a nice cold glass of schadenfreund. Mmmmmm... yummy!
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC