LONG LIVE PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA!

Speaking of Barack Obama:

Barack Obama is a racial-minority individual and does not like racism:

(I) I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention. Many people know what Bush did. And many people will know what Bush did—even until the end of the world. Bush was absolute evil. Bush is now like a fugitive from justice. Bush is a psychological prisoner. Bush often worries. In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

(II) It is opined that Bill Clinton committed terrifying, racist, hate crimes during his presidency, and I am not free to say anything further about it.

(III) What if basically all racial-minority people would subscribe to the interpretations that George Herbert Walker Bush committed monstrous, racist, hate crimes while he was the President of the United States? It will eventually come out: it is only a matter of time.

(IV) I know it may be hard to believe. However, it is absolutely true that Ronald Wilson Reagan committed horrible, racist, hate crimes during his presidency. Numbers 32:23: “Be sure your sins will find you out.”

- A.W.

(I can type 90 words per minute, and there are thousands of copies on the Internet (as of March 29, 2009) indicating the contents of (I), (II), (III), and (IV). And there are thousands of copies in very many countries around the world.)

“BAD NEWS FROM THE UNITED STATES: ON THE HATE CRIMES AND ETERNAL INFAMIES OF GEORGE W. BUSH, BILL CLINTON, GEORGE H.W. BUSH, AND RONALD REAGAN” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG
_______________
‘If only there could be a ban against invention that bottled up memory like scent & it never faded & it never got stale.’ Off the top of my head, it came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.

The antiwar sound like republicans. They must take responsibility for their own actions. They must succeed or we throw them off the welfare rolls.

How odd is the collection of people that make up the antiwar movement. How odd is the Senator from Illinois in his criticism of a war from a purely logical standpoint.

What wars have ever been logical. What battle ever followed a predefined path. Not only are the turks attacking the kurds in the north but the rest of the middle east is waiting to pounce and for the first time the Europeans are starting to see the need to be involved in this area and yet we have a candidate who wants to end the war on day one.

Barak Obama is not a uniter. He is an opportunist. He is taking the war and making it the only thing in which to run a campaign upon. The hatreds by both sides have been the result of the war and he has taken upon himself a candidacy for the POTUS with no experience, little judgment and a single, simple message.

End the war. How sad for the Iraqis if America gives him his dream job.

I would also guess that the promises to keep a strike force in Iraq will be quickly forgotten. Does he really believe that a strike for can be maintained through air support only? What does he think it would do?

His speech reads like an undergraduate thesis written for by a rich white kids at an Ivy league. Too bad he cannot be honest enough to just say that Iraq is not worth the effort and that the U.S. should just leave and that any benefits from a continued presence are less than costs.

I also noticed that the word Kurd is not in the speech. I guess that will quickly be thrown under the bus.

Of course, using the Obama Doctrine there is then no reasons to stay in Afghanistan since country building should not be done and any country that has a Muslim resistance needs to be avoided. I wonder how all of the hip, elite activist on his staff are going to convince Americans that U.S. intervention in Darfur is in the U.S. interest?

hmmm