An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Relationships are funny things…

BlackPanthersPIC1.jpg

THE BLACK PANTHERS

I was born to and raised by former members of the Black Panther Party. I also grew up around my parents’ friends (other former members). Throughout a childhood filled with love and support, the ideas of militant activism rubbed off on me. You could say I was an honorary member of the now-defunct Black Panthers. I fell in love with them. Their struggle. The strength of seeing those black people carry guns in unity. A Black Militia for social activism. But my parents weren’t starry-eyed militants. They were realists. For every romantic notion, I was fed caution. I was told to judge people not by skin color but by actions. I was told to follow the laws of the land and to protest peacefully. Many times they hammered their caution home with looks that would peel the armor off a tank. In the end, they created an independent thinker. A son that volunteers his time to help others. A son that is more optimistic than pessimistic. But they still wax poetic about their Black Panther and militant days. Some of their friends lay the black nationalism on thick over the BBQ. I call these people my friends also. They’ve helped me with homework (thanks Mr. G for your invaluable Calculus lessons), helped me with relationships, and just plain helped me with life. Even though some of things they say are on a par with Minister Louis Farrakhan and Reverend Jeremiah Wright and make me cringe many times.

Reverend Jeremiah Wright… Senator Barack Obama… Relationship. Mentoring. Friendship. All parts of the human experience. Not easily shaken off. Yet this is what running for the President of the United States is about: shaking off “damaged goods” even if you respect, care about, and/or love those “damaged goods”.

The whole Wright-Obama saga (and thanks to my fellow co-bloggers and commenters for their insightful thoughts on this subject) has made me take a look at my associations and friendships. I realize that those friends of mine who have said and continue to say disparaging, inflammatory, and hateful things about people are still my friends. Their impact on my life has been too great. I can’t just drop them. They mean too much to me. They are an integral part of my life, my wife’s life, my children’s life. Even though some of the words out of their mouths embarrass and sometimes repulse me.

Senator Barack Obama has made his choice. His friendship with Rev. Wright means too much to just cut off. He can’t destroy the man that impacted his life so much. Sure Rev. Wright has left his unofficial role with the Obama Campaign, but Senator Obama will not throw him under the bus. Obama must feel that Rev. Wright has not done enough “dirt” (positives outweigh the negatives) to cancel his friendship with him. I admire that since I feel the same way about some of my friends.

Relationships are funny things. We can be impacted by the strangest of characters. One person’s hero may be another person’s villain. Senator Obama’s emotional soft spot has been exposed for all to see. And in the uncaring, unflinching, and harsh world of American politics, a emotional soft spot is easy leverage; manna from heaven.

  • GeorgeSorwell
    I plan to vote for the Democratic nominee, whether it's Obama or Clinton.

    I plan to do that because I've lived through the past eight years, which have featured two incompetently managed wars, tax cuts in a time of war, tax cuts in a time when the largest entitlement program since Medicare was instituted, a ballooning budget deficit, the decline of the strength of the dollar, bailouts for large banks which failed in their due diligence in making loans, recession, the destruction of a large American city, unwillingness to deal with the looming healthcare crisis, incompetence (and likely worse) in the Department of Justice, rising gas prices, an assault on science, and a President satisfied to serve 28% of country.

    Naturally, Republicans are going to do what they can to change the subject. Naturally, they'll be abetted by our dumb news media.

    They've had fifteen years to trash Hilary Clinton and she's still standing. I respect that about her--very, very much. But remember what happened to John Kerry. If the nominee is Barack Obama, they'll use anything (including, apparently, things said by someone other than Barack Obama) to trash him. And they'll be abetted by our so-called news media.

    It's not like Republicans can run on the issues.

    I can't wait to vote!
  • They've had fifteen years to trash Hilary Clinton and she's still standing. I respect that about her--very, very much.

    True enough George. This whole process of "vetting" is heartening and depressing at the same time. Heartening that we give those running for POTUS a thorough poking, prodding, and coroner-like internal investigation. Depressing that we are increasingly hypocritical in that vetting.
  • cbpelto
    TO: T_Steel
    RE: Living With Ones Past

    Thanks for confirming my concerns about Obama and his spiritual mentor of the last 20 years.

    RE: Soft Spots

    "And in the uncaring, unflinching, and harsh world of American politics, a emotional soft spot is easy leverage; manna from heaven." -- T_Steel

    True.

    However, allow me to point out that this is ALL part of the necessary process for us to choose the 'Man' with his finger on a nuclear arsenal.

    Would you have US be any less demanding of that much power?

    Regards,

    Chuck(le)
    P.S. We all have our cross to bear. For me, I could not be promoted to field grade officer in the active Army. Why? Because of the man my sister married....and Iranian expat. God bless them both. But I've learned to live with it. Obama should be prepared to do the same.
  • FuzzyFace
    And those of us who find his relationship with Rev. Wright troubling, have every right to do so. It is rather difficult to believe that someone to whom he is so close, and has considered his spiritual mentor for so long, will have no influence on his ideas and decisions. If the Dems nominate Obama, I'll vote for McCain.
  • Rudi
    TS - At least no one soiled their diapers over your ties to the BP. In Detroit's history, the BP weren't all that violent in comparison to other cities. Kenny Cockrel was more of a threat than the Panthers.
  • cbpelto: "Would you have US be any less demanding of that much power?"

    Nope. I'm somewhat conflicted. On one hand I want us to be critical of those running for POTUS. On the other hand, I want us to look at our lives and the "shady characters" that may have influenced us. But in the end, your point is more valid than mine cbpelto. :)

    And those of us who find his relationship with Rev. Wright troubling, have every right to do so.

    You sure do. And I would be un-American to say otherwise. My point in the post is that you can have a relationship with someone that means so much to you but that same relationship can be used against you. And when found out, BAM! You got a problem.

    I know for a fact that I couldn't run for POTUS. Both of my parents being former Black Panthers? A best friend that served time in prison for gang related activities? Growing up around members of various black nationalist groups? I would be rhetorically flayed alive no matter what I say. *shudder*
  • It occurs to me that, with the advent of the internet, and blogging (and commenting), we're going to rapidly narrow the field of folks who can survive the scrutiny. Lots of folks are on record nowadays with incendiary statements.
  • Rudi
    TS and BO both turned out OK, even with controversial mentors. Many fail even with mainstream mentors(GWB).
    LOL - A Panther mentor for calculus, was this in HS (Cass Tech) or at a local college? I don't picture your mentor helping out in the Pointes.
  • Macan
    This is an excellent post.

    Whether you are against or for Senator Obama...it is difficult to see behind his persona to understand who he is and what is driving him.

    T-Steel's analogy is indicative of how emotionally difficult the Wright issue is for Obama.

    I wonder at how much of the Black Separatist rhetoric Obama has internalized, and whether this accounts for his distancing himself from overt signs of patriotism (altho, on Olberman, the Stars and Stripes were immediately beside him...unusual for Obama, and a sign that Sen Obama's advisors are taking this issue seriously).

    It may not cost him the nomination, but it certainly may the presidency.
  • I told my children to Choose their friends wisely as they will define you.

    I told co bloggers to be careful what they write for one day they will ultimately have to account for what they said.

    This president has failed to take into account the power of the blog. It dismantled his presidency. Barak Obama is the only candidate out there who has used the power of the blog. It might now come back to haunt him.

    Time will tell.
  • Macan
    T-Steel said: "I know for a fact that I couldn't run for POTUS. "

    This is sort of OT...but an important point also.

    I know I could never run for high office, given my past associations. I suspect a lot of people on TMV -- no offense, folks -- could never pass vetting.

    Are all candidates thus totally homogenized? What sort of human beings do we expect to represent us?
  • cbpelto
    TO: T_Steel
    RE: Indeed

    "I'm somewhat conflicted. On one hand I want us to be critical of those running for POTUS. On the other hand, I want us to look at our lives and the "shady characters" that may have influenced us." -- T_Steel

    And it's not so much 'navel gazing' as some people would like to suggest. We all have our demons to be exorcised. The problem is 'target recognition' and when to realize that you've 'hit the target'.

    It took me some time to get over what happened to me. But, looking back on it from where I am now, I'm the better for it. Sure I had to change careers, but in the end it all worked out for the better....or so I think. After all, if it hadn't worked out this way, I wouldn't be married to this wonderful woman who reminds me of the one described in the latter part of Proverbs 31.

    Regards,

    Chuck(le)
    [Keep'n the Faith.....]
  • kritt11
    If you vet candidates by those who a) have any present or past association with shady characters, b) have any sign of character flaws (like Spitzer or Bill Clinton) or c) are judged to be too divisive in their past actions (Hillary) ---don't you end up with the most mediocre candidate possible?

    Seems to me, after that process you might get someone who outwardly seems morally upright, has the right connections and pedigree, yet can't function in a leadership position- more of an empty figurehead------like George W Bush!
  • cbpelto
    TO: Whocares
    RE: Always!

    "I told co bloggers to be careful what they write for one day they will ultimately have to account for what they said." -- Whocares

    That's why I use my real name. It keeps me (1) honest and (2) mindful of others...to a degree.

    Regards,

    Chuck(le)
    [Ride hard. Shoot straight. And always tell the Truth. -- Cyrus the Great]]
  • Jim_Satterfield
    And what about McCain's relationship with Hagee, FuzzyFace? Shouldn't that be at least as troubling as Obama's relationship with Wright?
  • cbpelto
    TO: kritt11
    RE: I Don't Think So

    "....don't you end up with the most mediocre candidate possible?" -- kritt11

    Rather, I think we weed out the less-qualified.

    If we'd know of Mr. Bill's character flaws instead of listening to Al Gores hype, "We don't need 'values'. Our family HAS 'values'." [Note: Yeah....some kinda values....those.], we wouldn't have had to deal with 8 years of a presidency that discredited the office.

    The REAL challenge, after all this time, is to find and recruit qualified individuals to RUN for political office.

    Yeah.....they need to be a LOT cleaner than most of US, but there it is. We NEED such people. Without them, we'll just slide into the proverbial hole that all great nations fall into if they do not exercise due diligence.....the pit of oblivion. And I lay the blame for our current situation on the vaunted American public education system for failing to teach our children well.

    Hope that helps....

    Regards,

    Chuck(le)
    [Education, n., Replacing an empty mind with an open one.]

    P.S. As a judge of my state's high school debate tournaments, I am continually affronted by the lack of historical knowledge and critical thinking I see displayed in such events. Some of the kids are brilliant, but all too many of them are clueless about reality. I attribute it to poor education in history.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    I wonder if anyone wants to defend the performance of George W Bush? Or the performance of Republicans in power?

    I wonder if anyone has any qualms about the character of John McCain?
  • I'm a conservative Republican who has only voted for two democrats ever--Jimmy Carter and Eliot Spitzer--both of which I regretted. Still, I think Obama is OK here, unless we see video of him cheering while Wright espouses hate, bigotry and idiocy.

    We all have friends and relatives who say outrageous things from time to time. I won't throw any of my friends under the bus and I don't expect Obama or any other politician to do so, either. If they aren't on your staff, then just tell me you don't agree with their position or statements and show me that you don't agree by your actions, and as far as I'm concerned the issue is over.

    If I disassociated myself from every friend and relative who is a bit crazy, I'd be a lonely, lonely, man.
  • cbpelto
    TO: GeorgeSorwell
    RE: Sure Think....

    "I wonder if anyone wants to defend the performance of George W Bush? Or the performance of Republicans in power? " -- GeorgeSorwell

    ....but it is non sequitur to this thread. Perhaps if you got someone to start it on some SPECIFIC topic.

    Regards,

    Chuck(le)
    [When in a bad position, try to change the subject.]
  • cbpelto
    TO: aredmindinabluestate
    RE: Disassociations

    "If I disassociated myself from every friend and relative who is a bit crazy, I'd be a lonely, lonely, man." -- aredmindinabluestate

    I don't think we're called upon to disassociate ourselves from true friends and real relations. Rather, we're obliged to help them.

    We're obliged, by blood, to help our relations.

    The challenge is in choosing our friends wisely.

    Regards,

    Chuck(le)
    [I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend. -- Thomas Jefferson]

    P.S. The good [Democrat] president was VERY careful in choosing his friends. We should emulate that.
  • cbpelto
    TO: Jim_Satterfield
    RE: Hagee, Anyone?

    "And what about McCain's relationship with Hagee...." -- Jim_Satterfield

    Based on your link to a Salon hit-piece on Hagee, I think a discussion of his positions would be (1) interesting, (2) educational and (3) fun.

    Maybe you could get one of the co-authors here to instigate it. But, in this thread, I think it is non sequitur.

    Regards,

    Chuck(le)
    P.S. What can you say about someone whose only defense against six rounds at close range fired by a maniac with a revolver while standing in the pulpit was a Bible held out by the minister.....and every fired round missed.....

    [Coincidence, n., When God works a miracle and doesn't get the credit.]
  • mikkel
    Yeah George, some people have some very serious qualms about McCain.

    Anyway, it is one thing to judge people on their personality flaws. I will always consider Clinton to be the most disappointing president I think, just because he had everything going right for him and let it slip away.

    But maybe I'm weird, I actually want people that have "questionable" associations from the past -- maybe even questionable actions -- as long as it is clear that they have learned from those experiences. If every one were picture perfect, there wouldn't really be a need for government at all. But most of the problems in the country are easily reflected in the radical, the criminal, the hypocrite. I don't see how people can very well expect to make things better, unless they understand and respect the mindsets of the people that either actively make things worse, or at least are just caught up in the worst aspects...especially if they then use that information to try and figure out how to make things better and confront their "questionable" friends with the new way forward.

    I've learned more to appreciate who I am, and understood the mindset of a lot of the downtrodden through unsavory characters (especially the extremely intelligent ones because it makes me question why I am like I am and they are different) than any one else. I think that what Wright said reflects the underlying fears and thoughts of a large number of people (and not just about Black/White relations. If you just substituted poor and rich every time he mentioned race then a ton of people would agree.) and I've found that the people I've talked to that are criminals have the same rationale and downtrodden outlook as the people that I know that just meandering through life and not meeting their potential in the now stereotypical suburban blight way...the consumerist way that has now gotten our country into deep economical trouble.
  • I love your post, T-Steel. I think you write what a lot of us feel and some of us have been trying to say though maybe in not nearly as eloquent a way or in a way that can reach as many people. I've written about it as being this discovering of whether or not one has come to diverge so much that you can no longer embrace something or someone. You add that we can have that divergence and still, acceptably, continue to have a relationship.

    But, we must know all that, because when, as you say, you get to the political sphere, beware how others are going to judge it. I don't know what more we can do, except try to be consistent and sincere.
  • kritt11
    cbpelto- I could not disagree more. If we weed out all of the leaders with character flaws, we would have weeded out---Thomas Jefferson (longterm affair with slave), Ben Franklin (notorious womanizer), Martin Luther King (cheated on his wife), FDR (likewise unfaithful to Eleanor), JFK (serial womanizer), RFK (ditto), LBJ (ditto), Newt Gingrich (who might have deserved to be weeded out!) The list goes on and on.

    I really don't care if someone has an affair as long as they can compartmentalize and still run the country effectively. Yes, Clinton was/is a womanizer, but he also had substantial achievements in office. We now have a faithful husband in office who claims to be morally upright. Yet, he has mismanaged and abused the powers of the presidency, and recklessly disregarded the checks and balances that keep our system healthy.
  • Macan
    kritt11 said: "Yet, he has mismanaged and abused the powers of the presidency, and recklessly disregarded the checks and balances that keep our system healthy."

    I would point out that FDR - of sainted memory - was the president who attempted the most reckless overturning of the "checks and balances" of the American system in history when he attempted to expand the Supreme Court with extra justices after 1936 when the Supreme Court struck down some of his initiatives.

    FDR also loved reading wiretaps on his political opponents.

    Had Bush attempted anything like the sainted FDR he would be damned by the Left as a power-crazed dictator unprecedented in history.

    Of course, knowing their history well, no one on the Left would ever say such a thing. :)
  • cbpelto
    TO: kritt11
    RE: Reading/Comprehension Issues?

    "If we weed out all of the leaders with character flaws...." -- kritt11

    Where did i say anyone with a character flaw is ineligible?

    We all have 'flaws'. Some of them are more egregious than others.

    Our—the electorate—task is to determine which flaws are less egregious.

    The problem is that it seems that only those with REALLY egregious flaws want to become elected officials.

    There is something of a difference. Don't you think?

    Regards,

    Chuck(le)
    [Government has come to be a trade, and is managed solely on commercial principles. A man plunges into politics to make his fortune, and only cares that the world should last his days. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson]
  • FuzzyFace: "It is rather difficult to believe that someone to whom he is so close, and has considered his spiritual mentor for so long, will have no influence on his ideas and decisions."

    Obama has indicated very clearly that Wright has had a tremendous influence on his life with respect to his teachings on how the Christian life should be lived. He has also been very clear that he does not agree with Wright's more inflammatory statements, and Obama's words and deeds seem to show that to be true.

    As TSteel and others in this thread have indicated, all of us associate with people who hold views that wouldn't be popular if posted on youtube. That's life. But another part of life is being able to recognize goodness in people, and to focus on the positive aspects of their personality. Since this discussion is occurring due to the words of a preacher, look at the clearest example from the Bible - Jesus kept company with tax collectors and other less-than-perfect individuals; youtube would not make his life easy were he here today. Maybe Obama secretly holds all of Wright's most controversial beliefs and merely hides that fact so well that his CORE MESSAGE is quite the opposite; however, it seems more likely that he found inspiration in his pastor while disagreeing with some of the things he said.
  • cbpelto
    TO: All
    RE: Hey!

    Can we please get back ON-TOPIC?

    Regards,

    Chuck(le)
    [The field behind rhetoric is oft mined with equivocation.]
  • domajot
    T-Steel,

    Your post earned a perfect 10 in my book.
  • JSpencer
    Great post T-Steel. The general inclination of people to categorize and file information according to crisp, concise guidelines tends to ignore many important aspects of the human element, which of course is why we have brains and can use them to think! People here have already echoed some of my own thoughts, so suffice to say, your point is a valid and necessary one, especially for anyone who is quick to buy into a (shallow) judgement of Obama based on all this Wright business. I know several people who would never pass the "vetting test", but who are capable, decent, and utterly trustworthy.
  • kritt11
    cbpelto--- I guess for me- I look to see if the pol's achievements outweigh their flaws. We can't expect perfection, and many who are drawn to politics are ego-centric narcissists. They adore the attention and praise that power brings, not to mention connections and perks. I'd rather have a womanizer in office than an incompetent.
  • domajot
    All this talk of character flaws and demons needing to be exorcised is leading to a theater of the absurd, where plain old common sense is not given even a walk-on role. No living, breathing human being lives in a world where good and bad are so clearly departmentalized, unless 'bad' is simply and simplistically anything that fails to fit in nicely with one's own judgement.

    Since Jesus is not a candidate, whoeve is elected is going to be a mortal human being with his/her share of human flaws. In fact, if Jesus were a candidate, his opponent would probably tear him to shreds for consorting with a prostitute. Compassion for and understanding of the 'wrong' person is apperently now a character flaw.

    Scrutiniy is a must, but scrutiny born of pre-judgment and judgment without an appreciation of context is little more than a witch hunt.

    Then, too, there are flaws and flaws.
    Sexual indiscretions are not on a par with plotting to overthrow the government.

    Judging character and its flaws led to Pete Seeger being blacklisted for 17 years, lest the public be exposed to the subversive act of singing folk songs. 'Goodnight, Irene": was that a call to take up arms agaisnt the government?

    Common sense calls for keeping a rational perspective and avoiding extreme, across the board judgments..
  • pacatrue
    T-Steel said in a comment, "I know for a fact that I couldn't run for POTUS. Both of my parents being former Black Panthers? A best friend that served time in prison for gang related activities? Growing up around members of various black nationalist groups? I would be rhetorically flayed alive no matter what I say."

    I unfortunately feel he might be right. If so, it's awfully sad. Obviously, I don't know t-steel, but if he were to spend the next 20 years doing all sorts of amazing things but still couldn't be elected to a major office due to his former friends.... That's bad for our nation.

    To the Obama/Wright issue, Elrod hinted at this in an earlier post, but there are two separate matters on hand. The first is whether Obama believes / "has internalized" any of these ideas. Obama does have a 15 year or so track record to see if any such beliefs have ever come out. I have seen no evidence that this is the case. People are welcome to present this evidence

    The second matter is simply participating in a church in which such beliefs were propogated, and by doing so, supporting it. This is where Obama could take a hit and where T-Steel's post is so relevant. How bad is attending a church in which the preacher sometimes says repugnant things? I can't answer this question for others. One fact finding mission that would be of some use is to simply talk to the several thousand other members of the church. Why do they attend? What do they like and not like about the church? If everyone comes out saying "I love the spiritual guidance in the life of Christ, the social support the church provides, and the donuts before Sunday School," then we can guess this is why Obama was there as well. If everyone attends because of the political awakening going on, then people can justifiably worry more.
  • kritt11
    Doma's argument makes my point beautifully. I'd rather have the flawed candidate who can compartmentalize (as Clinton did) and run the government competently than the sanitized incompetent we have in office now.
  • elrod
    Great post T-Steel, as always.

    Pacatrue,
    Thanks for the hat/tip. I've been thinking this over the last few days and I feel increasingly that Obama's relationship with Wright is not troubling at all. I say this because I've researched Wright and TUCC more and I've come to the conclusion that the church is the home of THE black establishment in Chicago and not some radical nutjob haven. Should we question Michael Jordan, Oprah Winfrey and Tiger Woods' judgment for going to this church and, presumably, listening to this man? I bet Jordan met closely with Wright when Jordan's father was murdered. Is Jordan now some bigot - or at least a man with terrible judgment - because of this?

    Also, the UCC is a mostly white denomination, but TUCC is THE flagship church. Rev. Wright has helped mostly white congregations get off their feet throughout the country, including especially in the Midwest. Wright is not defined solely by those sermons on display. And Obama shouldn't be defined by association with a pastor who gives them.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    The notion of someone insisting repeatedly that we stay on topic makes me want to ...wait for it...chuckle!!
  • EEllis
    T-Steel this was a great post and I think you might be surprised at what people can except in others past. I do think how you speak of your situation is different from the feel I get from the OB campain. If he were to speak and explain himself with the same eloquence then it would be much less of an issue for me. Acting like it shouldn't be a problem, that it is just a smear..............well that's a different thing.
  • If he were to speak and explain himself with the same eloquence then it would be much less of an issue for me.

    My father said pretty much the exact same thing when he read my post. He said Senator Obama went "too political" and should just be "real" with everyone on this issue. Very interesting.

    I 'm SO upset that I wasn't able to participate more in this discussion yesterday (was extremely busy). Their has been so many great comments that you all deserve a round of applause!
  • FuzzyFace
    It's not simply knowing Wright that is the issue. It's that Obama has viewed him as his spiritual advisor for pretty much his entire adult life. Wright married the Obamas, baptized their children, and the Obamas have attended his church regularly. That's not true for the McCain-Hagee relationship or any of the other parallels people have suggested. When Obama went to law school, he apparently took lectures on tape by Wright with him as inspiration. That's an enormous influence.
  • pacatrue
    Indeed, it is a big influence, fuzzyface. Have you seen any evidence in Obama yet that he thinks God should damn America?
  • FuzzyFace
    I don't know. I don't feel like taking the chance. This is hardly his only troublesome association, although it is among the worst. I'm not crazy about people like Zbigniew Brzezinski getting back into power, either. Obama now is on my 'to vote against' list. I expect to be part of a strong majority of Pennsylvania primary voters who push Hillary back up.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC