An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Notes From a Black Pastor

Well, considering that I am an African American pastor, I should say something about the whole affair concerning the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ, Barack Obama’s church.

I have to state, in the interest of full disclosure, that I am an ordained pastor in the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) and also have standing in the United Church of Christ, the denomination that Rev. Wright and Trinity belong to.

Now, that I’ve got that out of the way, when some of the early rumors were swirling about the church, I tended to think this was nothing more than falsehoods. I thought that a church that was trying to “uplift the race” was probably a good thing and even though I don’t agree with Sen. Obama’s views, I did affirm his spiritual roots at a church that was focused on social justice and helping the least of these.

Now that I have seen and read the sermons Rev. Wright has preached, my views have changed a bit.

Most African American preachers will inject social concerns into their sermons. Because of our experience with slavery and later segregation, we tend to see Christianity in a more prophetic role, where God is on the side of the downtrodden. While I mostly preach in predominately white churches (and I tend to have a more subdued style than most black preachers) I do tend to talk about care for the poor and about the fact that God loves and accepts all regardless of color or sexual orientation. I believe that as Christians we are called to strive for justice and I do try to make that point in my sermons.

That said, the sermons by Rev. Wright go waaaay over the top. He paints an America that I don’t recognize and throws in falsehoods and a tinge of anti-Semitism that I believe shames all African American preachers.

There is no way you can explain away Wright’s belief that 9/11 was basically “just desserts” on America, especially a few days after the event. Then there is his giving into dark conspiracy theories such as the one where the government gives black people the drugs. Or, his talk of Zionism as white racism.

There is just something wrong about what Rev. Wright is doing. It’s not that he isn’t patriotic enough as some on the right are yelping: it’s that this man seems an inverse of the late Jerry Falwell: a mean-spirited preacher that uses the Bible to further his agenda.

How will this affect Sen. Obama? I don’t know. This will probably blow over like so many other stories about slip-ups by surrogates. But then again this might have legs. As some have argued, this is not like John Hagee mouthing off his anti-Arab rants after having endorsed John McCain. McCain doesn’t go to his church. (McCain should have denounced those remarks nevertheless.) Obama and his family have been part of Trinity for 20 years. As Shay over at Booker Rising notes: “If you’ve been going to a pastor’s church for 20 years and he married you and baptized your children, you agree with most of what that pastor says.”

I don’t know if Obama agrees with what his pastor says, but it is going to look that way because of his long ties with Rev. Wright.

As Ross Douthat explains, Obama is going to have to do more than say this is just his “crazy uncle.” He notes:

So far, Obama has attempted to laugh off Wright’s penchant for inflammatory rhetoric, comparing him to “an old uncle who says things I don’t always agree with,” and suggesting that this is “what happens when you just cherry-pick statements from a guy who had a 40-year career as a pastor.” But as Wright’s America-bashing gets more airtime — and as his Obama-boosting sermons put his church’s tax exemption at risk — Obama may have to go further down the road to explicitly disavowing his pastor. His connection to Wright isn’t the equivalent of John McCain’s going to Liberty University to make nice with Jerry Falwell. It’s the equivalent of John McCain taking his wife and children, most Sundays, to Jerry Falwell’s church. And the disconnect between Obama’s studied moderation and his congregation’s radicalism requires more of an explanation than he’s offered so far.

Obama’s rhetoric has been one of unity and hope. I take him at his word. But he will have to come to terms with his pastor’s extreme views because, if he doesn’t, we can expect the GOP to use Rev. Wright’s sermon in commercials this fall.

Update: The United Church of Christ, Rev. Wright’s and Sen. Obama’s denomination has responded to the story, supporting the congregation. In the past, I would have agreed this was a smear, but no longer.

Update, Part Deux: Sen. Obama released a statement on Rev. Wright’s comments. Hopefully, his handling of this situation along with Rev. Wright leaving the campaign, will allow this to blow over. Good for the Senator.

  • elrod
    Dennis,
    Obama forcefully denounced Wright this afternoon. What are your thoughts on it? The denunciation, in full is here:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barack-obama/on-m...

    He's going on TV to talk about tonight - including on Sean Hannity's show.
  • What type of church is this?

    Barak Obama supported this church and its teachings for years and years by his continued presence and work for this church and its congregation.

    That should say it all.
  • Macan
    Obama has been attending this church, and has known this pastor, for over twenty years...and only NOW is he aware of Wright's history of anti-Semitic, anti-American rhetoric?

    Much like Obama had been Tony Rezko's friend for years, and took his money, even bought real estate with him...without ever picking up a newspaper to read of Rezko's shady dealings (that the Chicago press have covered for years)...and only NOW is he aware of these troublesome stories.

    Poor Senator Obama...how many more times in the campaign will he be profess to be "Shocked, Shocked" by what was going on all around him for years?
  • Macan
    Dennis, thank you for the link to Booker Rising. I thought the comment in response to Shay was interesting:

    "My problem with the "God damn America" mentality is not just that it is anti-American; it is profoundly un-Christian. Even if Senator Obama chose to ignore the politics of Rev. Wright's sermons (or if, as the Senator seems be claiming, he did not see them as particularly political to begin with), the spiritual poison from Trinity United's leader should have been self-evident (as it was to your Grandma), and reason enough to find another church at which to worship."
  • GeorgeSorwell
    Of course this will be all over the Republican TV commercials.

    Republicans can't run on how well they've managed the war.

    Republicans can't run on how well they've managed the economy.

    Republicans can't run on how well they've managed health care.

    So they'll attack what his Christian minister said. Even as they're running a whispering campaign that he's a secret Muslim.

    And there will always be apologists for this.
  • duog
    I'm a retired caucasian Canadian. I truly seems to me that the USA can't let a new and inspiring younger leader play the game unless he survives a multimedia whipping.
    Barack Obama has already improved the reputation of the USA abroad. We're all watching to see if America has matured into the nation the founding fathers dreamed about (minus the brutal slavery of course).
  • domajot
    Whocares adked:
    "What kind of achurch is this?"

    The obsession with churches and religions really has to stop someitme. We're still recovering from the uproar about Mormonism. In the end, what did it have to do with Romney, the presidential candidate? Inspite of the extreme secrecy of the Mormons about their ceremonies and practices, we cama to accept Romney at this word, and no one was damaged as a result.

    In Obama's case, his church is more open, so we know about Rev. Wright and we know what Obama's contrasting beliefs are, so there is much less guesswork involved. We're actually ahead of the game, when compared to other leaders.

    This has got to stop, or we'll end up obsessing about every public figure's religion. .
    What about the revered Rev. Billy Graham's influential relationship with many of our Presidents? He was a self-acknowledged anti-semite for most of his life.
    How does that change the legacy of Pres. Bush?

    Do we really need to re-examine the vaious religious beliefs of the Founding Fathers? They were far from inified in the area of religion but still managed to produce the Constitution. together.


    This just has to stop if we are to retain a modicum of logic in the process of choosing Preidential candidates and, eventually, Presidents.
  • domajot
    Macan cited to these word:s "My problem with the "God damn America" mentality is not just that it is anti-American; it is profoundly un-Christian."

    Please, let's not resort to using those old political clubs again.. They are being worn out to the point of being useless, if not always as laughabel as many find them.

    As Obama has stated, and I agree with him, Rev. Wright has been extreme in his statements. Like Dennis said, he has gone way over the top.

    What being anti-American or anti-Christian precisely means, however, is not clear in the least. the number of definitions are myriad.
    Too many use these kind of characterizations about anyone who disagrees with them either about politics or theology. This practice dimishes both the inherent value of patriotism and Christianity. When used as political tools, It cheapens both condepts.
  • stephen1947
    Everyone who's denouncing Rev. Wright based on this compilation of clips assumes that this is all that he's been saying for the past 20 years - some are quick to leap to assumption because this confirms in some way what they want to believe, others because they live in a climate of constant fear and don't know any better. Whatever. But to build an argument based on assumptions you haven't actually done anything to verify shows me that I don't really have to pay as much attention to what you say as I would to someone who was actually demonstrating thoughtfulness.
  • Idiosyncrat
    domajot: "The obsession with churches and religions really has to stop someitme. We're still recovering from the uproar about Mormonism. In the end, what did it have to do with Romney, the presidential candidate?"

    Lots. Same goes with Obama. The ideologies you cling to, the people you actively choose to associate with, the advisors and mentors you choose, the organizations you are active in... These are also important reflections on who a person is and the kinds of choices he or she makes.

    Whether it takes the form of a religious or something else is of little concern to me. A deal breaker? Not necessarily. But it's just another data point to consider... And in this case, it's not a particularly flattering one.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    The return of Mormon-bashing!
  • domajot
    Idio,

    While religion and other associations might be good to know, our obsession with the trivia of a candidate's life, obscures what we really need to know: what is this person's character and what are his qualifications. It's taking superficial indicators and raising them to the level of iffefutable evidence of this or that, and everyone filles in thir own blanks as to what the evidence acutally proves.

    What does church attendance mean anyway? It means that someone sat in a church for X number of hours. Whether a person actually listened to the sermons or slept through them or took away a twisted message tfrom them all that might be actually important still remains unknown The trivial pursuit game distracts from what's ireally mportant and opens the door to endless apeculation, insinuation, and political arguments about nothing.of substance.

    I
  • Creole
    domajot,

    I'm afraid your analysis does not apply in this instance (where it often does, e.g., in white, often secular, churches). This is not "trivia" about Obama, nor are the indicators "superficial." Your comments indicate to me that you are not familiar with churches like the TUCC or pastors like Rev Wright. I am, they are prevalent where I lived for most of my life.

    The TUCC espouses a "black values system" that is based on 70's far-left black nationalism. It is called Black Liberation Theology. It is a fusion of religion with politics, the former driving the latter. The two are inseparable and inter-twined. The mission is one of activist social change; the message is one of virulent racism, anti-white (and anti-middle class black), anti-Americanism, conspiracy theory, paranoia, and the politics of grievance and victimization. One only need become a bit familiar with a Rev Wright or devotees to see how much this drives their behavior, politics, and world view.

    Obama is very closely associated with this value and belief system. While I believe him when he says that he doesn't agree with Wright's most extreme and noxious views, it is to be expected that the theology does influence his politics, and in fact, Obama acknowledges that. I doubt that you would be as dismissive of a candidate who is as active as Obama is in TUCC and has as close a religious and political association to Wright as Obama does, if that candidate were the same but with a Pat Robertson or a Jerry Falwell. And you would be right. I think if you take a close look at Obama's political philosophy and positions, you will find elements of his church's religious social activism to be drivers.

    You rightly comment on the importance of a person's character. Knowing what I do about Wright and his ilk (like Farrakhan), I find it very difficult to reconcile Obama's character as presented, with Wright's. And again, this is not a passing or casual relationship. Nor one where politics is separate from religion. And Obama is not twiddling hours away in the pew. He is energetically active, he generously contributes financially, he seeks Wright's counsel before making important political decisions. And by the way, in his book he makes reference to some of Wright's incendiary sermons as having been influential to him.

    What goes further to your character point is that Obama has attempted, dishonestly and disingenuously, to persuade voters that there is nothing controversial about his church or Rev Wright. One only need to back-track over his answers to questions in this vein, and especially look at the language used, to see this.

    I honestly regret the above were not the case. I voted for Obama in the primary - shame on me for not doing my homework. I'll not repeat that mistake.
  • domajot
    Creole,
    As I see it, your reaction exemplifies exactly why we make a serious error when we judge a person by the church he atttends.

    The church in question does not represent a unified social/cultural position.
    It's a community spanning generations. Wright does, indeed, represent the angry generation, who replaced the uncle Tom generation, who replaced slaves.

    To undersant the church, we need to understand the basics of how the black community has evolved and is evolving still.

    Obama is of the newest genration, who embrace ideas suitable to today's world.
    They have the liuxury of not needing to be angry anymore in order to succeed and achieve progress for the community.

    Let me ask you this: Should the descendants of slave owners be required to disown theri forbears because they, in today's world,, find slavery offensive?
    Should we condemsn Lincoln because he didn't put an end to salvery forcefully enough or too forcefully.

    That's the kind of, out of contxet, judgment you are making about Obama's membership in a church that has a long hsitory and a multi-genrational membership/ I watched a service in Obama's church on C-Span. There was a rather boring sermon, and it ended with everyone singing the 'black and while together' verse to We Shall Overcome. How radical or controversial is that?

    All churches are evolving. The Episcopalians are fighting over the women as priests issue. Evangelicals are truning their attention to the environment. As far as I know, few are not throwing ou the protraits of past leaders with whom they have tcome o disagree. They just evolve with the times and define their own relationship to their church.

    Why on earth are the requirements different for Obama?
    What we need to know is what Obama believes, not what every black preacher of past generations has ever preached, in this church or in any church.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC