An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Pondering Political Labels

David Mamet writes in the Village Voice Why I Am No Longer a ‘Brain-Dead Liberal’ This remarkable author of soul searching plays about the choices we make when we are under stress reflects on his political beliefs. As a life long liberal he begins to reconcile his experiences with his beliefs and finds a weakness.
While the title makes it sound like he switches from liberal to conservative I think it is more accurate that he switches from liberal to independent with a new open mind that all government intervention is not effective and all market forces are not efficient.


A few nuggets:

The Constitution, written by men with some experience of actual government, assumes that the chief executive will work to be king, the Parliament will scheme to sell off the silverware, and the judiciary will consider itself Olympian and do everything it can to much improve (destroy) the work of the other two branches. So the Constitution pits them against each other, in the attempt not to achieve stasis, but rather to allow for the constant corrections necessary to prevent one branch from getting too much power for too long.

and

I found not only that I didn’t trust the current government (that, to me, was no surprise), but that an impartial review revealed that the faults of this president—whom I, a good liberal, considered a monster—were little different from those of a president whom I revered.

Bush got us into Iraq, JFK into Vietnam. Bush stole the election in Florida; Kennedy stole his in Chicago. Bush outed a CIA agent; Kennedy left hundreds of them to die in the surf at the Bay of Pigs. Bush lied about his military service; Kennedy accepted a Pulitzer Prize for a book written by Ted Sorenson. Bush was in bed with the Saudis, Kennedy with the Mafia. Oh.

and

… White knew that people need both to get ahead and to get along, and that they’re always working at one or the other, and that government should most probably stay out of the way and let them get on with it. But, he added, there is such a thing as liberalism, and it may be reduced to these saddest of words: ” . . . and yet . . . ”

The right is mooing about faith, the left is mooing about change, and many are incensed about the fools on the other side—but, at the end of the day, they are the same folks we meet at the water cooler. Happy election season.

  • cosmoetica
    He was ok till here:

    I began reading not only the economics of Thomas Sowell (our greatest contemporary philosopher)

    That's a guffaw-inducer.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    he switches from liberal to independent with a new open mind that all government intervention is not effective and all market forces are not efficient


    That's pretty much where I am, too, though I didn't get there from the same starting point as Mamet.
  • domajot
    If it were up to me, I would put the OPEN MIND bit in capital letters and add a clause about balance.

    I think most iself-labeling, as well as major political movements develops as a reaction to some injustice, need or shortcoming in the status quo. Unfortuantely, the new direction then goes too far, and , as a result, we veer once more in the opposite direction. Back and forth we go, alwayss fogetting to guard against going too far, going to extremes.

    I don't think it mattesr so much whether one wears the Independent political label.
    IMO, it''s more important to maintain an independen and open mind.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC