An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Obama’s Move to Disarm Clinton

If he wants to end it sooner than later, Barack Obama should announce now that he intends to ask Hillary Clinton to share the Democratic ticket with him.

Clinton herself opened the door for such an invitation yesterday. Asked about the possibility on CBS’ “Early Show,” she answered “that may be where this is headed, but of course we have to decide who is on the top of the ticket.”

That decision has already been made by the voters and, in the coming days, will be ratified by the defection of superdelegates. With her “35 years of experience,” Hillary Clinton is a seasoned enough politician to know that.

For his part, Obama has been reaching out far enough to indicate that he might ask Republicans like Chuck Hagel and Dick Lugar to serve in his cabinet as Secretaries of Defense and State. Making a move toward Clinton would not be that much of a stretch for a candidate whose theme has been uniting the country.

He can start with the Democratic Party. A declaration that he wants Hillary Clinton to run with him need not be coupled with the demand for an immediate answer, but it would relieve Obama of any pressure to go negative against Clinton and help disarm her recent tendency to tear him down.

In 2000, George W. Bush claimed he was a uniter. This year, Obama can prove that he is one and go a long way toward the White House by doing it.

Cross-posted from my blog.

  • Amanda
    It makes perfect logical sense, but I don't think it'll work because voters are not always (or often) logical in their choices. For one thing, many of Obama's supporters dislike Hillary Clinton and might feel that her presence on the ticket taints their candidate. Having her in the VP slot could drive away a big chunk of the moderate and independent voters who might be happier voting for McCain than putting a Clinton in the White House again. Plus, a lot of people who voted for Clinton in the primaries are the core of the Democratic party and whoever has the big "D" next to their name on the ballot this November is who they vote for, so Obama doesn't need Clinton to hold onto those votes.

    And when you consider that the next President is going to face some very serious international policy issues, it would behoove Obama to consider someone like Wes Clark or Bill Richardson as a running mate. They both have solid records of public service, Clark as a soldier and a Richardson as a diplomate, that would provide a good balance to Obama's comparative inexperience in foreign affairs. Basically, Barack doesn't need Hillary to unite the party and win in November. As long as he picks a solid running mate (and he should start floating out names now), he'll have the support of the party and the voters.
  • G_Hendricks
    I don't see it happening. I'm betting on Dodd, or maybe even Chuck Hagel (heh, heh).
  • PaulSilver
    I agree that some bold ideas like that would force all the candidates to race towards the middle.
  • jac66
    I disagree, Senator Obama does not need to be tainted by the Clinton baggage. I'm a 60+ senior, so I was around when all the stuff hit the papers and tv about both Clintons. Some would argue that happened several yrs. ago. But some of the reported financial dealings former President Clinton is currently( and /or has been in the recent past) involved in-makes me wonder if history repeates itsself in the 21st century?
  • pacatrue
    Such a declaration of an Obama/Clinton ticket would surely help reduce the current antagonization between each candidate's supporters; however, as the VP is (or especially can be) a critical post, any ticket ideas should only be presented after several weeks of serious thought and interviews.
  • It will never happen.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice/Joe Gandelman | Designed by Elegant Themes | Customized by Tyrone Steels II/Enxit Group, LLC