An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

In Texas, an Ivins-fulfilling prophecy

I sure do wish Molly Ivins were alive and writing about the vote in Texas this week. The rest of us writers can and will try, but we all know, particularly us old Texans who know who Molly Ivins was, that we’d all come in a damn near invisible second, if God decided to hook Molly onto Eternal Press International, and let her description of this election appear in tomorrow morning’s editions.

It has been just a little over a year since Molly Ivins died, and I wonder how many thousands of Texans have suddenly sat up straight in the last couple of weeks and cussed the fates that she, and they, are going to miss the story that, above all others, she was meant to write.

The funny, and typical, thing, is that she saw this story coming. She may even be responsible for it, a self-fulfilling Molly Ivins prophecy. It would be interesting to go back and see who in the Democratic Party read her column of Jan. 20, 2006, dateline Austin, distributed nationally by Creators Syndicate. It began:

“I’d like to make it clear to the people who run the Democratic Party that I will not support Hillary Clinton for president . . . Sen. Clinton is apparently incapable of taking a clear stand on the war in Iraq, and that alone is enough to disqualify her. Her failure to speak out on Terri Schiavo, not to mention that gross pandering on flag-burning, are just contemptible little dodges . . . “

If you aren’t familiar with the Ivins style, she tended to not hold back, and she did it with humor, and a pure feel for her native vernacular. To-wit: “I’ve said it before: War brings out the patriotic bullies. In World War I, they went around kicking dachshunds on the grounds that dachshunds were ‘German dogs.’ They did not, however, go around kicking German shepherds. The MINUTE someone impugns your patriotism by opposing this (Iraq) war, turn on them like a snarling dog and explain what loving your country really means. That, or you could just piss on them elegantly, as Rep. John Murtha did.”

Molly wrote this by way of lecturing the Democratic Party on “political courage and heroes, and when a country is desperate for leadership. There are times when regular politics will not do, and this is one of those times. There are times a country is so tired of bull that only the truth can provide relief.”

At that time, January of 2006, the country was so tired of bull that events leading to the Democratic victories in the midterm congressional elections were already clicking into place, and Hillary was emerging as a leading party candidate in the 2008 presidential election. Clearly, she was not Molly’s gal.

“Enough,” she wrote. “Enough triangulation, calculation and equivocation. Enough clever straddling, enough not offending anyone.”

Then Molly Ivins wrote:

“If no one in conventional-wisdom politics has the courage to speak up and say what needs to be said, then you go out and find some obscure junior senator from Minnesota with the guts to do it.”

Well, he turned out not to be from Minnesota, but from Illinois, and here he is, front and center in Texas. Damn, this would have been the perfect Molly Ivins story. It has her brand all over it.

Cross-posted from my blog.

  • PaulSilver
    I agree that Molly would have been excited about Obama for his relatively lesser hypocrisy and political bullshit. I also suspect that she would have been delighted by the political enthusiasm of the public and hopeful for a progressive resurgence in Texas and the Country.
  • Macan
    Then Molly Ivins wrote: “If no one in conventional-wisdom politics has the courage to speak up and say what needs to be said, then you go out and find some obscure junior senator from Minnesota with the guts to do it.”

    "Guts"? Hmmm....

    From the arch-Republican McCain loving New York Times: "In 1999, Barack Obama was faced with a difficult vote in the Ilinois legislature — to support a bill that would let some juveniles be tried as adults, a position that risked drawing fire from African-Americans, or to oppose it, possibly undermining his image as a tough-on-crime moderate.
    In the end, Mr. Obama chose neither to vote for nor against the bil. He voted “present,” effectively sidestepping the issue, an option he invoked nearly 130 times as a state senator."
    “If you are worried about your next election, the present vote gives you political cover,” said Kent D. Redfield, a professor of political studies at the University of Illinois at Springfield. “This is an option that does not exist in every state and reflects Illinois political culture.”

    Given Obama's profile in political courage... one suspects Molly Ivin's ghost is sitting this one out...just looking forward to "Shrub" being uprooted from Pennsylvania Ave. in '09.
  • DLS
    Wasn't Obama on the side of the powerful air traffic controllers' union? That might have made Ivins proud.

    http://obama.senate.gov/news/060127-faa_and_con...
  • vwcat
    Macan, I bet you are not from Illinois. Thought so. If you were you would know the rules of present votes here.
    Present is used for tactical or strategic reasons or for an unrecorded no vote because of a technical reason in the bill.
    Maybe if you would bother finding out about things before posting you would not look so silly.

    As for Molly,
    I loved her. She was one of my favorites and have wondered the past few weeks what she would think about this election.
    I read that column about not voting for Hillary and amen'd every part of it as I would never vote for her either. She is the furtherest thing from progressive and will lie to a person's face and never blink.
    Thank goodness my senator is teaching her something about the expiration date on the old politics of the 90s and how passe it is.
  • JSpencer
    I was a huge fan of Molly's and dearly wish she was here for this election. Nobody could cut through the BS the way she could. I don't buy for a second the suggestion she would be "sitting this one out" either. She was too passionate about American democracy to not be in the thick of it. I think she would have liked Obama too, but one thing is certain, she would have savored the coming Bush eviction.
  • AustinRoth
    I hated her 'nails on a chalkboard' writing, and maybe agreed with 5 or 6 columns over the years.

    However, as with Shaun here, poking with sticks at columnists you disagree with is a long-time American tradition, and while i can't stand most of eithers content, I give them their just dues as very talented columnists.

    That said, Molly did have a way of seeing through BS. She also had a VERY low tolerance for style over substance or cult of personalities.

    That said, I am not so sure she would have been as big a Obama supporter as some of you think. There is a good chance her BS meter may have gone off in his presence.

    IMHO
  • AustinRoth, her voice was 'nails on a chalkboard' too. I was never too impressed with her.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC