An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Hillary Clinton’s Hissy Problem . . .

01aaclin_030108.jpg

Kathy was a girl about my age who lived down the street from me when we were a few years short of our teens. She was an only child and was spoiled rotten. She also had the most and nicest toys in the neighborhood and I and other kids often ended up in her playroom.

Woe be it to the playmate who didn’t see or do things Kathy’s way because she would hold her breath, begin turning a bilious shade of green and shriek “These are my toys and you play by my rules!”

Kathy came to mind when I read of Hillary Clinton’s latest and greatest breath-holding exercise courtesy of Mark Penn, who has all but wrapped up the prize for the most inept management of a presidential campaign in modern American political history:

If Barack Obama doesn’t win the Texas, Ohio, Vermont and Rhode Island primaries big on Tuesday it means that he’s in trouble.

Clinton herself later clarified this flapdoodle by saying that if Obama loses any of those primaries then it shows that voters are having second thoughts about him.

This spin is, of course is from a campaign that has gotten clobbered in the last 11 primaries by substantial margins and as has happened in so many other states that seemed tailor-made for Clinton, has seen its lead in the polls in Texas and Ohio evaporate.

For what it’s worth, Obama has had Vermont in the bag from the jump but could conceivably lose in Rhode Island.

Got that? He loses Rhode Island and its 20 delegates and Kathy . . . er, Hillary is the one!

The reality outside of the Clinton playroom is, of course, very different as a sobering analysis by Marc Ambinder shows:

Clinton in theory could still take the nomination if she wins in Texas and Ohio by 65 percent, Florida and Michigan’s delegations are seated fully to her advantage and all other percentages hold.

Whew!

  • cosmoetica
    Shaun: Be thankful Holly, Jill and Damozel didn't neuter you during their group hissy fit, because, after all, you started things by using the word, and they'll end it with the thing itself.
  • Thanks, Shaun - as I wrote in Holly's thread in response to this, I agree.
    But I would also like to put in here for the record that at least in the Ohio blogs, if you say anything that remotely relates to Obama that doesn't reflect positively on him - even you are voting for him - you get slammed. Now, that's having a hissy too.

    So - I will toss this off to my being a purist when it comes to narrative writing: tell me what it is you're observing - then I'll decide if I think it's hissy or not. I work with a group of second graders on writing a monthly journal for their class and you can't imagine (unless you have a second grader) how many times we have this conversation:

    Me: "So - how was the "fill in the blank event"?

    kid: "It was GREAT!"

    ME: Ok - what was great about it?

    Kid: It was FUN!"

    Me: Ok- what was fun about it?

    Kid: They were CRAZY!

    Me: Ok - what was crazy about it?

    kid: It was WILD!

    Me: Ok - what was wild about it?

    I do change my questions eventually - tell me what you saw or heard that made you think it was wild - were the people speaking really faster than a television commerical and throwing food around like a cafeteria food fight and making faces at you like they wanted to make you laugh and wearing clown clothes in all different colors?

    :)
  • shaun
    Jillmz:

    This belated comment is being cross-posted at Holly's brief and much commented on post regarding Clinton.

    We would be reading more about "the way things are" if Clinton didn't try to change the rules or say they should be changed, among other things, when things don't go her way. The Michigan and Florida delegations, Nevada caucuses, Texas primary rules and superdelegate rules are but four examples. Additionally, she keeps trying to move the goalposts, the latest instance being the most ridiculous. In this context my comparison to my childhood friend Kathy is most apt.
  • DLS do you read Matt Bai at all? He wrote me a year or two ago, in response to something I asked him, that identity politics doesn't really exist. Just saying. lol For some people it does, for others, it doesn't. In the U.S. today, that some do some don't seems to say it all. It's why we are work so hard to keep up a democracy in which the losing party and candidate and voters don't stampede. No one said that doing so was easy.
  • cosmoetica
    Shaun: I have it on good authority that this post as driven Holly Robinson foaming to the madhouse. Shame on you!
  • DLS
    "some people really prefer her - in fact a lot of people do"

    That includes my rad-lib friend in DC (self-admitted); identity politics (reverse racism and sexism) on the Left is the big theme underpinning the Choice the normal Dem voters face this year. When there's an eventual winner and loser, a lot of people (those who lose the contest along with the candidate) will be sad. Not that they'll stampede to vote GOP in retaliation, you understand! (I'm sure you do)
  • DLS
    Bush didn't have a mandate in 2004 and the Dems and their supporters have even less of a claim to that in 2006 (which was not pro-Dem but anti-GOP). In this year's election, even, while some find Obama appealing (and the childish and naive have made him their messiah already, casting reality as well as their inhibitions or questions aside -- how often have we heard that Baby Boomer being called a post-Boomer, for example?), it's also a tiresome reaction continued from the 2006 elections, tired of a dysfunctional GOP as well as disappointed or disgraced by Bush. (I leave the true hatred and the cheap shots at Bush and at others to the pathological people and the failures in our society.)
  • Shaun - let me ask you this sincerely - why do you think that we're rarely reading stories that highlight how this struggle for the nomination represents the way things are: that is, some people really prefer her - in fact a lot of people do. And some people really prefer him, in fact a lot of people do

    I don't mean to be overly simplistic, but let me try it this way: I remember after Bush won in 2004, people were calling it a "mandate" and using other words that would convey the idea that Americans were incredibly united behind him and voted for him overwhelmingly - I think that that word was even used.

    But the fact is, he garnered just over 50% of the popular vote. That is not a "mandate." And yet many in the media went on to talk about his win as though Americans spoke in a singular voice when voting.

    Do you see what I mean?
  • distributorcap
    you gotta love this latest spin from Mark Penn--- can you please tell me - WHO IS BUYING IT?

    it is Penn and Wolfson's Laugh In !
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC