
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buying Votes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/18092/buying-votes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18092/buying-votes/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 10:59:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritt11</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18092/buying-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-152335</link>
		<dc:creator>kritt11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/campaign-reform/18092/buying-votes/#comment-152335</guid>
		<description>Greendreams- That is one of Obama&#039;s most appealing qualities. My biggest gripe with the GOP (besides rubberstamping Bush policies and appointees) has been their willingness to back industrial interests over consumers  at every opportunity. They are forced to do this because their voting patterns do not benefit the average citizen---which is why their donations from individual donors are way down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greendreams- That is one of Obama&#39;s most appealing qualities. My biggest gripe with the GOP (besides rubberstamping Bush policies and appointees) has been their willingness to back industrial interests over consumers  at every opportunity. They are forced to do this because their voting patterns do not benefit the average citizen&#8212;which is why their donations from individual donors are way down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18092/buying-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-152334</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/campaign-reform/18092/buying-votes/#comment-152334</guid>
		<description>MSNBC reports half of Obama&#039;s take is from one million plus individuals giving average $50 donations, half from donations of $1k-2.3k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSNBC reports half of Obama&#39;s take is from one million plus individuals giving average $50 donations, half from donations of $1k-2.3k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacatrue</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18092/buying-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-152333</link>
		<dc:creator>pacatrue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/campaign-reform/18092/buying-votes/#comment-152333</guid>
		<description>Veiling the donation is interesting. Is it completely antithetical to the idea of sunshine reform in which we at least know which donors the politician is in the pocket of? I can&#039;t make them work together. I also can&#039;t see how veiling donations could possibly work with fund raising, in which the fund raisers primary goal is to build a personal relationship between the donor and the cause to be supported.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is sort of an aside, but Bush became almost legendary in his first 4 years by being able to hold dinners at $1000 a plate and packing the house. This had always been done by both parties, but the RNC became kings of it for some time. I assume Obama must do the same, but does he? Or is it almost all through the internet for him? Anyone know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veiling the donation is interesting. Is it completely antithetical to the idea of sunshine reform in which we at least know which donors the politician is in the pocket of? I can&#39;t make them work together. I also can&#39;t see how veiling donations could possibly work with fund raising, in which the fund raisers primary goal is to build a personal relationship between the donor and the cause to be supported.</p>
<p>This is sort of an aside, but Bush became almost legendary in his first 4 years by being able to hold dinners at $1000 a plate and packing the house. This had always been done by both parties, but the RNC became kings of it for some time. I assume Obama must do the same, but does he? Or is it almost all through the internet for him? Anyone know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSilver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18092/buying-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-152332</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/campaign-reform/18092/buying-votes/#comment-152332</guid>
		<description>Veiling the source of the funds would require the cooperation of the donators to work? Right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The idea is that a donor can give money to a candidate who they support, but the candidate would not know who gave them the money.   I imagine that a donor could simply write a note saying &quot;Hey Bob I just donated $10,000 to you&quot;.  Perhaps the escrow agent could release the funds in such a way that the link to the donor is harder to make.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is not my favorite remedy but I find it valuable to consider all the angles.  My favorite so far is Public Financing in proportion to the number of small donors a candidate can attract, along with funds to match third party campaigns.  With the Source of the funds mostly from the Media industry who are ultimately the main recipients of the campaign expenditures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veiling the source of the funds would require the cooperation of the donators to work? Right?</p>
<p>The idea is that a donor can give money to a candidate who they support, but the candidate would not know who gave them the money.   I imagine that a donor could simply write a note saying &#8220;Hey Bob I just donated $10,000 to you&#8221;.  Perhaps the escrow agent could release the funds in such a way that the link to the donor is harder to make.   </p>
<p>This is not my favorite remedy but I find it valuable to consider all the angles.  My favorite so far is Public Financing in proportion to the number of small donors a candidate can attract, along with funds to match third party campaigns.  With the Source of the funds mostly from the Media industry who are ultimately the main recipients of the campaign expenditures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: my cash now</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18092/buying-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-110829</link>
		<dc:creator>my cash now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/campaign-reform/18092/buying-votes/#comment-110829</guid>
		<description>[...] Buying Votes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Buying Votes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18092/buying-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-152331</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/campaign-reform/18092/buying-votes/#comment-152331</guid>
		<description>We already know McCain-Renzi wasn&#039;t going to happen this year.  [grin]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We already know McCain-Renzi wasn&#39;t going to happen this year.  [grin]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWWW</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/18092/buying-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-152330</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/campaign-reform/18092/buying-votes/#comment-152330</guid>
		<description>Veiling the source of the funds would require the cooperation of the donators to work? Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veiling the source of the funds would require the cooperation of the donators to work? Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

