An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

McCain’s Supporters’ Low Road

Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo observes the Road Map for McCain’s campaign against Obama.

Hopefully, everyone can now see the McCain strategy for running against Barack Obama. Yes, we have some general points on taxes, culture wars and McCain as war hero who can protect us in ways that flash-in-the-pan pretty boy Barack Obama can’t.

But that’s not the core. The core is to drill a handful of key adjectives into the public mind about Barack Obama: Muslim, anti-American, BLACK, terrorist, Arab. Maybe a little hustler and shifty thrown in, but we’ll have to see. The details and specific arguments are sort of beside the point.

Josh observes that the Candidate maintains plausible deniability while surrogates do the dirty work. It seems to me that Senator Clinton’s campaign has suffered by using these old-fashioned tactics. I can only hope that most citizens are growing tired of this kind of distraction and will reward the candidate, and perhaps even the Party, with the more civilized campaign.

But, not to mince words, it is my observation that the GOP harbors more dirty street fighters than the Democrats. And it makes sense, since for many in the GOP, the ends justify the means, while the Democrats tend to identify more with the means and have a bit more remorse about taking steps back in social progress.

  • GeorgeSorwell
    I agree.

    And the time to start fighting back is now.
  • kritt11
    Clinton's campaign did suffer from using similar tactics. I guess it depends on whether the public buys McCain 'plausible deniability" or not. They didn't buy Clinton's, altho I think her husbands attacks on Obama did as much damage as the surrogates inferences. Its both mean AND cowardly, and brings to mind the GOP's tactics during the midterms, when no one could trace who was accountable for their lowdown campaign ads linking Democrats with terrorism.
  • CStanley
    Can't cut and paste for some reason, but that last sentence was a doozy (I'm seeing a lot of those in your closing statements lately, Paul.) How can you justify making claims like that (that the GOP puts the ends above the means more than the Dems do?) Even Kim points out Clinton's tendency toward that (a perfect example goes back to her first days in the WH when we now know she was exchanging memos about how to use character assassination against anyone who opposed her healthcare agenda.)
  • PaulSilver
    CStanley,
    I can justify my statement because those are my observations over 40 years as an engaged voter. While both parties take the low road, it seems to me that the GOP does it more often.
    That the GOP acts as if the ends justify the means is best and most recently demonstrated by the canard to get into Iraq and create the boon for the Military Industrial complex with very little resistance or protest from the GOP rank and file.
    Have the Democrats done something of that magnitude?
  • CStanley
    Uh, obviously the rank and file who didn't protest simply didn't agree with you that it was a canard, Paul. Stating your opinion as fact doesn't make it so.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC