An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Health Insurance Answers Depend on What Question We Ask

This election season we have heard a lot about “health care reform” and “health insurance reform”. Senator Clinton and Senator Obama have been sparring over the issue most of the month. On the other side of the aisle, Senator McCain has also had to address the issue of health care. Everyone agrees we have a “problem” when it comes to health care and health insurance, but there are wildly varying opinions about what should be done.

We all know that almost 47 million Americans do not have health insurance, and that this number has risen every year since 2001. That’s roughly one out of every 6 people. That is a problem for our workforce because we have workers who may put off or simply not seek medical care, to say nothing of the increased havoc that an epidemic or pandemic might cause in the absence people seeking timely, affordable health care. This is also a problem economically because somebody has to pay the hospital bills when the uninsured become so sick they can no longer avoid the doctor, and because medical expenses are a leading cause of bankruptcy.

So an obvious question to ask is “Why don’t these 47 million people have health insurance?” And there’s a quick, easy, wrong answer: since we also all know that in the United States, most people who have health insurance get it through their employer, there must be a lot of employers who are not providing health insurance to their employees. There’s a germ of truth here: “As costs climb, the number of firms offering health insurance falls. The study found that while 98% of firms with more than 200 workers still provide some sort of employee health benefits, only 60% of smaller companies do.” So the obvious answer — endorsed by Clinton and Obama and Romney and Schwarzenegger to name just a few — is to mandate that your boss get you into a group health insurance plan.

What? Do I hear laughter? That must be from the 4.9% of you who are unemployed, and this is the first good laugh over health insurance you’ve had since getting that sick joke known as a COBRA notice. Or maybe you are one of the 20 million self-employed. Or maybe you are a child. After all, children don’t have employers.

So again the obvious but wrong answer is to mandate all these people obtain coverage for themselves. Oh, and for their children. But this ignores all the other possible answers to “Why don’t these 47 million Americans have health insurance?” If we start looking for other answers, we might hear about skyrocketing premiums for declining benefits; we might learn about people with pre-existing conditions and people who avoid medical tests for fear of uncovering one; we might meet people who had health insurance — until they actually got sick and needed it; we might be saddened to learn about people who died because a paperwork mistake meant they didn’t have the insurance they needed.

Sure, we could have some sort of pool where people who don’t have employer-provided health insurance could buy coverage. But almost none of the plans being circulated would do a thing to make insurance companies cover people who actually need health care at reasonable prices. Our candidates instead ask us to line up and make sure these for-profit insurance companies get their premiums every month.

Most Americans believe we need radical change in the way we pay for medical care; most candidates are offering us bandages for a broken system.

  • Jim_Satterfield
    A very accurate assessment, Bridget. Conservatives say they want to break the job/insurance link by creating a system that allows everyone to buy their own insurance. First, I have yet to see a proposal from them that would actually accomplish this for those who have problems in the existing system. In addition as you noted it completely ignores that inconvenient fact of life called unemployment even as reports show that the length of time that many people who lose their jobs spend unemployed is getting longer.
  • Macan
    As a conservative from a different country, I do not understand the irrational antipathy of American conservatives for socialized medicine.

    Yes, it is often inefficient and bureaucratic. But it is the one great achievement of the welfare state...and still more efficient by all measures than the costly American system.

    This is a very sad post, really. It is hard to look upon the present state of affairs in the US in this regard, as Bridget lays it out, without sadness at the human toll.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    Our candidates instead ask us to line up and make sure these for-profit insurance companies get their premiums every month.


    Bridget is completely right.

    And the only thing I can add to Macan's comment is this: do you really think your private insurance carriers are more efficient or less bureaucratic than than the government is?
  • superdestroyer
    The posting is disingenuous because it kept using the term Health Insurance when it really meant health costs. When discussing health plans there is no discussion of actuarial issues, grouped risks, or out year costs. Instead, the proposed health plans are just a means of asking everyone to pay for collective medical costs,. The usual means of collectivizing costs is the proposalthat taxpayers pay the health costs of those who do not pay taxes. Thus, wage earning middle class Americans will pay more taxes so that tax cheats, non-working 20 somethings, and others do not have to contribute to their own health costs.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC