Comments on: Twenty-Three Questions for Tonight’s Debate http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/ An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:19:03 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: truedemocracy http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-138737 truedemocracy Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:08:37 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/#comment-138737 I want to first of all ,praise AMERICA for her being the father and the founder of TRUE DEMOCRACY world-wide. Suffice me to say that America has been known and reverenced as the number one christian nations where the hope of we christians is anchored and in christ.<br>As christians it is believed that heavens rejoices over one sinner that repents more than over 99 persons who needs no further repentance. Obama said that he is a born aagain christian and have been practicing christianity for over 20years; he believe in GOD and his country. Why is he been held against his birth background and names which he did not give himself? Talk about the way he has cheated America or the areas he failed to do what he should have ,and i will agree you have a case against him.<br>You people seem to be trying to slaughter a devine CANDIDATE on the alter of setiments; OBAMA is BLACK, yet the BLACKS him accepted unconditionally even though his Mother is white. Why can't all white do the same? mr CUNNIGHAM was talking boldly and derogatively about OBAMA having a midlle name called HUSSEIN. Does it mean that the name is now synonimous with evil simply because there was a bad SADDAM HUSSEIN? Did CUNNINGHAM name himself or played a role in his background to be born WHITE?<br>The quest for experience as a major criteria for the presidency has pummelled America into the present abys that we found ourselves today. How many experiences had BILL CLITTON when he ruled and made his mark there? <br>The problem we Americans really have is not the problem of selection , but the problem of making some selected house-hold to lead us always. People are shouting Bush this , Bush that when they had a chance to choose a JOHN KERRY and threw him away on the setiment of NAME; because BUSH father was a president so should be his son . DOn't worry fellow AMERICANS if you pick CLINTON today , by the time she finishes her 8years tenure, BUSH wife shall be ready and after bush 's wife will come their children of course CHELSEA already warming up and gradually being introduced. IF ONLY AMERICANS CAN LOOK BEYOND SKIN COLOURS AND CONCENTRATE ON THE DRIVE, THE VISION , THE CHARISMA , THE WISDOM(which doesn't depend on age but gift from GOD), THE STRENGHT AND THE UNIFYING FACTOR . then they will see a gift in OBAMA.<br>somebody once gave as a reason why OBAMA should not be voted as the ' fact that if OBAMA is insulted he doesn't retaliate" shouldn't that be the reason why he should even be voted? AS christians JESUS gave us a perfect example of that ;then if OBAMA can do that ,that attests to his Christian faith. I rest my case. I want to first of all ,praise AMERICA for her being the father and the founder of TRUE DEMOCRACY world-wide. Suffice me to say that America has been known and reverenced as the number one christian nations where the hope of we christians is anchored and in christ.
As christians it is believed that heavens rejoices over one sinner that repents more than over 99 persons who needs no further repentance. Obama said that he is a born aagain christian and have been practicing christianity for over 20years; he believe in GOD and his country. Why is he been held against his birth background and names which he did not give himself? Talk about the way he has cheated America or the areas he failed to do what he should have ,and i will agree you have a case against him.
You people seem to be trying to slaughter a devine CANDIDATE on the alter of setiments; OBAMA is BLACK, yet the BLACKS him accepted unconditionally even though his Mother is white. Why can't all white do the same? mr CUNNIGHAM was talking boldly and derogatively about OBAMA having a midlle name called HUSSEIN. Does it mean that the name is now synonimous with evil simply because there was a bad SADDAM HUSSEIN? Did CUNNINGHAM name himself or played a role in his background to be born WHITE?
The quest for experience as a major criteria for the presidency has pummelled America into the present abys that we found ourselves today. How many experiences had BILL CLITTON when he ruled and made his mark there?
The problem we Americans really have is not the problem of selection , but the problem of making some selected house-hold to lead us always. People are shouting Bush this , Bush that when they had a chance to choose a JOHN KERRY and threw him away on the setiment of NAME; because BUSH father was a president so should be his son . DOn't worry fellow AMERICANS if you pick CLINTON today , by the time she finishes her 8years tenure, BUSH wife shall be ready and after bush 's wife will come their children of course CHELSEA already warming up and gradually being introduced. IF ONLY AMERICANS CAN LOOK BEYOND SKIN COLOURS AND CONCENTRATE ON THE DRIVE, THE VISION , THE CHARISMA , THE WISDOM(which doesn't depend on age but gift from GOD), THE STRENGHT AND THE UNIFYING FACTOR . then they will see a gift in OBAMA.
somebody once gave as a reason why OBAMA should not be voted as the ' fact that if OBAMA is insulted he doesn't retaliate” shouldn't that be the reason why he should even be voted? AS christians JESUS gave us a perfect example of that ;then if OBAMA can do that ,that attests to his Christian faith. I rest my case.

]]> By: archangel http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-138736 archangel Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:50:55 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/#comment-138736 Tim Russert's job should go to you MJD. The reportage in most directions tonight was either just boring gossip, obvious details, or just vapid. I'm thinking about the whole debate, was there any there, there? You're prescient. I lay it to the questioners' style. The 'questioners' too often appear to confuse being 'hard on people' with having depth. Sad squander of a stage so rich. I sense however, that unreported tensions are about to burst. We'll see. Thanks.<br><br>dr.e Tim Russert's job should go to you MJD. The reportage in most directions tonight was either just boring gossip, obvious details, or just vapid. I'm thinking about the whole debate, was there any there, there? You're prescient. I lay it to the questioners' style. The 'questioners' too often appear to confuse being 'hard on people' with having depth. Sad squander of a stage so rich. I sense however, that unreported tensions are about to burst. We'll see. Thanks.

dr.e

]]> By: tonight s debate Trendy Here! http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-110793 tonight s debate Trendy Here! Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:54:31 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/#comment-110793 [...] recitation of their by-now canned set-pieces in response to equally predictable questions, … credit : [...] [...] recitation of their by-now canned set-pieces in response to equally predictable questions, … credit : [...]

]]> By: StockBoySF http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-138735 StockBoySF Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:05:21 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/#comment-138735 Mark, great questions! I hope they can be asked to McCain and Obama when they debate (at least the ones that can apply to McCain). Thanks! Mark, great questions! I hope they can be asked to McCain and Obama when they debate (at least the ones that can apply to McCain). Thanks!

]]> By: health information » Blog Archive » Twenty-Three Questions for Tonight’s Debate http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-110790 health information » Blog Archive » Twenty-Three Questions for Tonight’s Debate Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:44:44 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/#comment-110790 [...] Read the rest of this great post here [...] [...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]

]]> By: morton_rodney http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-138734 morton_rodney Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:42:05 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/#comment-138734 These are all excellent questions...That should have been asked THREE MONTHS AGO!!! It is far past the point when we should have been asking tough, campaign defining questions such as these. Most constituents, at this point, either already know the answers to these questions or don't care. This debate should be about polishing their closing arguments, fine tuning their rhetoric, and trying to push the other candidates to define their differences. We are far past the point of broad brush stroke questions. These are all excellent questions…That should have been asked THREE MONTHS AGO!!! It is far past the point when we should have been asking tough, campaign defining questions such as these. Most constituents, at this point, either already know the answers to these questions or don't care. This debate should be about polishing their closing arguments, fine tuning their rhetoric, and trying to push the other candidates to define their differences. We are far past the point of broad brush stroke questions.

]]> By: cosmoetica http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-138733 cosmoetica Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:41:24 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/#comment-138733 Good q's, but in an age of Youtube level discourse, forget about it!<br><br>As for Mia: Hillary's eyes were a bit bugged out when she was casting shame, odd considering his flyers were nothing in comparison to her camp's tactics. I think Hill simply cannot believe that people could say no to her 'right' to be Prez. Good q's, but in an age of Youtube level discourse, forget about it!

As for Mia: Hillary's eyes were a bit bugged out when she was casting shame, odd considering his flyers were nothing in comparison to her camp's tactics. I think Hill simply cannot believe that people could say no to her 'right' to be Prez.

]]> By: Slamfu http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-138732 Slamfu Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:19:16 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/#comment-138732 Thats going a bit overboard. I really hate it when people start refering to political rivals as unhinged when they are nothing of the sort. Its simply a close and hard fought race, she's slipping. I haven't once heard her flip out or appear "unstable" and neither have you. I just don't get why people have to go all drama queen when the real story is plenty interesting enough. Thats going a bit overboard. I really hate it when people start refering to political rivals as unhinged when they are nothing of the sort. Its simply a close and hard fought race, she's slipping. I haven't once heard her flip out or appear “unstable” and neither have you. I just don't get why people have to go all drama queen when the real story is plenty interesting enough.

]]> By: MJDaniels53 http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-138731 MJDaniels53 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:04:53 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/#comment-138731 Mia:<br>I think that Senator Clinton, who began her campaign with what seemed like prohibitive advantages, has squandered them. But I think that your indictment is harsh. She may be desperate, but she's not irrational or unstable. <br><br>Mark Mia:
I think that Senator Clinton, who began her campaign with what seemed like prohibitive advantages, has squandered them. But I think that your indictment is harsh. She may be desperate, but she's not irrational or unstable.

Mark

]]> By: mia http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-138730 mia Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:31:08 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/#comment-138730 These are all excellent questions, but the truth is, unless Obama makes a HUGE mistake in tonight's debate, this race is over for Clinton! She's all over the place as of late. She's lost all credibility!<br><br><br>The more she talks (yells) the crazier she sounds. She has absolutely no clue at all what this race is all about!<br><br><br>She keeps preaching "experience" when people want "change." She claims to know how to "work the levers" in Washington even though we all know the levers are broken!<br><br><br>She appears to be irrational, unstable, and desperate (with a split personality thrown in for good measure)...<br><br><br>"I'm proud to be on the stage with you"...<br><br><br>"Shame on you"...<br><br><br>"Let's have a real campaign"...<br><br><br>"I mean, let's have a smear campaign in which I accuse you of being a radical Muslim and circulate photos of you dressed like the Taliban."<br><br><br>Who can keep up? Pundits now call it the "Kitchen Sink" tactic. I call it mud slinging - just keep slinging and slinging - and see what might stick!<br><br><br>I keep waiting for the total meltdown when her head starts to spin and she keeps repeating, "SHAME ON YOU, AMERICA!" "VOTE FOR ME!" "SHAME ON YOU, AMERICA!" "VOTE FOR ME!" "SHAME ON YOU, AMERICA!" "VOTE FOR ME!" "SHAME ON YOU, AMERICA!" "VOTE FOR ME!"<br><br><br>She's run a crazy campaign devoid of any rhyme or reason. How can we possibly trust her to run the country??? These are all excellent questions, but the truth is, unless Obama makes a HUGE mistake in tonight's debate, this race is over for Clinton! She's all over the place as of late. She's lost all credibility!

The more she talks (yells) the crazier she sounds. She has absolutely no clue at all what this race is all about!

She keeps preaching “experience” when people want “change.” She claims to know how to “work the levers” in Washington even though we all know the levers are broken!

She appears to be irrational, unstable, and desperate (with a split personality thrown in for good measure)…

“I'm proud to be on the stage with you”…

“Shame on you”…

“Let's have a real campaign”…

“I mean, let's have a smear campaign in which I accuse you of being a radical Muslim and circulate photos of you dressed like the Taliban.”

Who can keep up? Pundits now call it the “Kitchen Sink” tactic. I call it mud slinging – just keep slinging and slinging – and see what might stick!

I keep waiting for the total meltdown when her head starts to spin and she keeps repeating, “SHAME ON YOU, AMERICA!” “VOTE FOR ME!” “SHAME ON YOU, AMERICA!” “VOTE FOR ME!” “SHAME ON YOU, AMERICA!” “VOTE FOR ME!” “SHAME ON YOU, AMERICA!” “VOTE FOR ME!”

She's run a crazy campaign devoid of any rhyme or reason. How can we possibly trust her to run the country???

]]> By: pacatrue http://themoderatevoice.com/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-138729 pacatrue Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:19:57 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18039/twenty-three-questions-for-tonights-debate/#comment-138729 I wouldn't mind hearing answers on many of these. I wouldn't mind hearing answers on many of these.

]]>