<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:17:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Presidential election 2008 &#124;Republicans Vs. Democrats &#187; Is Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch?</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-110746</link>
		<dc:creator>Presidential election 2008 &#124;Republicans Vs. Democrats &#187; Is Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bill-clinton/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/#comment-110746</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptHillary Clinton apparently thought that she had a killer sound bite during Thursday’s debate when she ripped Barack Obama as a promoter of “change your can Xerox.” Instead, the audience booed, critics winced and once again the New York &#8230;   Read the rest of this great post here    Posted by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptHillary Clinton apparently thought that she had a killer sound bite during Thursday’s debate when she ripped Barack Obama as a promoter of “change your can Xerox.” Instead, the audience booed, critics winced and once again the New York &#8230;   Read the rest of this great post here    Posted by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGrandPanjandrum</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-130206</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGrandPanjandrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bill-clinton/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/#comment-130206</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s inside her &lt;a href=&quot;http://thegrandpanjandrum.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/hes-in-her-ooda-loop/&quot;&gt;OODA loop.&lt;/a&gt; Judging by the responses from a good portion of the liberal blogosphere the Clinton campaign has been out thought and out maneuvered. Again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#39;s inside her <a href="http://thegrandpanjandrum.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/hes-in-her-ooda-loop/">OODA loop.</a> Judging by the responses from a good portion of the liberal blogosphere the Clinton campaign has been out thought and out maneuvered. Again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-130205</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bill-clinton/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/#comment-130205</guid>
		<description>Yup, let&#039;s move past that cheap shot xerox comment, it was stupid and didn&#039;t mean anything.  The audience&#039;s reaction pretty much told the whole story.  The media should focus on more substantive issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, let&#39;s move past that cheap shot xerox comment, it was stupid and didn&#39;t mean anything.  The audience&#39;s reaction pretty much told the whole story.  The media should focus on more substantive issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Bush &#187; Is Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED)</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-110743</link>
		<dc:creator>President Bush &#187; Is Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bill-clinton/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/#comment-110743</guid>
		<description>[...] The Moderate Voice - Domestic and international news analysis, irreverent comments, original reporti... wrote an interesting post today on Is Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED)Here&#8217;s a quick excerptIs Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED) February 23rd, 2008 by JOE GANDELMAN It’s a given that when things get tough in a campaign, or when a candidate needs to drive up a popular opponent’s “negatives” that he or she will be advised to “go negative.” But has Campaign 2008 underscored negative campaigning’s risks and limits? McClatchy Newspaper’s David Lightman thinks so and details some of the reasons why negative campaigning this season ain’t what it’s cracked up t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Moderate Voice &#8211; Domestic and international news analysis, irreverent comments, original reporti&#8230; wrote an interesting post today on Is Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED)Here&#8217;s a quick excerptIs Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED) February 23rd, 2008 by JOE GANDELMAN It’s a given that when things get tough in a campaign, or when a candidate needs to drive up a popular opponent’s “negatives” that he or she will be advised to “go negative.” But has Campaign 2008 underscored negative campaigning’s risks and limits? McClatchy Newspaper’s David Lightman thinks so and details some of the reasons why negative campaigning this season ain’t what it’s cracked up t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.s. Presidential Primary &#187; Is Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED)</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-110742</link>
		<dc:creator>U.s. Presidential Primary &#187; Is Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bill-clinton/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/#comment-110742</guid>
		<description>[...] The Moderate Voice - Domestic and international news analysis, irreverent comments, original reporti... wrote an interesting post today on Is Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED)Here&#8217;s a quick excerptIs Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED) February 23rd, 2008 by JOE GANDELMAN It’s a given that when things get tough in a campaign, or when a candidate needs to drive up a popular opponent’s “negatives” that he or she will be advised to “go negative.” But has Campaign 2008 underscored negative campaigning’s risks and limits? McClatchy Newspaper’s David Lightman thinks so and details some of the reasons why negative campaigning this season ain’t what it’s cracked up t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Moderate Voice &#8211; Domestic and international news analysis, irreverent comments, original reporti&#8230; wrote an interesting post today on Is Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED)Here&#8217;s a quick excerptIs Negative Campaigning Losing Its Positive Punch? (UPDATED) February 23rd, 2008 by JOE GANDELMAN It’s a given that when things get tough in a campaign, or when a candidate needs to drive up a popular opponent’s “negatives” that he or she will be advised to “go negative.” But has Campaign 2008 underscored negative campaigning’s risks and limits? McClatchy Newspaper’s David Lightman thinks so and details some of the reasons why negative campaigning this season ain’t what it’s cracked up t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-130202</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bill-clinton/17969/is-negative-campaigning-losing-its-positive-punch/#comment-130202</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t misread or hype what happened with the Xerox remark.  That was a cheap shot that went nowhere because it was worthless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t misread or hype what happened with the Xerox remark.  That was a cheap shot that went nowhere because it was worthless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
