
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is John Edwards to do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 07:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmoetica</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140821</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmoetica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140821</guid>
		<description>Kanz: I missed no point. I pointed out that your pointed desire has no bearing on the political reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kanz: I missed no point. I pointed out that your pointed desire has no bearing on the political reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanzeon</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140820</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanzeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140820</guid>
		<description>&quot;Kanzeon, you may want Edwards to back someone, but he won&#039;t, if he&#039;s smart, because he knows Obama has more in sync with him.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You sort of missed the point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I want to hear from Edwards.  If he&#039;s for Obama, that&#039;s fine.  And, no, Obama isn&#039;t more in sync, IMHO.  But we may see soon.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Kanzeon, you may want Edwards to back someone, but he won&#39;t, if he&#39;s smart, because he knows Obama has more in sync with him.&#8221;</p>
<p>You sort of missed the point.</p>
<p>I want to hear from Edwards.  If he&#39;s for Obama, that&#39;s fine.  And, no, Obama isn&#39;t more in sync, IMHO.  But we may see soon&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slamfu</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140819</link>
		<dc:creator>Slamfu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140819</guid>
		<description>Must be confusing being a far right voter trying to get your info from talk radio and FOX I imagine.    I&#039;m hoping Coulter sticks to her guns and they get a small press event watching her voting for Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must be confusing being a far right voter trying to get your info from talk radio and FOX I imagine.    I&#39;m hoping Coulter sticks to her guns and they get a small press event watching her voting for Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140818</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140818</guid>
		<description>Slamfu: Your link was to the article that began a thread on this site some time ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One-eighty, indeed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they had just continued anti-Dem statements, they&#039;d have remained consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slamfu: Your link was to the article that began a thread on this site some time ago.</p>
<p>One-eighty, indeed.</p>
<p>If they had just continued anti-Dem statements, they&#39;d have remained consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slamfu</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140817</link>
		<dc:creator>Slamfu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140817</guid>
		<description>Michael Reagan is a douchebag.   Me and some friends were taking bets on when exactly the far right wonks were going to start their 180 on McCain.  Please compare the article linked above to this one from a few weeks ago:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelReagan/2008/01/31/john_mccain_hates_me&quot;&gt;http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelReaga...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Reagan is a douchebag.   Me and some friends were taking bets on when exactly the far right wonks were going to start their 180 on McCain.  Please compare the article linked above to this one from a few weeks ago:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelReagan/2008/01/31/john_mccain_hates_me">http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelReaga&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmoetica</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140816</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmoetica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140816</guid>
		<description>Kanzeon, you may want Edwards to back someone, but he won&#039;t, if he&#039;s smart, because he knows Obama has more in sync with him. And, for 8 years Bill pissed away any chance he had to help the working class- read NAFTA and other such BS. Hillary has never said her hubby was wrong. She&#039;s far more corporate than Obama, and has far less in terms of new ideas, or change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kanzeon, you may want Edwards to back someone, but he won&#39;t, if he&#39;s smart, because he knows Obama has more in sync with him. And, for 8 years Bill pissed away any chance he had to help the working class- read NAFTA and other such BS. Hillary has never said her hubby was wrong. She&#39;s far more corporate than Obama, and has far less in terms of new ideas, or change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140815</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140815</guid>
		<description>Back on subject,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Clinton resonates with the same base of working class voters as Clinton and is more in touch with their needs than the yuppie-college-student-wealthy-independent blocs.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clinton has working class voters, indeed; her campaign (resentfully?) has disparaged the afflluent, &quot;progressive&quot; &quot;latte liberals.&quot;  Clinton is stronger among older voters.  She appeals to women though her hold is far from firm on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back on subject,</p>
<p>&#8220;Clinton resonates with the same base of working class voters as Clinton and is more in touch with their needs than the yuppie-college-student-wealthy-independent blocs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clinton has working class voters, indeed; her campaign (resentfully?) has disparaged the afflluent, &#8220;progressive&#8221; &#8220;latte liberals.&#8221;  Clinton is stronger among older voters.  She appeals to women though her hold is far from firm on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140814</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140814</guid>
		<description>As there&#039;s no new thread yet -- editors keep this in mind.  Michael Reagan is the next to go into GOP party-hack mode (I suppose we&#039;re still going to have to wait a while longer for Limbaugh), saying his dad would back McCain.  Reagan the younger was questioning McCain&#039;s fitness not so long ago on this site, don&#039;t forget.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since McCain&#039;s nomination is pretty much a done deal, the farther-right crowd has gone from a bang to a whimper insofar as comments are concerned (from totals of reader remarks on Town Hall numbering in the multiple hundreds to only a few -- Romney&#039;s endorsement of McCain has received only seven [7] remarks so far).  However, this Michael Reagan change-of-heart has already quickly gotten remark totals into the sixties.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelReagan/2008/02/14/ronald_reagan_would_back_mccain?page=full&amp;comments=true&quot;&gt;http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelReaga...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As there&#39;s no new thread yet &#8212; editors keep this in mind.  Michael Reagan is the next to go into GOP party-hack mode (I suppose we&#39;re still going to have to wait a while longer for Limbaugh), saying his dad would back McCain.  Reagan the younger was questioning McCain&#39;s fitness not so long ago on this site, don&#39;t forget.</p>
<p>Since McCain&#39;s nomination is pretty much a done deal, the farther-right crowd has gone from a bang to a whimper insofar as comments are concerned (from totals of reader remarks on Town Hall numbering in the multiple hundreds to only a few &#8212; Romney&#39;s endorsement of McCain has received only seven [7] remarks so far).  However, this Michael Reagan change-of-heart has already quickly gotten remark totals into the sixties.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelReagan/2008/02/14/ronald_reagan_would_back_mccain?page=full&#038;comments=true">http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelReaga&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanzeon</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140813</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanzeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140813</guid>
		<description>Many of Edwards&#039; supporters - for example, me - moved from Edwards to Clinton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reason I back Clinton, and Edwards should, is that Clinton resonates with the same base of working class voters as Clinton and is more in touch with their needs than the yuppie-college-student-wealthy-independent blocs.  She is marginally more progressive than Obama, but both are corporate.  Obama isn&#039;t an &quot;agent of change&quot; any more than McCain.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unlike you, however, I want Edwards to back someone, regardless of who it is.  I don&#039;t care if it suits my personal agenda.  I don&#039;t care if somehow, in the media storyline, he&#039;s &quot;missed his moment.&quot;  I want him to stand for what he believes in, as he always did, which is why I supported him in the first place and still admire him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of Edwards&#39; supporters &#8211; for example, me &#8211; moved from Edwards to Clinton.</p>
<p>The reason I back Clinton, and Edwards should, is that Clinton resonates with the same base of working class voters as Clinton and is more in touch with their needs than the yuppie-college-student-wealthy-independent blocs.  She is marginally more progressive than Obama, but both are corporate.  Obama isn&#39;t an &#8220;agent of change&#8221; any more than McCain.  </p>
<p>Unlike you, however, I want Edwards to back someone, regardless of who it is.  I don&#39;t care if it suits my personal agenda.  I don&#39;t care if somehow, in the media storyline, he&#39;s &#8220;missed his moment.&#8221;  I want him to stand for what he believes in, as he always did, which is why I supported him in the first place and still admire him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140812</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140812</guid>
		<description>VP (for Obama)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VP (for Obama)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmoetica</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140811</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmoetica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140811</guid>
		<description>After that famed NH debate moment he sided with Obama as an agent of change, if he endorsed Clinton he would totally ruin any political credibility he had. He stays quiet for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After that famed NH debate moment he sided with Obama as an agent of change, if he endorsed Clinton he would totally ruin any political credibility he had. He stays quiet for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSilver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-140810</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/17795/what-is-john-edwards-to-do/#comment-140810</guid>
		<description>It is interesting me that a brilliant candidate hasn&#039;t refined a personal criteria and collected enough data, that would make his choice clear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We each go through this process of discovering what is most important to us. For me it is campaign finance reform and engaging more moderates, independents and centrists into the political process and institutions. My question is: who will make the American government work better for the middle class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting me that a brilliant candidate hasn&#39;t refined a personal criteria and collected enough data, that would make his choice clear.</p>
<p>We each go through this process of discovering what is most important to us. For me it is campaign finance reform and engaging more moderates, independents and centrists into the political process and institutions. My question is: who will make the American government work better for the middle class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

