
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain Flip Flops on Campaign Finance Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 07:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSilver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-114857</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/#comment-114857</guid>
		<description>DLS&lt;br&gt;The justification for giving tax dollars to someone seeking public office is readily available eg Maine and Arizona.  Their elections are relatively free of special interest money.&lt;br&gt;All the public funding programs have standards to help screen out frivolous candidates.&lt;br&gt;The resistant to term limits is that people want the option to re-elect someone they like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DLS<br />The justification for giving tax dollars to someone seeking public office is readily available eg Maine and Arizona.  Their elections are relatively free of special interest money.<br />All the public funding programs have standards to help screen out frivolous candidates.<br />The resistant to term limits is that people want the option to re-elect someone they like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-114856</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/#comment-114856</guid>
		<description>I have yet to see a justification for giving tax dollars to someone seeking public office.  In addition to being able to explain why taxpayers should be forced to pay one cent for a campaign (so far, the record is winless), who would qualify?  Would Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich, who claim little of the vote and no realistic chance for election, for example?  Would anyone and everyone qualify until the first set of elections (assuming there are primary elections)?  What about individuals as opposed to parties?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thing people are missing if they dislike the PAC system that has evolved in Washington (and elsewhere) is that the people in office normally are not only seeking election, but re-election.  Incumbency is the real problem here, in other words; Americans have long known this and greatly favored term limits.  Why can&#039;t these be pursued?  If not absolute term limits, at least prohibit re-election to the same office and same kind of office in consecutive terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to see a justification for giving tax dollars to someone seeking public office.  In addition to being able to explain why taxpayers should be forced to pay one cent for a campaign (so far, the record is winless), who would qualify?  Would Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich, who claim little of the vote and no realistic chance for election, for example?  Would anyone and everyone qualify until the first set of elections (assuming there are primary elections)?  What about individuals as opposed to parties?</p>
<p>One thing people are missing if they dislike the PAC system that has evolved in Washington (and elsewhere) is that the people in office normally are not only seeking election, but re-election.  Incumbency is the real problem here, in other words; Americans have long known this and greatly favored term limits.  Why can&#39;t these be pursued?  If not absolute term limits, at least prohibit re-election to the same office and same kind of office in consecutive terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slamfu</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-114852</link>
		<dc:creator>Slamfu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/#comment-114852</guid>
		<description>Still, I&#039;m not throwing the baby out with the bathwater.  McCain is as close to a crusader as we can expect in the Senate on this issue and its a big one with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, I&#39;m not throwing the baby out with the bathwater.  McCain is as close to a crusader as we can expect in the Senate on this issue and its a big one with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSilver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-114845</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/#comment-114845</guid>
		<description>I agree that he is justified in playing by the rules of his competitors. My beef is in his turning his back on supporting the Public Finance of Elections when he has been it&#039;s champion in its successful implementation in his home State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that he is justified in playing by the rules of his competitors. My beef is in his turning his back on supporting the Public Finance of Elections when he has been it&#39;s champion in its successful implementation in his home State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slamfu</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-114843</link>
		<dc:creator>Slamfu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/17765/mccain-flip-flops-on-campaign-finance-reform/#comment-114843</guid>
		<description>Just because he doesn&#039;t hamstring himself by playing by rules his competitors wouldn&#039;t have to follow doesn&#039;t detract from that fact that he is one of the most outspoken Senators on the topic.    Its a plus in his column for me, and one on a very important issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because he doesn&#39;t hamstring himself by playing by rules his competitors wouldn&#39;t have to follow doesn&#39;t detract from that fact that he is one of the most outspoken Senators on the topic.    Its a plus in his column for me, and one on a very important issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

