An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Colin Powell Suggests He Might Vote Democrat Against Republican Nominee

colin_powell_bantustan.jpg

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell has hinted the GOP may not get his vote in the 2008 Presidential election in remarks that contained some thinly-disguised barbs aimed at President George Bush:

Former US secretary of state Colin Powell said Sunday he was weighing his options in the 2008 White House race, hinting he may cross party lines and vote against the Republican nominee.

“I will vote for the candidate I think can do the best job in America. Whether that candidate is a Republican or Democrat or an independent,” Powell told CNN’s “Late Edition.”

“Frankly, we lost a lot in recent years,” Powell added in a swipe at the administration of President George W. Bush, under whom he served as secretary of state from 2001 to 2005.

And his comments contained what some will see as even more suggestions that he is not pleased with the tenor of American foreign policy under the second George Bush:

Powell, a top general and former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said he would vote for the candidate with a vision “that starts to restore confidence in America. That starts to restore favorable ratings to America.”

“I am going to be looking for the candidate that seems to me to be leading a party that is fully in sync with the candidate and a party that will also reflect America’s goodness and America’s vision.”

At the same time, he had some nice things to say about Democratic Senator Barack Obama, but made it clear (a) he doesn’t agree with Obama on everything and (b) he’s not ready to endorse anyone (yet):

He also praised Democratic hopeful Barack Obama, who is also an African-American, and locked in a battle for the White House nomination with Hillary Clinton.

“I think he’s been an exciting person on the political stage. He has energized a lot of people in America. He has energized a lot of people around the world,” Powell told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

“And so I think he is worth listening to and seeing what he stands for.”

But Powell added he did not share all Obama’s views, nor did he completely share the views of the other candidates.

“I think every American has an obligation right now at this moment in our history to look at all the candidates and to make a judgment not simply on the basis of ideology or simply on the basis of political affiliation but on the basis of who is the best person for all of America and which party and what does that party look like?” Powell added.

Powell is the great might-have-been of American politics.

He had been a rising star in the administration of the first President George Bush, and his philosophy fit in well with that administration. Several members of the first Bush administration have expressed unhappiness with the policies of the present Bush administration, but Powell was always the good political soldier as well as the good soldier.

He had been talked about for years as a possible Presidential or Vice Presidential candidate, but his political stock fell when he defended the war in Iraq. Ironically, by all accounts Powell was marginalized and even somewhat humiliated within the present Bush administration as he fought a losing battle that pitted him against the then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney, two of the administrations most pro-active hawks.

The Swamp (which has a transcript of the CNN interview) notes:

CNN showed an interview with former Gen. Colin Powell last night in which the former secretary of state played his cards close to his chest when Wolf Blitzer asked him who he’d be supporting for president.

But based on his comments about the need for a presidential candidate who could repair America’s standing in the world, Powell at times seemed to be indicating a strong inclination towards Sen. Barack Obama.

And he also appeared to send a signal to Republicans that he wouldn’t look kindly on the party if Sen. John McCain became the nominee and many conservatives decided not to rally behind the senator from Arizona.

Why does all this matter?

To a lot of people, Powell is indicative of the independent-thinking Republican who could be a moderate or conservative but is not a lockstep supporter no matter what of the current Republican faction that now controls the Republican party and the White House. Despite a reputation diminished by his (losing) White House battles and argument that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction before the United Nations, he remains a highly appealing and credible figure to independent voters who have also shown an affinity for McCain, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and others who don’t quite fit into the “sports team” partisan mode.

If he makes it known during the campaign that he’s going to vote for a Democrat, it could be something factored in by independent voters — voters who are increasingly necessary in winning elections.

  • casualobserver
    Must be one of those "philosophy vs. policy" distinctions that comes into play respecting the Obama candidacy, because contemporaneously with this Blitzer interview, you have this from the same guy.......




    Powell cautioned Democratic presidential front-runners Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama not to fall for the easy political solution of setting timetables for withdrawal from Iraq.

    "The big issue here is at what rate can the Iraqis be responsible for assuming their own security? Remember, the purpose of the surge and the continued presence of US troops was to create an environment in which the Iraqis can surge. And that really is the thing we have to measure. How well are they surging?" he said.

    Powell said he had no idea on what basis Clinton made the promise that if she became President, she will begin to withdraw troops in sixty days, taking out one to two brigades every month.

    "... I have no idea on what basis she is making these statements. I don't know what's magic about 60 days and what's magic about one or two brigades a month. The question is, what situation do you want to leave Iraq in?" Powell said.

    Powell, however, said the Iraqis will have to assume greater responsibility for their own security over the next year or two.

    The one time Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was asked to comment on Senator Barack Obama's assertion that all of America's combat troops will be out of Iraq within 16 months of him assuming the Presidency.

    "...I have found in my many years of service, to set arbitrary dates that don't coincide with the situation on the ground or what actually is happening tends not to be a useful strategy," Powell said.

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/Powell...
  • Davebo
    To a lot of people, Powell is indicative of the independent-thinking Republican who could be a moderate or conservative but is not a lockstep supporter no matter what of the current Republican faction that now controls the Republican party and the White House.


    Which just goes to show that a lot of people are totally ignorant of his past.

    Throughout his career a lot of words could be used to describe Colin Powell, but independant thinker isn't one of them. And " lockstep supporter no matter what " is pretty hard to deny given his actual actions.

    I look forward to the day that the Powell bubble is finally burst and people see him for what he has always been.

    A consumate "yes man" who will do whatever he thinks he has to to advance himself.
  • DLS
    Powell could have been elected President in 1992, 1996, 2000, or even in 2004 or now in 2008, even.

    "Goodness" disqualfies the Democrats generally, but make no mistake about it, this was a slam against Bush and the past seven years.
  • DLS
    Obama's VP ? ? ?
  • pacatrue
    Obama's VP is intriguing indeed. Would that be a lock on the Presidency? Obama has enough support from the leftish part of the Dem party, as well as an appeal to independents and cross-over Republicans. A Powell VP would seem to cement that cross-over appeal, drawing many of the people who might vote for McCain over. But as casual observer states, there are probably too many policy differences to make that work. I'd have to hear some repudiation of Iraq statements from Powell as well myself.... Anyway, it's fun, meaningless speculation.

    I noticed the dig to McCain/Republicans in Powell's comments myself with the idea that he would want to vote for a party where the candidate and the party were "fully in sync".
  • casualobserver
    Well, hell, the fact that Bush2 let the neocons flush the "Powell doctrine" down the crapper, it hardly surprises me that he has no love lost for the Bushster.

    I can see also see Powell liking the portrait of active diplomacy foreign policy that Obama paints.

    But, ultimately, Powell is military and as I suspect Obama will ramp up the non-soldier rhetoric of withdraw according to timetables against McCain, I don't see Powell signing on.
  • DLS
    The problem that Powell might face among Obama voters is that the nuttier anti-war people probably consider him still a "Bush stooge," etc. He also may be too "heavy" or simply too establishment for Obama voters who truly want change.

    However, I bet they'd rush to accept Al Gore as Obama's Vice Presidential choice.
  • Davebo
    The problem that Powell might face among Obama voters is that the nuttier anti-war people probably consider him still a "Bush stooge," etc.


    Duh!

    Perhaps because he was a Bush Stooge for so many years, and if he's decided he will no longer be a "Bush Stooge" he's done a lousy job of conveying the message.
  • Slamfu
    What do you think his statement was doing Davebo? He basically said the Bush administration has screwed things up so bad he's looking for outside the GOP for the next commander in chief. Powell is a results driven man, and in fact has a successful gulf war under his belt from the previous Bush adminstration. I don't doubt he's been disgusted with the ineptness of this one. Remember, he resigned. You don't quit jobs you don't have a problem with.
  • fishes
    Could not be put any better. All you need to know about Powell is his performance at the UN. Talk about not wanting to be left at the station.
  • Sajwert
    I disagree with that 'Bush Stooge' comment.
    Powell did what he did not because he was a 'stooge' for anyone, but because his military training taught him that he follow the rules and the commands of his superior. That is not being a 'stooge' IMHO. He was not free to follow his own devices and desires.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC