An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Requiem for a Centrist

The Boston Globe Editorial Romney squandered a quality brand simply points out that Gov. Romney had the chops to run, and perhaps even win, as a Centrist, if only he had trusted his experience.

The Mitt Romney Massachusetts voters elected governor in 2002 was not the same person who started running for president barely halfway through his term. The Romney we once knew could have made a credible case for the presidency: a smart, data-driven, can-do executive who wouldn’t let ideology get in the way of pragmatic solutions. This pitch could have appealed to voters weary of destructive politics and hungry for progress.

It also would have had the benefit of being true.

Instead, Romney decided that he first needed to get past the doctrinaire conservatives he thought held a chokehold on the Republican primaries. He shed his pinstripes and donned a Tarzan suit, thumping his chest about immigration, gun control, morality, and religion. The new suit never quite fit, and the voters knew it.

Romney ended his presidential campaign as a venture capitalist who squandered a quality brand – his own.

It’s gratifying that neither of the two Republican candidates still in the race is the darling of the hard right, if for different reasons. John McCain, the presumptive nominee, is reviled for working with Democrats on issues such as campaign finance reform, immigration, deficit reduction, and global warming. The unexpectedly appealing Mike Huckabee is suspect because he raised taxes as governor of Arkansas and cares about “all God’s children,” including the children of illegal immigrants.

Even more than their occasional heterodoxies, however, McCain and Huckabee share that elusive character trait of authenticity. They may have tacked a few times on particular issues, but voters believe they are sincere in their convictions. So much of Romney’s shape-shifting campaign seemed insincere.

Without a foundation of core principles, it became easy to see expediency, or even hypocrisy, in Romney’s performance. When he rose indignant about New York as an “amnesty city” for illegal immigrants, it was easy for Rudy Giuliani to zing Romney about the illegals employed at his own “amnesty mansion.” When Romney attacked McCain for sponsoring limits on campaign contributions he said hurt the Republican Party, it was easy to recall how little Romney did for the state GOP; indeed, when Romney left office there were fewer Republicans in the Legislature than when he came in.

Romney framed his departure in terms of sacrifice to his party and country. “If this were only about me, I would go on,” he said. But to fight on to the Republican convention, he said, would “forestall the launch of a national campaign,” making it more likely that a Democrat could win.

It’s understandable that Romney wants to go out on a high note. But McCain swamped him in Tuesday’s primaries, and McCain’s total of four times as many delegates made it nearly impossible for Romney to catch up.

It’s one more Romney position that cannot entirely be believed.

  • StockBoySF
    The conventional wisdom in Presidential races has been, "play to your base in the primary and appeal to the moderates in the general". This is what Romney was doing but because the conservative Republican base couldn't settle on a candidate he couldn't pull ahead. The moderates pulled McCain ahead while the base was squabbling. If Romney had stuck with his past stands (instead of flip flopping around), opposed the war and opposed Bush more vigorously, I would have given him serious thought. Instead Romney ran from his past best asset- his past, and embraced the worst- Bush.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    Even though he's the guy who wanted to double Gitmo, the base wouldn't accept him.
  • DLS
    Romney was no authentic conservative, no real alternative to the Democrats. The most kind thing you could say about Romney is that he was the equivalent of a Mike Huckabee (who has worked with Democrats for years and is something of a Democrat as well as a Republican) with probably better learning, including on the economic issues. (Converting from an income to a consumption tax as Huckabee advocated is a splendid improvement and reform in this country, but it is Romney among the pair who is best known for economic knowledge and private sector experience.)
  • Slamfu
    Good riddance. Did you hear his concession speech? Basically he dropped out so that the terrorists wouldn't win. Way to plug into reality Mitt, thats why you're on your way out the door.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC