An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

What’s in an Endorsement?

Perhaps not much.

As Steve Benen put it the other day, as he has before, “there’s little evidence that endorsements actually translate to votes,” let alone to electoral success generally. Still, they don’t hurt — the good ones, anyway. The media report on them with disproportionate gravitas and, in general, they contribute to what all candidates, and especially candidates on the national stage, candidates running for the White House, need, namely, media-driven momentum derived from positive media coverage.

Consider the positive coverage John McCain received this past week, a result not just of his victory in Florida but from what followed, namely, endorsements from two high-profile political celebrities, Rudy Giuliani and Arnold Schwarzenegger. That coverage boosted his momentum, propelled him onto the front pages, and allowed him to project the image of a winner going into Super Tuesday. Mitt Romney has his endorsers, of course, particularly among the purificationist conservatives of the far right, but McCain seems to have the advantage on this front.

On the Democratic side, Hillary Clinton has her endorsers, too, including The New York Times and some high-profile figures in her own party, but it is Obama who seems, at least recently, to have attracted the big names: Ted Kennedy (and the Kennedys generally), John Kerry, MoveOn.org, etc. Indeed, as Steve shows, Obama has attracted endorsers from across the Democratic spectrum: liberals like Kennedy, Kerry, and Patrick Leahy; centrists like Tim Kaine and Kathleen Sebelius; and conservatives like Ben Nelson. He even has the support of an Eisenhower.

And now, with the California primary coming up on tomorrow on Super Tuesday — the biggest primary of all, with by far the most delegates to be won — Obama has secured the support of both the L.A. Times, the state’s biggest and most influential newspaper, and La Opinión, the biggest Spanish-language newspaper in the country, the second biggest newspaper in Los Angeles, and, needless to say, the state’s most influential Spanish-language newspaper. Given how important both California and the Hispanic vote are, these are significant endorsements.

Of course, two of the biggest prospective endorsers remain uncommitted: John Edwards and Al Gore. I suspect that Edwards will announce his endorsement after Super Tuesday. Gore, who is now above politics and who will need to work with the next president on climate issues, would be wise not to endorse anyone.

As for me, I remain uncommitted. But I feel left out. I think I’ll announce my endorsement — a Democrat, of course — either today or tomorrow. I’m still agonizing over it.

  • PaulSilver
    The less I know about a candidate the more important are endorsements. If those endorsements give me a sense of what the candidate is likely to stand for.

    Contrariwise, the more I know about a candidate the less the relevance of endorsements.
  • pacatrue
    My thoughts are the same as Paul's. The impact of endorsements depends upon the candidate. I think Obama's endorsements help, because one of the greatest problems he has to deal with is people worrying about his experience. When people with experience say Obama's okay, it can remove the worries of some people. With someone like Clinton, did the NY Times endorsement of her tell us anything about her that we did not know already?
  • G_Hendricks
    Well, actually Obama has more experience getting things done and working with people than the Hillmeister, albeit on a local level.

    And Ike, a Republican, worked hand-in-hand with a Democratic Congress, perhaps the last Prez to work hand-in-hand with the opposite party, or, as modern politicos from both sides would call 'em, the enemy. So that boosts Obama's message of bipartisanship. Also, there was a "Democrats for Ike" movement behind him nearly thirty years before Reagan. So good, good. Who does Hill have? George McGovern?
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC