America’s ‘Johnny Two Note’ Hate and Minutia Political Culture

David Fitzsimmons, The Arizona Star

Is America unstoppably careening towards hate and minutia-filled politics as it moves further into the 21st century?

It certainly seems that way. You’d think that, with all the huge issues facing the country, our politics and media coverage would be overwhelmed in a scramble to present substantive stories, serious argument-crammed think pieces, and intelligent TV coverage and policy discussions that could significantly advance a crucial national debate.

But in today’s political culture, the way to advance your new or even mainstream media career, or soil the image of another party, partisan or writer, is to be outrageous, over the top, searing, sarcastic or indignant. Or you create an issue by seizing on something small, then blow it up like a political blimp until it becomes a narrative with “legs” that others will jump on, even if it’s a non or fabricated issue. The name of the game is getting attention. Who cares how?

All of this has now become so ingrained in our political culture that it brings to mind the title of a Rodgers and Hart song from the 1937 musical “Babes in Arms,” called “Johnny One Note.” Its opening words: “Johnny could only sing one note and the note he sings was this: Ah!”

Our politics increasingly seems to be mired in two sour notes: the predominance of hate and anger as a political motivational and discussion tool, and the seizing of small events or issues which are then dissected, and peppered with generous dashes of paranoia and hatred. Speculation is packaged as fact or probability when they are often neither. The synthetic event or issue then takes on a life of its own as others want to cover what others have covered — because others are covering it. Our politics is therefore increasingly easy to manipulate, and our media oftentimes not gatekeepers but partisan rant and negative image-dissemination systems.

A telling moment in our politics came when Bay Buchanan, conservative columnist Pat Buchanan’s assertive, articulate and often-vitriolic sister, and a key media spokesperson for Mitt Romney during the GOP’s failed presidential campaign, proclaimed that she’s fed up with politics — and is going into real estate. Buchanan was the quintessential TV partisan talking head when she was on the tube; always in a race against time to load answers with as many talking points as humanly possible, and present them with angry, quotable zingers aimed at Democrats and Barack Obama.

The Washington Post notes that after Romney’s loss she went for her real estate license. She then said something to the Washington Examiner explaining why she quit being a TV partisan talking head that speaks volumes about our political culture: “I can’t just live my life going on TV and being angry all the time.”

Who said politics has to always be in an angry tone? But TV in particular needs conflict and emotion. How many times have you seen two partisans angrily going at it on a show, interrupting each other and screaming, then the host says with a smug look: “We’ll have to have you back!!”

Meanwhile, a prime example of seizing on minutia and inflating it into a fake controversy until the attention deficit media jumps on it was best seen when Barack Obama mentioned he does skeet shooting. He must be lying, the partisan chorus howled. Then the mainstream media covered it. So Obama released a photo showing him skeet shooting. Partisan bloggers then dissected and questioned the photo. Is the smoke real? Is that really Obama? When was it taken? No way he could wear several changes of clothes in one day. Some conservatives call it — I’m not kidding, now — “Skeetgate.”

Actually, it’s “Hackgate” for those seriously investigating it, or for those wasting a Presidential press briefing demanding more answers on this “issue.” Many blame Obama for mentioning skeet shooting: hey, he said something, didn’t he, so didn’t he expect to be CHALLENGED?

Advice to Barack Obama: Never in an interview ever say you wear underwear.

Copyright 2013 Joe Gandelman. This weekly column is distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.

LEGAL NOTICE ON CARTOON: This copyrighted cartoon is licensed to run on TMV. Reproduction elsewhere without licensing is strictly prohibited. See great cartoons by all the top political cartoonists at http://cagle.com. To license this cartoon for your own site, visit http://politicalcartoons.com

Auf Stumbleupon zeigen
Auf tumblr zeigen

  • clarkma5

    The way minutia takes on a life of its own is through projection. “Obama said something, that must mean that ALL OUR LIBERTIES ARE UNDER ATTACK”. Or “Boehner did this…THAT MUST MEAN THE GOP ARE HELLBENT ON DELIVERING OUR COUNTRY TO LARGE CORPORATIONS”. Uhhh, what happens when you take events at face value? You end up looking at something closer to the truth, and you don’t need to make small events big because big events are big. But that requires the politicians, the media, and the population at large to have enough sense to know what they’re afraid of and to sidestep it in their search for the truth. I’m not sure that’s really within the grasp of humanity at large, there’s always going to be too many people who are emotionally underdeveloped in that sense (or if they aren’t, are too morally low to not prey on the weaknesses of others).

    The fourth estate really has the responsibility to take the high road, if I’m going to put blame for this anywhere, which they’ve failed at miserably in the search for ease, profits, and comfort. Selfishness begets fear begets misery begets chaos.

  • bigpartymaker

    Thanks for writing this piece. I’m 35 years old and only became engaged in politics in the last 5 or so years (I guess I have Bush to thank). It’s already getting tiring to me because of the ignorance and lack of civil discussion. I had wondered if it was always like this and I’m only paying attention now.

  • Enkindle

    Finally! Voices of reason begin to surface, but I fear only to be fished out, skinned, gutted, buttered and seared to feed the insatiable hunger of political hackers and hacketts salivating upon their keyboards in anticipation.