An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

AT&T to Serve Democratic Convention Goers

From the Rocky Mountain News:
The Democratic National Convention Committee named AT&T this morning as the official wireless service provider for the party’s convention in August.

AT&T’s agreement with the DNCC will require it to provide smart devices, hardware, software and air cards that allow direct connection to the Internet.

The deal comes a couple of weeks after Denver-based Qwest was named by the DNCC as the official telecommunications provider for the convention.

Stupid question alert: why can’t the official telecommunications provider also provide the official wireless service? AT&T is a telecommunications provider too, yes?

Not as stupid question alert: What I want to know is, how much is AT&T getting for the service they’re providing and will information about the communications that occur during the August 25-28 event, or the communications themselves that are passed between all the attendees be information that the U.S. government might at sometime want AT&T to hand over?

What rules for privacy will prevail?

  • shaun
    Jill:

    Good questions all, and it is somehow fitting that the Dems chose AT&T, which has a hard-earned reputation for lousy service, including frequent Internet service outages and its fawning willingness to let the NSA and other federal agencies spy on its customers.
  • I've become so cynical. Imagine how Watergate was bungled - and now, it almost seems as though it would be SIMPLE to do what they wanted - almost part of the course of business with a little well-placed tech. Sigh - I have definitely been sitting in front of my computer too long.
  • jdledell
    Quest was the only major telecommunications company to turn down the Bush Admin for Illegal telephone intercepts without a FISA warrant. I'm glad to see the DNC reward Quest with at least a portion of the deal. Nonetheless, if I were a DNC leader I would NOT have rewarded AT&T, the major offender, with anything. As is true in the Senate, it seems there are enough Democrats willing to let bygones be bygones, or maybe waiting for a Democratic President so they can do their own illegal spying.
  • Jdledell - thanks for that reminder - I remember that now.

    Okay - another question - though I haven't thought it through re: if it's really relevant: AT&T stock ownership and the DNCC folks. Does that matter at all? Do we care? Should we? Is that just not realistic to worry about?

    Although the $ aspect concerns far less than the privacy issue.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC