<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dem Debate: Making love to the real-time reaction meter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:04:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-120462</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/tv-news/cnn/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/#comment-120462</guid>
		<description>And I realize that every GOP debate, to date, has been a yawner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I realize that every GOP debate, to date, has been a yawner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-120461</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/tv-news/cnn/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/#comment-120461</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be surprised if Clinton News Network&#039;s reaction meter had bias in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t be surprised if Clinton News Network&#39;s reaction meter had bias in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-120457</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/tv-news/cnn/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/#comment-120457</guid>
		<description>It was a yawner.  As to the &quot;dream team,&quot; well, you&#039;re all better late than never, I suppose.  Some of us (ahem) were mentioning this possibility during the 2004 Dem convention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a yawner.  As to the &#8220;dream team,&#8221; well, you&#39;re all better late than never, I suppose.  Some of us (ahem) were mentioning this possibility during the 2004 Dem convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillmz</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-120453</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillmz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/tv-news/cnn/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/#comment-120453</guid>
		<description>Taking the civility into these comments: I agree with everyone. :)  And frankly, I feel I can actually say and write that they make me proud of our system.  Until the next negative ad anyway.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kudos to them both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking the civility into these comments: I agree with everyone. <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   And frankly, I feel I can actually say and write that they make me proud of our system.  Until the next negative ad anyway.</p>
<p>Kudos to them both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-120452</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/tv-news/cnn/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/#comment-120452</guid>
		<description>Great debate and Obama and Hillary certainly did agree before going into the debate that they would be cordial and pleasant towards each other.  After the debate Obama even held Hillary&#039;s chair as she was getting up.  There were times on the stage when it seemed as though they were best buds, that they were a team.  But there were some digs taken, too.  But even those were done civilly.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And yes, the debate was so much better than the Republicans.  There was more applause in this debate than any other.  It was almost as if the audience liked both candidates.  It was almost as though the crowd liked both candidate and there was no large block of Hillary supporters and no large block of Obama supporters.  For the most part the audience seemed as though they would have been happy with either as President.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as the dream ticket- I have thought about that over the months and have dismissed it.  But there was one moment in tonight&#039;s debate where it seemed possible.  At the end, when the O/C (or C/O) ticket was broached, I thought it was interesting that neither really answered the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great debate and Obama and Hillary certainly did agree before going into the debate that they would be cordial and pleasant towards each other.  After the debate Obama even held Hillary&#39;s chair as she was getting up.  There were times on the stage when it seemed as though they were best buds, that they were a team.  But there were some digs taken, too.  But even those were done civilly.  </p>
<p>And yes, the debate was so much better than the Republicans.  There was more applause in this debate than any other.  It was almost as if the audience liked both candidates.  It was almost as though the crowd liked both candidate and there was no large block of Hillary supporters and no large block of Obama supporters.  For the most part the audience seemed as though they would have been happy with either as President.</p>
<p>As far as the dream ticket- I have thought about that over the months and have dismissed it.  But there was one moment in tonight&#39;s debate where it seemed possible.  At the end, when the O/C (or C/O) ticket was broached, I thought it was interesting that neither really answered the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barack Obama &#187; Dem Debate: Making love to the real-time reaction meter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-110370</link>
		<dc:creator>Barack Obama &#187; Dem Debate: Making love to the real-time reaction meter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/tv-news/cnn/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/#comment-110370</guid>
		<description>[...] Jill Miller Zimon wrote an interesting post today on Dem Debate: Making love to the real-time reaction meterHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt-Hillary was “Senator Clinton” while Barack was “Barack” much of the evening - some of the co-bloggers I blogged with didn’t like that and thought it wasn’t respectful of HRC to not call Barack “Senator Obama.” &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jill Miller Zimon wrote an interesting post today on Dem Debate: Making love to the real-time reaction meterHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt-Hillary was “Senator Clinton” while Barack was “Barack” much of the evening &#8211; some of the co-bloggers I blogged with didn’t like that and thought it wasn’t respectful of HRC to not call Barack “Senator Obama.” &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T_Steel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-120448</link>
		<dc:creator>T_Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/tv-news/cnn/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/#comment-120448</guid>
		<description>I thought the debate was a draw.  Both were on point.  The whole &quot;Senator Obama is all talk&quot; should quite down some (he came off like the cool college professor to me).  Senator Clinton seemed relaxed and was solid.  The both were very respectful and classy.  Much better than the Republican Debate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I LOVED THAT THEY STAYED ON THE ISSUES!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the debate was a draw.  Both were on point.  The whole &#8220;Senator Obama is all talk&#8221; should quite down some (he came off like the cool college professor to me).  Senator Clinton seemed relaxed and was solid.  The both were very respectful and classy.  Much better than the Republican Debate.</p>
<p>I LOVED THAT THEY STAYED ON THE ISSUES!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSilver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-120444</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/tv-news/cnn/17477/dem-debate-making-love-to-the-real-time-reaction-meter/#comment-120444</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it be interesting for Clinton to pick Obama as a running mate and then appoint him to the Supreme Court with the next opening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#39;t it be interesting for Clinton to pick Obama as a running mate and then appoint him to the Supreme Court with the next opening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
