An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Republican Hardliners Not Happy About McCain’s Florida Win

Here in Florida, Hillary and McCain carried the day. Giuliani apparently is planning to drop out of the race and give the nod to McCain. And some conservatives ain’t happy, to put it mildly. 

At The Corner, Michael Graham says, "Assuming there is no shocking revelation or health issue, the GOP nomination is over. Conservatives need to start practicing the phrase
"Nominee presumptive John McCa….." Sorry, I can’t say it. Not yet….. So it is over. Finished. In November, we’ll be sending out our most liberal, least trustworthy candidate vs. to take on Hillary Clinton—perhaps not more liberal than Barack Obama, but certainly far less trustworthy." Hey, cheer up, Michael Graham: Obama might still get the nomination!

Kathryn Jean Lopez, whose love for Romney is legendary, is keeping the faith alive. “I’ll shut up after this post, but Romney has been ON since Michigan. It may prove — it may have been proven tonight — to be too late. But this guy speaking right now, is hitting important issues, making you feel good about America, as you should. It’s a rallying speech. Maybe it’s the silly flip-flopping thing that has been too hard to shake. Maybe he took too long to rise above it.”

Maybe. Podhoretz pooh-poohs "the ridiculous early analysis." "Mitt Romney has no reason to back off, even though he will have lost four of the five real contests so far. He’s worked successfully now to establish himself as the McCain alternative, and there appears to be enough anger and suspicion of McCain among Republicans to make a Romney win plausible if McCain does something to injure himself." He does foresee "increasingly agitated conservative rage radiating toward him from the radio speakers and a browser near you." I expect McCain—-if his momentum continues, which I’d say is far from a foregone conclusion—will survive. He’s been the target of it so often.

I don’t expect these particular Republicans to take this in, but McCain’s success indicates that moderate Republicans and right-tilting independents might be as sick as Democrats over where their party’s hard right turn has taken them. Maybe a lot of people who consider themselves “conservative” would like a return to a more moderate sort of Republican party and a more moderate sort of Republican: a Gerald Ford sort of Republican, say—or a a George Romney sort. The reasoning sort of Republican we used to have, in other words, rather than the unreasoning sort that the politics of the last few years has tended to foster, the sort who puts the party (and political power) before principle and who allows reality to act as a check on policy.

I laugh out loud when people call McCain “liberal:; I firmly expect that a McCain presidency would in many respects represent a continuation of many of the policies now in place which I oppose. But there’s no doubt that McCain represents a type of Republican who will put principle before the party line—which is why conservatives regard him as untrustworthy. But—given the Bush Administration’s failures–you’d think they’d be looking for a new type of Republican to lead their party. Isn’t it meant to be a sign of insanity to keep on doing the same thing once you’ve seen it doesn’t work?

  • Well, you're right about one thing, D. He's certainly more conservative than he is liberal. However, he does hold some rather liberal positions on key issues, not the least of which is immigration. I also think it's interesting that the ultra-liberal New York Times has endorsed the man. Another interesting observation is the fact that both moderate and liberal Republicans, as well as independents are largely supporting him. Personally, I would classify him as a moderate with strong neocon (only without the neo) tendencies. He's no classical conservative for sure, but then, none of the Republican front runners are. All of them have some holes in their "conservative" armor. As a conservative myself, I say we throw 'em back and toss out another line. Anyway, the fact that he's come down on the wrong side of some big issues (conservatively speaking) a few too many times is a red flag for any die hard wingnut. Unless you''re a Kool-Aid drinker, I think at the end of the day you cast your vote for the candidate who pisses you off the least and then hope for the best.
  • Rudi
    For all the talk of a "conservative base", there seems to be a trend in Florida and the West from the party elite.

    The West now has a streak of libertarianism. After Barry Goldwater retired he became more libertarian himself.

    Governor Crist is now making himself in the mold of Mitten's father(Geogre Romney) and Georges successor the Liberal Bill Milliken. At this time the pro-environmental and anti-Schiavo(Jeb Bush) is more popular than either Bush in Florida.

    Maybe Mitten's should have ran as his fathers son instead of pandering to the "conservative base". Bill Milliken endorsed McClown over Mitten's.
  • DLS
    It's not just "hard-liners" but many others. He's often behaved as a Dem and as a liberal rather than as a conservative -- which means he offers no alternative to the tired and oft-tiring Dems. Moreover, some of his "maverick" behavior just draws attention to himself. It's about him, not about principle or "standing up to" the GOP leadership.

    More libertarianism and less government in Washington is long overdue and would be most welcome!
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC