An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Rebranding The Left

In Haaretz, Rami Livni notes an unusual change that is beginning to develop amongst the Israeli left:

The traditional peace-camp solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – two nations, two states – has fallen out of favor, and its supporters’ ranks have dwindled. Instead, other voices have been advocating, with increasing confidence, a single bi-national state.

The one-state advocates still don’t have a joint program or political front, but the balance within the left is changing. The peace organizations’ conference in Madrid exploded last month after radical leftist activists refused to sit in the same hall with Peace Now representatives, claiming they were “an arm of the occupation.” They drafted a document focusing on the one-state principle.

The drift toward one state is obvious in the Arab leadership in Israel. The Arab legal organization Adalah has recently revoked its traditional stand and called for the creation of a single constitutional state between the Jordan and the sea. Even Hadash [a left-wing party with 3 legislators in the Knesset] is drawing away de facto from the two-state idea. It is not advocating one state, but it has tucked away what until recently used to be its historical banner.

Livni goes on to note that while one-state advocates are still in the minority, they’re increasingly influential. In significant ways, he points out, “they are affecting the left-wing’s discourse, re-demarcating the borders of what is ‘just’ and ‘moral’ and damaging the sense of justice and inner conviction of a wider left-wing circle.”

While a growing one-state movement is an interesting observation, it’s a stretch to take a few examples and argue that their ideas are starting to catch on in Israeli political discourse. If there’s one thing that the majority of both Israeli liberals and conservatives agree upon, it’s the necessity of maintaining the Jewish nature of their state — a reality that has been constant since the country’s founding. If one-state advocates are ever to have their views take hold, it will still be a long time in the coming.

(hat tip: E-man)

  • You wrote: "to think that this idea is starting to catch on in a meaningful way in Israeli political discourse is a tremendous stretch. If there’s one thing that the majority of both Israeli liberals and conservatives agree upon, it’s the necessity of maintaining the Jewish nature of their state — a reality that has been constant since the country’s founding. To believe that a transformation towards a one-state consensus is suddenly in the offing involves either a major suspension of reason or a distorted view of history. If one-state advocates are ever to have their views take hold, it will be a long time in the coming."

    Why? Why do you think this is a "tremendous stretch"? As an American Jew, I think about this option as being possibly the only option for any people who want to consider themselves members of a democracy.

    Please, cite where it is you've learned that "the majority of both Israeli liberals and conservatives agree upon, it’s the necessity of maintaining the Jewish nature of their state — a reality that has been constant since the country’s founding."

    You are saying that the change Livni notes isn't actually happening. I'd love to know what Livni's even anecdotal evidence is for this assertion, but also - what is yours?

    Thanks.
  • DLS
    Actually, if the Arabs behaved themselves, plenty of us who aren't flaming lefties have ideas that would appeal to both Arabs and Jews there, which includes such a bi-national state, which even addresses the so-called "right of return" (by the original residents, obviously, not their descendants and other family members) and the settlements at the same time; the example I gave was the Kooch Behar enclave system.

    http://strangemaps.files.wordpress.com/2007/05/...

    https://home.medewerker.uva.nl/h.w.vanschendel/...
  • DLS
    More -- on Israel and the Territories. Enjoy.

    http://www.empax.org/files/SwissCheeseMap.pdf
  • Thanks, DLS. I agree with you re: there being plenty of non-flaming lefties with ideas that would appeal to both Arabs and Jews. The van Schendel piece is very long but I did read the Swiss Cheese Map piece - fascinating. I love takes like that - very anthropological really. Thank you for the link.
  • DLS
    The Territories invoke quite a metaphor when you see the shape of them -- the West Bank is resembles an embryo and the tricky part is to create at least an umbilical cord (transit corridor) between it and Gaza.
  • Holly_in_Cincinnati
    This is just another attempt to destroy the State of Israel.
  • Oh my - and people tell me I overthink! But...you are right - though I'd say the West Bank would be like an embryo about to split into twins since it's kind of elongated.
  • DLS
    Holly, presumably you were talking about the real "single-state" people. I was on record here implicitly and have been explicit in other threads that this is impossible to achieve in reality because the Arabs will NOT behave themselves. (In fact, they'll see such a thing as additional incrementalist "progress" toward Israel's destruction, just as they would see any retreat to the Green Line as such.)
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC