An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

The Story of the George Bush Presidency: Unstable, Unfinished & Uncomprehending

01asouspeech.jpg

Hard to believe, but I still can muster a modicum of sympathy for George Walker Bush. This is because it is apparent after the last seven long years that this son of the Texas oil patch really didn’t know what hit him, still doesn’t know what hit him and still won’t know what hit him when he heads home one year hence to his ranch to search among the scrub brush for his squandered legacy.

This is not to say he can be forgiven for his innumerable excesses, but that deer-in-the-headlights look we saw again last night as he give his final (Praise the Lord!) State of the Union speech was a reminder that seldom has a president been so utterly overmatched, and certainly no one comes close in modern times.

The speech, delivered on the eve of the Florida primary by a man whose hair seems to turn grayer by the day, was overshadowed by developments in the race to choose his successor, chief among them the official rollout of “Camelot 2008.” But for those watching and listening, the speech could have been titled “Unstable, Unfinished and Uncomprehending.”

Unstable as in the economy and his predictable solution of throwing money at Americans but not identifying, let alone addressing, the underlying institutional problems.

Unfinished
as in the Iraq war and his predictable refusal to set a troop withdrawal timetable, which gives Prime Minister Al-Maliki even less incentive to build on the transitory successes of the Surge.

Uncomprehending
as in his predictable cluelessness regarding the serial failures of his administration, including its abject divisivness, a central theme of the Democratic response delivered by Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius.

More here on the SOTU address.

Meanwhile, I’ll leave you with a most damning bill of particulars — excerpts from Bush’s acceptance speech at the 2000 Republican National Convention. When one takes into consideration all that has happened — and should have happened but did not — since then the disconnect between image and reality is mind boggling:

“America’s armed forces need better equipment, better training and better pay . . . A generation shaped by Vietnam must remember the lessons of Vietnam: When America uses force in the world, the cause must be just, the goal must be clear, and the victory must be overwhelming . . . I don’t have enemies to fight. I have no stake in the bitter arguments of the last few years. I want to change the tone of Washington to one of civility and respect . . . We’re learning to protect the natural world around us. We will continue this progress, and we will not turn back … to lead this nation to a responsibility era, that president himself must be responsible. So when I put my hand on the Bible, I will swear to uphold the laws of our land . . . I will not attack a part of this country because I want to lead the whole of it.”

Photograph by Mark Wilson/Getty Images

  • superdestroyer
    I wonder when the Republican party will be so irrelevant that the meida will not fell compelled to broadcast some sort of Republican Party response. My guess is that it could be as early as 2013.
  • Don Quijote
    Hard to believe, but I still can muster a modicum of sympathy for George Walker Bush.

    I have none.

    I hope the man can't show his face in public once he leaves office and spends the rest of his short miserable life drowning his sorrows in a bottle of Jim Beam.


    I wonder when the Republican party will be so irrelevant that the meida will not fell compelled to broadcast some sort of Republican Party response.

    Never!!!

    The Republican Party like the Media is owned lock, stock and barrel by corporate America. How else do you explain the fact GWB got elected twice, or that Kerry (a war hero with a chestful of medals) was so successfully swift-boated (on behalf of a coked up awol air national guard who never got close to combat)?
  • superdestroyer
    Senator Kerry was a hack politicians who had issues in his own past that made running as a veteran an iffy proposition. He should have run on the issues but even in this election, that appears to be something that Democrats just do not want to do. In Democrats in 2004 faced the same problems that the Republicans are facing in 2008, not any of the candidates running for office appeared fit to be president.

    When the Republicans have less than 40% of the seats in both houses and have lost the presidential election in a rout, there is no reason for the media to give a minority party a chance at a rebuttal.

    Have Kerry run as a war hero is sort of like having a black Chicago machine politician as someone who is capable of building consensus and develop bipartisanship.

    All the Democrats really did to do is talk about the incompetence of the Republicans and how the Republicans do not really believe any of their policy proposals and the Democrats should win easily.
  • Don Quijote
    Senator Kerry was a hack politicians who had issues in his own past that made running as a veteran an iffy proposition.

    A Bronze Star, a Silver Star and three Purple Hearts.

    On his worst day, drunk and stoned out of his mind Kerry has more good sense in the tip of his little finger than GWB has ever had , and that is true for pretty much any elected politician, and doubly true for Democrats, and that ain't saying much.

    Issues, who cares?
    In 2004 the only thing that mattered was getting rid of GWB.
    In 2008, the only thing that matters is getting rid of GWB and of his enablers.

    If McCain is the Republican candidate, watch him run on his war hero status.
  • mw
    "as he give his eighth and (Praise the Lord!) last State of the Union speech" -sm


    Sentence should be corrected to "...as he gave his seventh and probably (Praise the Lord!) last State of the Union speech"

    He took office in 2001, and there Constitution does not mandate an annual "State of The Union" but leaves it to the executive to determine timing. GWB probably will not, but could give his eighth SOTU later in the year if he so chooses. Unlikely but it has happened before.
  • shaun
    DWSUWF:

    I made the same error last year. Fix made. Thank you.
  • DLS
    Not sympathy, but regret. Even you can't expect to keep bashing Bush for everything bad, real or imaginary, after he has left and retired to Crawford!
  • Anna
    As I read Shaun's post, it did make me stop & think that beyond all of the partisan bickering, Bush is human being (the jury's still out on Cheney ;-) ). I wonder if, even if it's only occasionally, Bush deeply wishes that the Supreme Court had pronounced Gore the winner back in 2000 and he could've gone on his own happy-go-lucky way. I won't say I'll miss Bush when he's gone, but I don't wish anything bad for the man behind the presidential mask.
  • shaun
    Anna:

    I think you are onto something. Bush had never had to work hard in his life before being elected. Virtually everything was handed to him on a silver platter and Poppy was always around the keep him out of Vietnam or call a tow truck when he drove another business into a ditch.

    I do believe he may secretly wish the 2000 election was never stolen.
  • DLS
    The Democrats tried and failed to steal what they lost, the White House, in 2000. You stand corrected.

    Keep up the faith, however. Already, reminescent of that aimed-at-bottom-IQ Dem "conference call" during the theft attempt, the Clinton gang is couching their desires to change the rules about delegates to the convention in their favor, in nice touchy-feely terms, and it wouldn't be surprising if they attempted a junk lawsuit to force the delegates to be able to join the convention. You may yet get to see Dims cheat and win.
  • Slamfu
    "Even you can't expect to keep bashing Bush for everything bad, real or imaginary, after he has left and retired to Crawford!"

    Lol, cause republicans would never try to pin the blame for screwups on the previous president.

    We got exactly what we elected. Bush was a corporate exec who ran companies into the ground and let someone else pick up the pieces after cashing out. So we put him in the most important Chief Executive position in the world and he did the same thing. Big surprise.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC