All Teachers Should Pack Heat

On 12/27/12 I posted on TMV to discuss in part the issue of gun control – and so have many other TMV writers since 12/14/12 when someone shot some very young kids and teachers at a Connecticut grade school. Most of our nation’s 24/7 info-entertainment Media outlets obsessed on this subject for weeks and articles were written and published by every well-known and unknown commentator, pundit, blogger, writer and opinionator. Now a month later, the pervasive indifference resumes. How many people in the U.S. outside those directly affected even remember (or care) what happened?

So much has transpired in the U.S. and around the world since that day. Republican lunatics in the U.S. House of Representatives are threatening general Federal Default and government shutdown for March. It might be plausible and understandable to simply push gun control to the far recesses of our ADHD minds – or completely forget those debates as the National Rifle Association (NRA) would prefer.

Before anyone starts to claim I’m the cold, heartless, sociopathic one on TMV, I’m none of those things if you have read even a handful of my posts since I started part-time blogging in early 2009. However our national dialog has become so partisan, shallow, moronic and nasty that the best way to silence any discussion of any subject is to falsely and personally attack a participant with whom you disagree. Beside, facts and reality no longer matter in 21st Century America – only base emotional responses are encouraged within a completely diversionary and superficial entertainment context. It makes blogging so much easier and fun when facts and reality are no longer needed to voice opinions.

Too many Americans have degenerated to a state of perpetual amnesia and willful ignorance. I am more accurately described as a negative realist who is a mere observer and commentator of the rapid economic, political, social and environmental decline of this nation and entire planet. If my TMV rants upset you, then I’m pleased. I don’t like idiot “ditto-heads” anyway.

Many conservative zealots and Republican reactionaries do not view any government jobs as “real” unless the “job” entails a person packing heat (carrying or using a gun). Over the past few decades of cutting government programs at all levels, Republicans rarely cut those in the Military or Police – and the essential part of these publicly-funded jobs is to ensure law & order and impose centralized political and social will by means of threats of physical harm or punishment, or by using guns and other fun weapons to subdue criminals, terrorists, dissenters, and citizens.

The U.S. has the largest prison population in the world – per capita and by sheer numbers – compared to all other nations on the earth. We have the largest military on the globe with annual spending that exceeds the collective total of all other nations on the globe. Half of all the world’s private weapons and guns are found in the U.S. If an American is not enamored with power, guns, violence and war, he or she is probably an outlier and may be considered by some in our vast national security complex as a suspected “terrorist.” (This is a perfectly plausible yet peversely convoluted form of analysis that is pervasive in our society today.)

There have been some worthwhile proposals to limit access to guns by expanding and enhancing existing technology/biometrics to those people who have passed periodic licensing requirements so only certain guns could be fired by authorized individuals. (This one came from my old TMV nemesis Elijah Sweete.) Other proposals would heavily tax bullets and ammunition to ensure there would be fewer bystander murders when there are shootouts. Less enforceable ideas would limit the sales of certain weapons due to their particular attributes or to expand any national background checks and close existing “gun show loopholes” to actually weed out sociopathic gun nuts.

The nation is still highly polarized and divided over the possible need for and format of any gun control. The psychopathic NRA principally represents gun manufacturers and individual gun nuts across the U.S. It will ensure no gun control legislation will ever pass Congress – no matter how many Sandy Hook massacres occur in the future. All the periodic massacres and calls for gun control legislation merely increase gun sales – which in a perverse sense increases economic activity. It is important to note that new 3-D printers can now create working handguns in many types of metals (without any serial numbers or background checks) for use by any deranged person. So let’s move onto things that we can actually change instead.

I thought the original NRA plan to have armed security officers at every school could have been a good national economic stimulus proposal. If the Federal government would hire and train millions of new security officers to patrol schools, universities, shopping malls, public buildings, sports venues, and places of worship, we would have a new national jobs program. It doesn’t matter if people are just digging up things, building infrastructure, flipping hamburgers, watching porn on computers, marching around to Sousa music, or walking around public venues squinting seriously while packing heat, they would spend their paychecks and expand the economy in various ways so we could make some serious efforts to escape this long and persistent deep recession.

But no, some commentators to my prior post and politicians around the nation are simply too cheap. They want to “protect” us for free – or on the cheap by not spending much at all. The most popular proposals now advocate using existing teachers by having them (and school janitors, nurses and cafeteria personnel) carry weapons – since they are already on the premises and are being paid to “teach.” Naturally, most “bleeding heart liberal” teachers and educators objected – as if they didn’t have enough to do during the school day – than to assume the new and unpaid duties of security officers. But they were short-sighted and they cannot see the “big guns” from the huge piles of little ones.

The largest single expense for most all state and local governments is for public education. And over the past few decades – where have most of the reductions in public spending have occurred following endless tax cuts to further enrich our financial sector? Yes, in public education. This is for a variety of reasons but two stand out: 1.) Many older whites who constitute a large part of the electorate simply don’t care to pay taxes to educate a bunch of useless non-white children and kids of illegal aliens. 2.) We’re essentially cheap as a society when it comes to everything that is really important – i.e. paying for environmental protection, infrastructure maintenance, and education.

A slight majority in our society prefers to collectively waste billions of dollars encouraging fraudulent financial schemes and bank bailouts, and endless foreign wars and bloated defense spending. Individually we prefer to waste money on junk food and every new personal technological gadget that distracts us from relating to our fellow human beings and reality in general. In either case, too many of us really don’t value human life or the long-term viability of humanity on a planet with an environment we are negatively and rapidly influencing to our detriment.

But if teachers were considered essential parts of our beloved defense and national security industries, then they would be held in greater esteem in our society and they would have far greater job security. If it takes arming all teachers to stop cuts in funding for public education, then that would be a policy all teachers should embrace. They might even get tax deductions or credits (or direct financial assistance) to purchase guns and bullets, and get trained on how to use them. Teachers certainly constitute a group that is well acclimated to extensive background checks and periodic licensing requirements.

Perhaps if we changed their titles from “teachers” or “professors” to pre-ROTC “commandants” or “security officers” they would endear themselves to the far right ideologues that still dominate our public discourse and education policy initiatives. Is it not better to have well-trained salaried persons who will use guns only as a last resort in our schools than having a bunch of “itchy-finger” unpaid volunteer “gun nuts” protecting children? They should occasionally and randomly offer up some “problem” students to the NSA, FBI, local police and Homeland Security to ensure they are viewed as part of our Defense apparatus and to protect their overall job security before more public spending is slashed.

If education cuts persist and teachers continue to be laid off due to extreme right-wing ideology that no longer values public education in a nation ruled by a corrupt, greedy and sociopathic oligarchy, then at least teachers would already be trained in a number of viable alternative career paths for the 21st century that involve the use of guns – the only places where significant increases in Federal and state spending have occurred over the past decade. Not only could some former teachers serve the wealthy as bodyguards but they could also simultaneously serve as nannies and in-house teachers for their lucky spoiled children who will inherit most of the globe’s wealth over the next few decades. Better to suck up to the owners than starve to death. (I’ve been stupid in my life to not realize this, so that’s why I’m in the outhouse.)

I am surprised by the reactions of some TMV readers and contributors, and by many people I meet, that I’m not serious and I’m just arguing ad absurdum. In this surreal 21st century we now inhabit – devoid of most reality and based principally on subjective emotional thoughts – such offbeat proposals (aka “bat-sh*t crazy ones) are the only ones worthy of consideration and any possibility of widespread adoption.

If you can’t beat them – join them.

Submitted on Monday, January 14, 2013 by Marc Pascal, ranting happily from sunny but cold (under 50 degrees Fahrenheit) Phoenix, Arizona. I’ve got a front-row seat to all the lunacy and insanity that accompanies the final years of a global empire – and I’m loving every minute of thie view from outside the Matrix.

Auf Stumbleupon zeigen
Auf tumblr zeigen

Author: MARC PASCAL

Marc Pascal is an private enterprise counselor and independent arbitrator and mediator in Phoenix, AZ.

  • sheknows

    Well this might have to change the curriculum to even become a teacher. So many credit hrs. of target shooting and weapon assembly. Perhaps they could offer a minor in Assault Techniques w/Hand to Hand combat.

    It’s a Brave New World…

  • The_Ohioan

    Besides, they’d have to form a new teachers union and unions are passe right now.

    “Guns have no place in our schools. Period. We must do everything we can to reduce the possibility of any gunfire in schools, and concentrate on ways to keep all guns off school property and ensure the safety of children and school employees.”

    http://www.nea.org/home/53943.htm

  • http://www.elijahssweetespot.com ELIJAH SWEETE

    Nemesis? Really?

    Remember the words of Marie Antionette, “Be careful who you nemesize.”

  • ordinarysparrow

    I am so thankful my teachers were not equipped with guns during the teenage years…

    Am not at all sure that equipping teachers with guns is the way to end violence towards children…

  • DORIAN DE WIND, Military Affairs Columnist

    Most Americans support tough new measures to combat gun violence, including a ban on assault weapons and posting armed guards at every school, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

    More than half of all Americans — 52 percent in the new poll — say the Newtown shootings made them more supportive of gun control; just 5 percent say they are now less apt to back tighter restrictions. Most also are at least somewhat worried about a mass shooting in their own community, with concern jumping to 65 percent among those with school-age children at home.

    The findings, which also show broad bipartisan support for requiring mandatory background checks for buyers at gun shows, come as President Obama said Monday he will lay out specific White House proposals on gun control legislation and executive actions this week.

    Read more here

  • http://wideeyedandreal.blogspot.com ProfElwood

    Actually, what most people called for was allowing school workers to carry, not mandating. Essentially, there’s a call to reverse the “gun free zone”, which might, in reality, still be gun free, just not advertised as such.

    Also, Not all people who are against the current crop of proposals are against ALL proposals. Libertarians, in particular, are also quite dovish, and have been calling loudly for both a cutback in foreign imperialism, our over-sized military and our increasingly intrusive police state.

    I personally think part of the problem is that this is becoming a national question instead of a local one. Rural residents are far more used to using and being around firearms than urban dwellers. What’s called for in Chicago doesn’t always match what plays in Peoria.

  • ShannonLeee

    But who will protect the students from crazy teachers? Every year we see numerous rape cases throughout the US education system. No, the answer is to arm every student.

  • http://wideeyedandreal.blogspot.com ProfElwood

    Funny you should mention that, ShannonLeee, because that was what my daughter said would happen. That is, if the teachers started bringing their guns to school, the students would want to follow (most of the them would have hunting rifles), since they’re already bringing their knives.

    As I said, it’d be important that the public didn’t really know.

  • dduck

    My wife, an ex teacher, would have been tempted to use her imaginary 44 magnum on some of the bigger as______ parents at the Parent Teacher Conference.
    Their jobs are hard enough without having to tote a .45.

  • DORIAN DE WIND, Military Affairs Columnist

    According to the Washington Post the NRA has sunk to a new low:

    The National Rifle Association released a new video on its Web site Tuesday calling President Obama an “elitist hypocrite” for having Secret Service protection of his daughters at school but saying he was “skeptical” about installing armed guards in all schools.

    The NRA’s provocative, 35-second video is as harsh as any attack ad in a political campaign and illustrates how emotionally charged and personal the debate over gun control is becoming.

    “Are the president’s kids more important than yours?” a deep-voiced narrator asks. “Then why is he skeptical about putting armed security in our schools when his kids are protected by armed guards at their school? Mr. Obama demands the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes, but he’s just another elitist hypocrite when it comes to a fair share of security.”

    You can view this despicable ad here

  • STinMN

    Perhaps they could offer a minor in Assault Techniques w/Hand to Hand combat.

    It’s a Brave New World…

    It isn’t too far from that, except it has been required for almost a decade in the school district my wife works in. CPI and/or PCM training is recommended, and required for those employees that have regular contact with students that could be aggressive or violent. My wife usually takes the CPI because it involves less physical holds than PCM. The first time she took PCM she was in a class with a friend of ours, he had just started as a deputy in the sheriff’s department and was required to have the same training. All that required training and at a budget busting cost of $14/hr starting…

  • zephyr

    Now a month later, the pervasive indifference resumes.

    Not quite Marc. Ammo is still flying off the shelves as we speak, especially handgun ammo.

    I am surprised by the reactions of some TMV readers and contributors, and by many people I meet, that I’m not serious and I’m just arguing ad absurdum.

    Perhaps those who think you are arguing ad absurdum are giving you the benefit of the doubt.