David Brooks Takes A Sip Of Reality

David Brooks is usually clueless but he at least dips a toe in the cold sea of reality today.  He rightly observes that voters like Medicare and Medicaid and that any serious cuts are unlikely.

Americans don’t particularly like government, but they do want government to subsidize their health care. They believe that health care spending improves their lives more than any other public good. In a Quinnipiac poll, typical of many others, Americans opposed any cuts to Medicare by a margin of 70 percent to 25 percent.

In a democracy, voters get what they want, so the line tracing federal health care spending looks like the slope of a jet taking off from LaGuardia. Medicare spending is set to nearly double over the next decade. This is the crucial element driving all federal spending over the next few decades and pushing federal debt to about 250 percent of G.D.P. in 30 years.

There are no conceivable tax increases that can keep up with this spending rise. The Democrats had their best chance in a generation to raise revenue just now, and all they got was a measly $600 billion over 10 years. This is barely a wiggle on the revenue line and does nothing to change the overall fiscal picture.

He also observes correctly that the only place the money can come from is the Defense Department.

So far, defense budgets have not been squeezed by the Medicare vise. But that is about to change. Oswald Spengler didn’t get much right, but he was certainly correct when he told European leaders that they could either be global military powers or pay for their welfare states, but they couldn’t do both.

Europeans, who are ahead of us in confronting that decision, have chosen welfare over global power. European nations can no longer perform many elemental tasks of moving troops and fighting. As late as the 1990s, Europeans were still spending 2.5 percent of G.D.P. on defense. Now that spending is closer to 1.5 percent, and, amid European malaise, it is bound to sink further.

The United States will undergo a similar process. The current budget calls for a steep but possibly appropriate decline in defense spending, from 4.3 percent of G.D.P. to 3 percent, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

But defense planners are notoriously bad at estimating how fast postwar military cuts actually come. After Vietnam, the cold war and the 1991 gulf war, they vastly underestimated the size of the cuts that eventually materialized. And those cuts weren’t forced by the Medicare vise. The coming cuts are.

I do have to take exception with Brook’s claim that this is why Chuck Hagel was chosen.  It is inevitable that military spending will be cut and Hagel has been a trusted Obama adviser from the beginning.   Empires most often end not when they are defeated in battle but when they are defeated in their treasuries.  That is where the United States is now and a smaller US footprint in the world is a given.

Cross posted at Middle Earth Journal

Auf Stumbleupon zeigen
Auf tumblr zeigen

  • The_Ohioan

    Yes, yes. “End when they are defeated in their treasuries”. The ultimate reality check.

  • zephyr

    Yes, good to see Brooks get it right for a change. As for Hagel, if Obama wants him that’s enough to make republicans NOT want him, no other reason required.

  • dduck

    When he comes down on the “correct” side he is OK, but clueless when he doesn’t agree with the liberals on every point. Yup.