
Among the US Presidents who visited India, Bill Clinton made a great impression; and close second was George W. Bush. Their informal and intense ways won many admirers. Please don’t ask me how their controversial actions/reputation/policies were completely overlooked (there are enough experts to pontificate on this).
Now the spotlight is again on Bill Clinton for his pro-active role in his wife’s presidential campaign. The Telegraph notes: “When a beaming Bill Clinton bounced on to the stage to introduce his wife Hillary at her final rally before the Nevada caucus, he gave the kind of effusive performance for which he is so well known. It marked a return to his genial, crowd-pleasing ways after a series of angry outbursts that have seriously worried campaign aides.
“David Gergen, a former presidential adviser, offered The New York Times an insider’s take on the Clinton temper. ‘Bubbling just below the surface is a deep resentment against the press about the way he feels she [Mrs Clinton] is portrayed against Barack. He is a bit like Mount Vesuvius: he’ll just erupt, but then it’s over, because the good thing about his temper is he doesn’t bear grudges’.”
Bill is likely to be damned if he expresses strong emotions in favour of his wife during the presidential campaign, he is likely to be damned too if he limits himself to the backroom in this chaotic phase of the campaign (and earn the epithet of being a heartless husband). So he must have opted for a safer line. Who can object if a man shows his muscle power if his wife is being attacked?
I don’t understand why leading democrats are asking Bill Clinton to pipe down…
When you cross 60, you suddenly realise how unfair you had been to your wife, and maybe not much supportive during the testing times in life….
At least I realised this. And I presume, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, who are my age, may be thinking like that…!!!
(Photo above: courtesy Todd Heisler/The New York Times)