An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Primaries: A Challenge to the Last Dollar

dollar

According to this article from Italy’s La Stampa,

Money, money, money: this is the word – bipartisan like no other – that will guide the electoral campaigns of the Republican and Democratic candidates through the next four weeks. Objective – to survive with full treasure chests after February 5, when on ‘Super Tuesday’ 22 states will hold their primary votes.

Getting money depends on electoral success. And electoral success depends on getting money.

To the outsider, the American notion that the political spending of money is protected as freedom of speech is strange. It is one of a few important examples of what distinguishes American capitalism from European capitalism: over there, financial and property rights are generally deemed as important as other human rights; over here, it’s as if they are more important – to be protected and exercised at any cost – even to Democracy itself.

That electoral success depends on the courting of sources of funds to buy voters’ opinions using precious time that could otherwise be spent making political arguments directly to the same voters can be deemed undemocratic – especially as funds raised typically come with certain obligations or expectations that no one ever votes for.

Read “Primaries: A Challenge to the Last Dollar” on Watching America.com

  • JSpencer
    "To the outsider, the American notion that the political spending of money is protected as freedom of speech is strange."

    Trust me, it's strange to lots of insiders too. The concept really showed how this particular Supreme Court is willing to help sustain a truly bastardized definition of free speech.
  • superdestroyer
    If you look at the mischief that has occurred after the passing of McCain-Feingold. Look at Seattle where the radio personalities were investigated for violating M-F because the talked about referendums on the ballot.

    Limiting individuals to a few hundred dollars worth of speech while allowing unlimited editorials on CNN or in the NY Times just tilts the playing field even more to the Democratic party. But then again, isn't that the whole point of campaign financing regulations?
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC