
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama/Sebelius?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/17103/obamasebelius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17103/obamasebelius/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 10:59:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17103/obamasebelius/comment-page-1/#comment-134624</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/barack-obama/17103/obamasebelius/#comment-134624</guid>
		<description>The slash character has been misused for quite a while.  It&#039;s not the case here, but often you&#039;ll see the slash misused in place of a conjunction.  In the case here, the slash is wrongly used in place of a hyphen.  (The hyphen means &quot;and&quot; while the slash means &quot;or,&quot; is another way to view this.)  The hyphen combines; the slash separates.  (Your &quot;initials&quot; example is interesting.)  It&#039;s not just incorrect punctuation, but incorrect conception.  It&#039;s a pet peeve of mine, particularly when the poor English is in a flippant or play-pen context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The slash character has been misused for quite a while.  It&#39;s not the case here, but often you&#39;ll see the slash misused in place of a conjunction.  In the case here, the slash is wrongly used in place of a hyphen.  (The hyphen means &#8220;and&#8221; while the slash means &#8220;or,&#8221; is another way to view this.)  The hyphen combines; the slash separates.  (Your &#8220;initials&#8221; example is interesting.)  It&#39;s not just incorrect punctuation, but incorrect conception.  It&#39;s a pet peeve of mine, particularly when the poor English is in a flippant or play-pen context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17103/obamasebelius/comment-page-1/#comment-134623</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/barack-obama/17103/obamasebelius/#comment-134623</guid>
		<description>DLS:  thanks for the rule on the proper presentation of the President&#039;s and Vice President&#039;s names when they&#039;re together.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually didn&#039;t know that.  But I think in my postings, once we know both I&#039;ll probably use the slash just to distinguish it from two names combined into one, the legally hyphenated version.  Somehow in my mind a slash seems more accurate.  Actually I&#039;ll probably use their initials, perhaps O/R for Obama-Richardson.  I think O/R is pretty good since this country needs an operating room to heal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DLS:  thanks for the rule on the proper presentation of the President&#39;s and Vice President&#39;s names when they&#39;re together.  </p>
<p>I actually didn&#39;t know that.  But I think in my postings, once we know both I&#39;ll probably use the slash just to distinguish it from two names combined into one, the legally hyphenated version.  Somehow in my mind a slash seems more accurate.  Actually I&#39;ll probably use their initials, perhaps O/R for Obama-Richardson.  I think O/R is pretty good since this country needs an operating room to heal.</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
<p>But</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/17103/obamasebelius/comment-page-1/#comment-134622</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/barack-obama/17103/obamasebelius/#comment-134622</guid>
		<description>Obama-Sebelius (correctly written with a hyphen, not a slash) will leave most people scratching their heads and saying, &quot;Who?&quot; more than had happened with Geraldine Ferraro.  It will also be seen as a cheap attack on Hillary Clinton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since a couple of establishmentarian Unity 08&#039;s members want to &quot;draft&quot; Bloomberg, Bloomberg would be a Democrat again if he were honest, he would split the Democratic vote if he entered as an &quot;independent&quot; [sic], he might be an alternative to the still-most-likely-and-logical John Edwards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either that or bring Gore back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama-Sebelius (correctly written with a hyphen, not a slash) will leave most people scratching their heads and saying, &#8220;Who?&#8221; more than had happened with Geraldine Ferraro.  It will also be seen as a cheap attack on Hillary Clinton.</p>
<p>Since a couple of establishmentarian Unity 08&#39;s members want to &#8220;draft&#8221; Bloomberg, Bloomberg would be a Democrat again if he were honest, he would split the Democratic vote if he entered as an &#8220;independent&#8221; [sic], he might be an alternative to the still-most-likely-and-logical John Edwards.</p>
<p>Either that or bring Gore back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

