An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Iraq Mousetrap for a New President

As Democratic candidates make promises to voters about troop withdrawal, George W. Bush is in the Middle East trying to tie the hands of his successor in office.

In November, he joined Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in a declaration of principles to negotiate an agreement to guarantee US troop presence for years. It would replace the existing Security Council mandate authorizing multinational forces in Iraq and become a sworn obligation for the next president. Now, Bush announces in Kuwait that they are moving ahead with the plan.

According to Michael Hirsh of Newsweek, “The target date for concluding the agreement is July, says Gen. Doug Lute, Bush’s Iraq coordinator in the White House–in other words, just in time for the Democratic and Republican national conventions.”

The intention is to bypass Congress and commit the next president to Bush’s agenda. “We don’t anticipate now,” Gen. Lute has said, “that these negotiations will lead to the status of a formal treaty which would then bring us to formal negotiations or formal inputs from the Congress.”

Last month, Hillary Clinton urged Bush not to sign any such agreement without congressional approval since it would be difficult if not impossible for a future president to breach. White House silence has been deafening.

Touting the Surge’s success, Bush said this weekend that “long-term success will require active U.S. engagement that outlasts my presidency.”

If the Democratic Congress tries to head him off at the pass with legislation, its legality would be challenged and the Bush years might end where they started–in the Supreme Court.

Cross-posted from my blog.

  • DLS
    More Dim misuse of the courts would hardly be a surprise.

    Vote Democratic, without question better than the GOP. No thinking required!
  • DLS
    and before Shaun seizes it:

    "active U.S. engagement that outlasts my presidency"

    The Bush legacy!!!
  • My first thought on this is that it might actually end the war sooner. Some an agreement would not be approved by the Iraqi Parliment anymore than it would be approved by the US congress. If al-Maliki were to sign such an agreement unilaterally it would bring down his fragile government. On top of that al-Sadr would quickly end his truce. Since there are many al-Sadr supporters in the Iraqi Security forces the relative peace we have seen the last few months would evaporate.
  • DLS
    Well, it would give us a rationalization (excuse) to reduce our forces and retreat from an occupational and reconstruction role to that of a foreign force posted to aid regional stability, bunkered in a few military bases.
  • StockBoySF
    At one time Bush said, "As the Iraqis stand up we will stand down." Or something to that effect. Now Bush is saying, "May the (US) Force go with you- and stay with you forever and ever. Amen."
  • JSpencer
    "Bush said this weekend that “long-term success will require active U.S. engagement that outlasts my presidency.""

    Long term success? Must be code for the toxic waste dump of a legacy he'll be leaving - preserved through the next couple terms if at all possible.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC